Are YOU a "good" person?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
jamiemartin721  Reading 10 Mar 15 10.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 9.55pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 10 Mar 2015 8.57pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 8.32pm
The atheists who use condescending phrases to disparage christian beliefs are quite rude and would probably help themselves by being a little more respectful of others' viewpoint. Don't agree but by using terms like 'spagghetti monster,' 'sky fairy' and other cliched phrases its causing antagonism and reflects badly on your own position and argument. Ironically, that has its origins in Robert Anton Wilson, who whilst not a Christian, was certainly a believer in the mystical and preternatural - and a life long agnostic - Originally it was used to debunk not belief, but the idea of the certainty of rationalism as professed by James Randi etc. But usually used by, mainly, atheists on the hol, alongside terms such as sky fairies, in a condescending tone to be disrespectful to those who have a christian, or other, faith. Its not an irony that's wasted on me.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 Ouzo Dan 10 Mar 15 11.43pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 9.55pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 10 Mar 2015 8.57pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 8.32pm
The atheists who use condescending phrases to disparage christian beliefs are quite rude and would probably help themselves by being a little more respectful of others' viewpoint. Don't agree but by using terms like 'spagghetti monster,' 'sky fairy' and other cliched phrases its causing antagonism and reflects badly on your own position and argument. Ironically, that has its origins in Robert Anton Wilson, who whilst not a Christian, was certainly a believer in the mystical and preternatural - and a life long agnostic - Originally it was used to debunk not belief, but the idea of the certainty of rationalism as professed by James Randi etc. But usually used by, mainly, atheists on the hol, alongside terms such as sky fairies, in a condescending tone to be disrespectful to those who have a christian, or other, faith. ''What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence'' And so the sky fairy is born. The day a single shred of proper evidence is offered up is also the day religion will get more than a bit of eyeball rolling from me. Until that day it is a work of fiction & deserves a place alongside such mythological nonsense as Minotaurs & Chupacabra's.
Sex Panther 60% of the time it works every time |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Ouzo Dan 10 Mar 15 11.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Ya'll need Astronomy
Sex Panther 60% of the time it works every time |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
sprites  Auckland 11 Mar 15 1.33am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Ouzo Dan at 10 Mar 2015 11.43pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 9.55pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 10 Mar 2015 8.57pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 8.32pm
The atheists who use condescending phrases to disparage christian beliefs are quite rude and would probably help themselves by being a little more respectful of others' viewpoint. Don't agree but by using terms like 'spagghetti monster,' 'sky fairy' and other cliched phrases its causing antagonism and reflects badly on your own position and argument. Ironically, that has its origins in Robert Anton Wilson, who whilst not a Christian, was certainly a believer in the mystical and preternatural - and a life long agnostic - Originally it was used to debunk not belief, but the idea of the certainty of rationalism as professed by James Randi etc. But usually used by, mainly, atheists on the hol, alongside terms such as sky fairies, in a condescending tone to be disrespectful to those who have a christian, or other, faith. ''What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence'' And so the sky fairy is born. The day a single shred of proper evidence is offered up is also the day religion will get more than a bit of eyeball rolling from me. Until that day it is a work of fiction & deserves a place alongside such mythological nonsense as Minotaurs & Chupacabra's.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ParchmoreEagle  Belair 11 Mar 15 6.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote sprites at 11 Mar 2015 1.33am
Quote Ouzo Dan at 10 Mar 2015 11.43pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 9.55pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 10 Mar 2015 8.57pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 8.32pm
The atheists who use condescending phrases to disparage christian beliefs are quite rude and would probably help themselves by being a little more respectful of others' viewpoint. Don't agree but by using terms like 'spagghetti monster,' 'sky fairy' and other cliched phrases its causing antagonism and reflects badly on your own position and argument. Ironically, that has its origins in Robert Anton Wilson, who whilst not a Christian, was certainly a believer in the mystical and preternatural - and a life long agnostic - Originally it was used to debunk not belief, but the idea of the certainty of rationalism as professed by James Randi etc. But usually used by, mainly, atheists on the hol, alongside terms such as sky fairies, in a condescending tone to be disrespectful to those who have a christian, or other, faith. ''What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence'' And so the sky fairy is born. The day a single shred of proper evidence is offered up is also the day religion will get more than a bit of eyeball rolling from me. Until that day it is a work of fiction & deserves a place alongside such mythological nonsense as Minotaurs & Chupacabra's.
That's if you really want to find it. Which you don't.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| reborn 11 Mar 15 7.02am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote kingdowieonthewall at 10 Mar 2015 6.18pm
Reborn, The principle of a good god & his benevolence is worthy and great, but he seems to be in another room.
PS Taking the insults and goading are just part of the gig, and will never get a rise. Hoof and cohorts should realise that.
My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Ouzo Dan 11 Mar 15 7.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote sprites at 11 Mar 2015 1.33am
Quote Ouzo Dan at 10 Mar 2015 11.43pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 9.55pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 10 Mar 2015 8.57pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 8.32pm
The atheists who use condescending phrases to disparage christian beliefs are quite rude and would probably help themselves by being a little more respectful of others' viewpoint. Don't agree but by using terms like 'spagghetti monster,' 'sky fairy' and other cliched phrases its causing antagonism and reflects badly on your own position and argument. Ironically, that has its origins in Robert Anton Wilson, who whilst not a Christian, was certainly a believer in the mystical and preternatural - and a life long agnostic - Originally it was used to debunk not belief, but the idea of the certainty of rationalism as professed by James Randi etc. But usually used by, mainly, atheists on the hol, alongside terms such as sky fairies, in a condescending tone to be disrespectful to those who have a christian, or other, faith. ''What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence'' And so the sky fairy is born. The day a single shred of proper evidence is offered up is also the day religion will get more than a bit of eyeball rolling from me. Until that day it is a work of fiction & deserves a place alongside such mythological nonsense as Minotaurs & Chupacabra's.
Of course I do & thats why I am out, It is no more believable than any other mythological creature, you are welcome to believe in what you like but a secular society is what I desire. We have the mad Creationist Parchmore (someone willing to admit that humans walked the earth with dinosaurs yet the dinos all died in the 'great flood' & well Noah...) pushing sermons & testimonies claiming this is evidence & then we have Reborn going for the oppressed Christian angle whilst constantly talking about himself & claiming to have seen god yet (theres plenty of scientific evidence for this) the probability leans heavily on it being flash backs from a past full of drugs. You people are Crazy.
Sex Panther 60% of the time it works every time |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 11 Mar 15 8.01am |
|
|---|---|
|
It's a good philosophy by which to live one's life and it brings comfort and a peace of mind to many that without they wouldn't have. That's right. Ringing up Babestation.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| sprites Auckland 11 Mar 15 8.35am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Ouzo Dan at 11 Mar 2015 7.44am
Quote sprites at 11 Mar 2015 1.33am
Quote Ouzo Dan at 10 Mar 2015 11.43pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 9.55pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 10 Mar 2015 8.57pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 8.32pm
The atheists who use condescending phrases to disparage christian beliefs are quite rude and would probably help themselves by being a little more respectful of others' viewpoint. Don't agree but by using terms like 'spagghetti monster,' 'sky fairy' and other cliched phrases its causing antagonism and reflects badly on your own position and argument. Ironically, that has its origins in Robert Anton Wilson, who whilst not a Christian, was certainly a believer in the mystical and preternatural - and a life long agnostic - Originally it was used to debunk not belief, but the idea of the certainty of rationalism as professed by James Randi etc. But usually used by, mainly, atheists on the hol, alongside terms such as sky fairies, in a condescending tone to be disrespectful to those who have a christian, or other, faith. ''What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence'' And so the sky fairy is born. The day a single shred of proper evidence is offered up is also the day religion will get more than a bit of eyeball rolling from me. Until that day it is a work of fiction & deserves a place alongside such mythological nonsense as Minotaurs & Chupacabra's.
Of course I do & thats why I am out, It is no more believable than any other mythological creature, you are welcome to believe in what you like but a secular society is what I desire. We have the mad Creationist Parchmore (someone willing to admit that humans walked the earth with dinosaurs yet the dinos all died in the 'great flood' & well Noah...) pushing sermons & testimonies claiming this is evidence & then we have Reborn going for the oppressed Christian angle whilst constantly talking about himself & claiming to have seen god yet (theres plenty of scientific evidence for this) the probability leans heavily on it being flash backs from a past full of drugs. You people are Crazy.
Fair enough. I'm not here to change your mind. But dear Lord, what a pointless, meaningless and hopeless society a completely secure one would be. What's the point? The world has turned to s***...(which is prophetic, btw
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
)...I think I'd just give up if I didnt know this world was just a temporary stop. | Kermit8 Hevon 11 Mar 15 9.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
Anyways, it's by the by. Sun is getting bigger and we will all be toast and ashes in 5billion years whether we repent and believe or not. Suppose God will move on to another planet and interfere with them when that happens. Fickle.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 11 Mar 15 10.41am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote reborn at 11 Mar 2015 7.02am
Quote kingdowieonthewall at 10 Mar 2015 6.18pm
Reborn, The principle of a good god & his benevolence is worthy and great, but he seems to be in another room.
PS Taking the insults and goading are just part of the gig, and will never get a rise. Hoof and cohorts should realise that.
You were funny as fcuk mate and I enjoyed your participation in a debate. Now I feel a bit like 'Chief' at the end of 'One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest'.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Mar 15 5.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote ParchmoreEagle at 11 Mar 2015 6.04am
Quote sprites at 11 Mar 2015 1.33am
Quote Ouzo Dan at 10 Mar 2015 11.43pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 9.55pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 10 Mar 2015 8.57pm
Quote sitdownstandup at 10 Mar 2015 8.32pm
The atheists who use condescending phrases to disparage christian beliefs are quite rude and would probably help themselves by being a little more respectful of others' viewpoint. Don't agree but by using terms like 'spagghetti monster,' 'sky fairy' and other cliched phrases its causing antagonism and reflects badly on your own position and argument. Ironically, that has its origins in Robert Anton Wilson, who whilst not a Christian, was certainly a believer in the mystical and preternatural - and a life long agnostic - Originally it was used to debunk not belief, but the idea of the certainty of rationalism as professed by James Randi etc. But usually used by, mainly, atheists on the hol, alongside terms such as sky fairies, in a condescending tone to be disrespectful to those who have a christian, or other, faith. ''What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence'' And so the sky fairy is born. The day a single shred of proper evidence is offered up is also the day religion will get more than a bit of eyeball rolling from me. Until that day it is a work of fiction & deserves a place alongside such mythological nonsense as Minotaurs & Chupacabra's.
That's if you really want to find it. Which you don't. Firstly, its of the possibility of a god, not a specific god. Its a classic strawman, you cannot disprove the existence of something in a metaphysical argument (or prove it absolutely), you can only attest to critically assess the values associated. So you can definitely prove the possibility of the existence of god, provided you don't attempt to critically demonstrate that god in relation to specific attributes - such as proving the existence of the God of the Bible as presented by, say Catholicsm. Its very easy to demonstrate the possibility of something, that isn't evidence. Evidence requires that you present a hypothesis that is more probable than a null hypothesis (ie you have to demonstrate that its more probable that 'a Christian god' of the bible exists, than doesn't. And that is an entirely different matter.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.