You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
June 5 2024 6.35am

Coronavirus (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 984 of 1255 < 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 >

Topic Locked

View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 02 Dec 21 7.03pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

I have been waiting for a magic pill.

Always been self-isolating, playing it very long.

So far, so good.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 02 Dec 21 7.13pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Not in any way. I think it's extremely sad that this has even to be considered, forced on society by the irresponsible who refuse to take part in a community effort to beat a deadly disease.

I guess I would say that it's not a choice to begin with if its enforced . I don't think things have to be all of nothing. If the vast proportion of the population get vaccinated, there is little about a small percentage not doing so that is likely to alter any positives in the big picture. It's about doing what we can to cushion the blow of covid. It isn't going away. We do essentially do have to live with it much like the flu and our approach should be similar down the line.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
BlueJay Flag UK 02 Dec 21 7.13pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

I have been waiting for a magic pill.

Always been self-isolating, playing it very long.

So far, so good.

Viagra lost in the mail .

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 02 Dec 21 8.32pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend


Are they still giving AZ for the booster? I didn’t get it.


[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Orange1290's Profile Orange1290 Flag 02 Dec 21 8.38pm Send a Private Message to Orange1290 Add Orange1290 as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle


Are they still giving AZ for the booster? I didn’t get it.


[Link]

Boosters are only mRNA vaccines.

 


Pro China, EU & Palestine

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 02 Dec 21 9.21pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

This idea that there is some kind of dark side or danger that in some way makes the vaccine more concerning than getting covid , is the Alex Jones style angle in my view.

There is no secret movement to silence people saying that the vaccine impacted them negatively, and I hope certainly think that if people have been impacted to the extent that countless thousands are ill months later we would and should get to hear about it. As I say, there is a reason that many certainly do have long covid, and that there isn't huge visible group of those in a similar situation due to the vaccine.

While with anything there will be side effects, all in all the vaccine is clearly as safe as we could have hoped for, and vastly safer than getting covid. You seem to have viewed that you made the right decision by not getting vaccinated on account that you caught covid and weren't terribly ill or hospitalised. By all measures it was still the wrong decision to make really. A political decision, not a health one. As such you unfortunately possibly more inclined to overly humour those who would happily slap the needle out of grannies arm . Though I accept that you are personally in favour of the elderly getting vaccinated!


Edited by BlueJay (02 Dec 2021 6.45pm)

Can't say I agree with you that there isn't media downplaying of negative vaccine impacts.

You are right that I regard my decision on the vaccine as the correct one. Let's not forget that it's within the context of age and knowledge of my own system. It is of course my personal choice and I'm certainly less trusting than you....but that doesn't mean that I'm certain of any position.

Yes, you are also correct that my decision is partly political and reactionary to the way the state has manipulated and enforced its measures. As I've always said I think more people will die from their measures than be saved from them....the coercion and gradual removal of freedoms is insidious and I'm proud of the fact that I stood against it once we first knew the death risk percentage.

I'm certainly am against the young being coerced into taking unnecessary vaccines for the benefit of others though I certainly do recommend vaccines or treatments for those with weak immune systems or of advanced years.

As I've always said I'll review next year and look with fresh eyes at the evidence base, though that does not guarantee anything will change. I'm probably more interested in the treatments but we will see.

Hell, it's about personal choice and I won't stand with the erosion of long standing freedoms nor soft peddle those that do.


Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Dec 2021 9.32pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 9.23pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

I guess I would say that it's not a choice to begin with if its enforced . I don't think things have to be all of nothing. If the vast proportion of the population get vaccinated, there is little about a small percentage not doing so that is likely to alter any positives in the big picture. It's about doing what we can to cushion the blow of covid. It isn't going away. We do essentially do have to live with it much like the flu and our approach should be similar down the line.

They are not though forcing anyone to be vaccinated. Only restricting where the unvaccinated can go. This isn't actually anything new. Many countries demand that you are vaccinated against hepatitis b and yellow fever. You don't have to have them. You can choose not to go. Exactly the same choice faces the anti-vaxer now.

I don't suppose mandatory vaccination will actually be applied anywhere. Threatened, yes, but not applied as it would be unmanageable.

I don't have a problem with people believing whatever they like, even if it seems nuts to me. That's their business. What I care about is what they do. All of us have to do things we don't personally agree with. That's what living in a democratic community requires of us. We possess rights, but we also carry responsibilities. This is no different.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 02 Dec 21 9.50pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

They are not though forcing anyone to be vaccinated. Only restricting where the unvaccinated can go. This isn't actually anything new. Many countries demand that you are vaccinated against hepatitis b and yellow fever. You don't have to have them. You can choose not to go. Exactly the same choice faces the anti-vaxer now.

I don't suppose mandatory vaccination will actually be applied anywhere. Threatened, yes, but not applied as it would be unmanageable.

I don't have a problem with people believing whatever they like, even if it seems nuts to me. That's their business. What I care about is what they do. All of us have to do things we don't personally agree with. That's what living in a democratic community requires of us. We possess rights, but we also carry responsibilities. This is no different.

It is compulsory for some people.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 02 Dec 21 10.20pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

It is compulsory for some people.

[Link]

As my wife has just worked a 12-hour shift in A & E, I can tell you that's not strictly true.

That they won't allow the non-vaccinated to work on the front line doesn't mean it will be compulsory for NHS staff to be vaccinated. They will have to be re-deployed, if they either refuse or are medically exempted. In practice very few will be affected as the vast majority have been fully vaccinated as they understand, much better than some seem to, why it's so important.

My grand-daughter, who is pregnant and unvaccinated, is a specialist mental health nurse. She is now doing online consultations and assessments from home.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 02 Dec 21 10.30pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

As my wife has just worked a 12-hour shift in A & E, I can tell you that's not strictly true.

That they won't allow the non-vaccinated to work on the front line doesn't mean it will be compulsory for NHS staff to be vaccinated. They will have to be re-deployed, if they either refuse or are medically exempted. In practice very few will be affected as the vast majority have been fully vaccinated as they understand, much better than some seem to, why it's so important.

My grand-daughter, who is pregnant and unvaccinated, is a specialist mental health nurse. She is now doing online consultations and assessments from home.

That could be why it says “to be compulsory” rather than “is compulsory”.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 02 Dec 21 11.28pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by W12

The government data:

Perhaps you should have explained that this was not a causal link. The rate of spontaneous abortion appears the same whether recently vaccinated or not.

[Link]

Among women with spontaneous abortions, the odds of COVID-19 vaccine exposure were not increased in the prior 28 days compared with women with ongoing pregnancies.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 02 Dec 21 11.30pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by W12

Why are you changing the subject to abortion?

I was asking how well you know and trust this site. Seemed to be loaded with extreme subjectivity

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 984 of 1255 < 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic