Why is anyone surprised?

There is a clear agenda to promote minorities over the majority.
It affects every institution, industry and entertainment.

Look at our 'choice' for the next Prime Minister, and then consider this country's demographics.

We are being subjugated.

No it isn't.

It's blatant misrepresentation of what the BBC's reporter actually said, which is, after all, one reporter's view and not the view of the BBC.

What it indicates is the desire of some people to see prejudice against "white" people where none exists. This is much more evidence of a white supremacist attitude than the reverse.

That the reporter observed that there were only "white" faces in the team, and that this suggests a lack of diversity in the sport, is merely a suggestion worth analysing. It was not a criticism of the team, or their performance.

That some wish to flay the BBC for a perfectly reasonable question, asked by one individual, is pretty ridiculous and speaks volumes about those who wish to do it.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

That’s fair enough but I didn’t see her add an opinion that maybe the black players just aren’t good enough and going forwards maybe they will get better and be good enough. That is called balance and there was none in her report. Do you not agree?
Ie your very own covid post include whys and wherefores so it’s not difficult.

Congratulations on defending the indefensible.

Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

What a lot of deluded codswallop.

Your usual standard.

The reporter stated All starting eleven players and the five substitutes that came onto the pitch were all white, and that does point to a lack of diversity in the women’s game. She was going beyond suggesting.

What views were exchanged in the documentary the presenter was linking into?

The same point was being made. A white England team was portrayed as a negative because it was not diverse. The doc went further suggesting that the academy system on a socio economic level disadvantages black players hence the lack of diversity in the Englands team, avoiding the point that Englands current players are frequently working class and will experience the same challenges the programme decided was holding black players back in the system.

The documentary didnt analyise because it didnt provide facts and figures of participation rates through the pathway.The documentary made a sweeping assertion without evidence - A white XI and five white subs that has occurred several times is not a measurement of anything much. The squad demographic of 13% being non white mirrors roughly society and? Nothing.

Football isnt a tool of diversity, its based on merit. The white XI and five white subs are the best on offer and Parris, Stokes are squad players.

The BBC also gave air to a black ex player who stated that she couldnt connect with any part of the players identity (white), this team didn't speak to her, didnt inspire her because of that identity. Prejudice? Racism?

Edited by Pembroke (17 Jul 2022 4.25pm)

Edited by Pembroke (17 Jul 2022 4.26pm)

The merit argument is of course a noble one.....but it has been around since before the sixties and....quite frankly I think it was only used as a way in....a way to fool the reasonable.

Because look what happened....now 'protected characteristics' is actual law in the west....nothing to do with merit it's down to your identity....and that law is defended and maintained by conservatives.

I still can't really believe that....an eighty seat majority and they have changed nothing of those laws....indeed, the 'online safety' bill comes from their pens.

I'll always respect libertarianism but what that group can't seem to accept is that they lost. They keep using the same arguments like their opponents are suddenly going to see sense....abandon their advantages and be reasonable.

The harsh truth is that the libertarian argument was always the best way to run things, but it only worked in high trust socially cohesive societies....immigration meant it lost to identity politics....it lost due to numbers....the demographics won instead. You don't convince people away from arguments that succeed for them....it doesn't matter how bad the arguments are...the reality is all that matters is power, those that have it and those that don't and demographics decides that.

The evidence is Khan in London.....it doesn't matter how bad a major he is, the same demographics will vote for him regardless.

I can point to Detroit in the US.....it's a sh1thole but regardless the same demographics will vote for the same representation because identity politics wins.....Only European stock decides that race is less important.

The Europeans have been taught to play with one arm behind their backs. They have thrown away everything their ancestors achieved out of fear of being called racist....they don't even recognise control of their own lands anymore....might as well change the name of England to Anywhere.

In a way we deserve it.....Never thought I'd see the anglo saxon kneel......Perhaps those genes are not worthy of long term survival.

Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Jul 2022 4.38pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

(in all kinds of ways)

The video is attached of two BBC weather forecasts 19 years apart

2003 it was warmer than planned this weekend and most of the map yellow/orange

2022 nearly the whole map in red

The BBC is just there to push a relentless agenda.

Attachment: 2022-07-17 17.07.30.mp4 (2,021.37Kb)

If memory serves carbon dioxide does not burn, but methane does. Has there been any thought about providing extractor fans in milking parlours and cattle sheds so that the methane can be harvested? Energy cost and climate change both reducing we hope. n