You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
June 5 2024 3.24am

Coronavirus (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 982 of 1255 < 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 >

Topic Locked

W12 02 Dec 21 3.24pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

No. I read them all. Nothing you have said, or provided, suggests anything other than that article is scaremongering. It seeks to suggest that there is a link between the vaccination of children and an increased mortality, when no such link has been established, nor, to my current knowledge, can it be.

"I read them all"

"that article"

Happy to ignore hundreds of miscarriages then?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 02 Dec 21 3.43pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by W12

[Link]

"It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported"

I know the father-in-law didn't report the fact that he was pretty weak and sore for about a week.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Dec 21 3.50pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I know the father-in-law didn't report the fact that he was pretty weak and sore for about a week.

I didn't report mine. Ignored anyway when I did speak to the doctor about it.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Orange1290's Profile Orange1290 Flag 02 Dec 21 4.48pm Send a Private Message to Orange1290 Add Orange1290 as a friend

Originally posted by W12

[Link]

"It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported"

10% of an insignificant amount is still insignificant, even more insignificant are 2% and 4%. However, the vast, vast majority didn't have any 'reactions' at all, so why not quote that fact?

Edited by Orange1290 (02 Dec 2021 4.48pm)

 


Pro China, EU & Palestine

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 02 Dec 21 4.53pm

Originally posted by W12

[Link]

"It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported"

This stat relates to drugs in general doesn't it (not at all specifically vaccines). Maybe we should stop all medical treatments, wouldn't want anyone to have a side effect?

How many people experiencing serious effects of covid don't report them, other than a general test to say they've had it? The vast majority who don't end up in hospital perhaps. Of people with actual identified serious side effects in both groups, covid has been seen to do substantially more harm on all counts, for all conditions. That would seen to useful data rather than searching for anti vax angles.

Also worth adding is that those 'under 60' who have serious covid cases that result in hospitalisation are significantly more likely to die even a 'year after recovery' than others their age. To me that suggests that it's clearly done a major number on people healthwise if they're hospitalised, and that is far more likely to happen with the unvaccinated. There have been thousands of covid deaths in the under 65s directly as result of is,so God knows the wider impact in the 'recovered' and vaccines reduce hospitalisations by a seriously significant level. Are you positing that thousands have also died directly as result of simply being vaccinated. If not then perhaps people have their answer.

If you don't want to get vaccinated, then don't.

Edited by BlueJay (02 Dec 2021 5.09pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
BlueJay Flag UK 02 Dec 21 4.53pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I know the father-in-law didn't report the fact that he was pretty weak and sore for about a week.

Yes, I've heard a few people have been pretty weak and sore with covid too.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 02 Dec 21 4.57pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

Yes, I've heard a few people have been pretty weak and sore with covid too.

Yeah, but quite correctly those people have had that pretty well highlighted don't you think?.....whereas...

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 02 Dec 21 5.09pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Yeah, but quite correctly those people have had that pretty well highlighted don't you think?.....whereas...

I'm not sure that the serious health effects of those 'not' hospitalised with covid has been highlighted beyond the actual magnitude of it - a generalised mass of people who clearly have long term health effects following on from it - which is to be expected really.

If there are several hundreds of thousands of people without covid who are out on their feet for many months due to having a vaccine Im sure we'd soon recognise that. From studies to real world, that hasn't really happened and while there will clearly unfortunately be side effect sin some, it just gets hijacked as an anti vax strategy, which is pointless at this stage.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 5.10pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by W12

"I read them all"

"that article"

Happy to ignore hundreds of miscarriages then?

In this context, yes. Only when there is some kind of established, scientifically proven connection to the vaccines will they be relevant.

They aren't and are, in my opinion, extremely unlikely ever to be. If there was the slightest doubt of the efficacy and safety, the programme would have been stopped.

Look what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine when some rare instances of blood clotting were found.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 5.15pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I know the father-in-law didn't report the fact that he was pretty weak and sore for about a week.

I was weak and sore for a few days after my last flu jab. The covid was fine.

I didn't report it either. Should I have done?

The doctors have better things to do. If I didn't recover I would have done. These things happen. It's not a drama. Catching severe Covid is though.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 02 Dec 21 5.19pm

I don't really think there's any point in arguing the toss about getting vaccinated or it being somehow dangerous or ineffective in some way thus far. Across all metrics the opposite has been shown to be true. Not getting vaccinated has caused much more misery than its opposite.

Logically it should also cushion the blow of the next wave in terms of hospitalisations if not infections, I for one hope so anyway. I'm glad people acted as a community and country on this, because there's a hell of a lot of grieving families of those who didn't get vaccinated because they 'didn't need it'.

Anyway, people do as they do. You can lead a horse to water...

Edited by BlueJay (02 Dec 2021 5.26pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 02 Dec 21 5.25pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

I'm not sure that the serious health effects of those 'not' hospitalised with covid has been highlighted beyond the actual magnitude of it - a generalised mass of people who clearly have long term health effects following on from it - which is to be expected really.

If there are several hundreds of thousands of people without covid who are out on their feet for many months due to having a vaccine Im sure we'd soon recognise that. From studies to real world, that hasn't really happened and while there will clearly unfortunately be side effect sin some, it just gets hijacked as an anti vax strategy, which is pointless at this stage.

Don't you perhaps think that's a bit hyperbolic?

Anti vax?

I think the studies have been done, but they haven't received anything like the same publicity.....probably because of those who think as you do.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 982 of 1255 < 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic