You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Weatherspoons fined for banning p*****
May 1 2024 1.17pm

Weatherspoons fined for banning p*****

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 13 of 16 < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 23 May 15 12.33pm

The correct taxi analogy would be the taxi driver taking you part of the way, and then deciding they didn't want your dog in the car after all, and leaving you near Embankment when you'd paid to go to Norwood.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 23 May 15 1.11pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 23 May 2015 12.31pm

Quote npn at 22 May 2015 6.01pm

Quote imbored at 22 May 2015 5.27pm

Quote npn at 22 May 2015 5.17pm

Quote imbored at 22 May 2015 4.59pm

Quote derben at 22 May 2015 4.57pm

Quote imbored at 22 May 2015 4.39pm

Quote derben at 22 May 2015 4.32pm


Brownlie should join the European Court of Bizarre Judgements, she is just right (or perhaps left) for them.

Apart from being correct in all three cases, you're right.

1) Violation of contract law is grounds for damages.
2) Existing rulings mean she has no choice but to abide by the decisions of other judges.
3) Something you put in the public domain is not copyright, even if you're an ex-British Agent.

But other than that, yes, she's crazy to actually uphold the law, and should indeed base her judgements on how uptight right wing knickerwetters can get.
___________________________________________________

What instead of the prejudices of left wing politically correct twerps?

Why do you keep insisting this is about contract law. The homosexual activist claimed he had been discriminated against contrary to the provisions of the Equality Act (sexual Orientation) Regulations (Northern Ireland)2006.


Edited by derben (22 May 2015 4.34pm)

If the baker was gay and refused to make a cake supporting marriage between heterosexual couples once he had accepted the order he too would fall fowl of the law.

Of course it's unlikely that such a scenario would come about since typically it wouldn't occur to a gay person to view a heterosexual relationship as inferior.

" This is not a law which is for one belief only but is equal to and for all. "


Edited by imbored (22 May 2015 4.54pm)

Jamie keeps arguing it is about contracts and not that the gay activist is gay. (What have chickens got to do with it? Is there a 'we should be able to marry fowls lobby'?

Bok bok. A 'foul' on my part. I was using an example of how the law is fair regardless of whether it aligns with your or anyone elses prejudices.


Edited by imbored (22 May 2015 5.06pm)


There seem to be a mixture of arguments here.

If the contract was taken and later cancelled I can see there may be a case of violation of contract law (I don't know, but can see an argument). A violation of contract law is very different from a discrimination case. If it got to court at all, I suspect all that would happen is you would be forced to return the money together with any expenses the cancellation led to - in this case, likely to be next to nothing as you simply move the order to another bakery.

The fine is for discriminating against people on the grounds of their sexual orientation - which I have demonstrated is clearly NOT the case, as they would have refused to bake the cake for a straight person in exactly the same way they did for a gay person.

They may have provided shoddy customer service, they may possibly have even broken contract law, but they have not discrimninated against anyone, and, as such, the judgement is not so much flawed as just completely incorrect.

If the guy had gone into the hsop and been told "we're not serving you, you're gay" then I'd back the case 100%. What they have said is "we're not making a cake with THAT slogan on, for anyone"

Any number opf straw man arguments are being thrown up (guide dogs, 'no blacks' etc) none of which are in any way relevant to this case.


The 'no blacks' example was aimed at derben since he also believes that it's acceptable to refuse accommodation to couples based on their sexuality. I simply extended it to race.

Regardless of what anyone thinks, if a baker refused to bake a cake with a message supporting Christianity based on the fact that he was an atheist we'd be in the same situation. It would be reasonable to assume that the person ordering the cake was a Christian, though of course that's down to the particular circumstances.

Out of interest why do you view the guide dog example is so far wide of the mark? After all the muslim taxi driver would've refused to allow all dogs in the car regardless of whether the passenger was blind. However he was not denying service to the person.


Edited by imbored (22 May 2015 5.49pm)


Because it is, again, a denial of service as opposed to a refusal to undertake a specific task. If you like, the difference between :

"you're not getting in my cab" / "I'm not serving you"
and
"I'm not going South of the river at this time of night" / "I'm not making a cake with that writing on".

The first item in both those cases is acceptable, the second, in my view, is not.

Additionally, the blind person is not taking a guide dog through choice, but necessity. The gay man may not have chosen to be gay, but he did choose the wording he wanted on his cake.

Actually the case is this. They agreed to make the cake, took money for it and then later decided they didn't want to honour that contract.

Which is the point. They had the right to not engage in business, choose to engage in business, and then think they should be able to breach that pre-paid agreement because 'they don't support gay marriage'.

The gay trouble maker did not sue the bakers under contract law, he sued them under the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations (Northern Ireland)2006, claiming he had been discriminated against contrary to its provisions. The Act defines discrimination as 'on grounds of sexual orientation, person A treats person B less favourably than he treats other persons'. Clearly the bakers would have treated a straight man in exactly the same way if he had asked for the same wording on the cake. Obviously not guilty m'lud.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 23 May 15 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 23 May 15 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 23 May 15 5.41pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.


You seem to enjoy mocking gay people more than most in our more enlighted and educated society, so I'm sure there's a 'traditional' muslim version of you in one of these countries cheering on one abuse of another.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 23 May 15 5.46pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.41pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.


You seem to enjoy mocking gay people more than most in our more enlighted and educated society, so I'm sure there's a 'traditional' muslim version of you in one of these countries cheering on one abuse of another.


When have I mocked gay people? And are you suggesting I support Islamic persecution of gay people, or indeed any persecution of gay people?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 23 May 15 5.52pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.46pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.41pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.


You seem to enjoy mocking gay people more than most in our more enlighted and educated society, so I'm sure there's a 'traditional' muslim version of you in one of these countries cheering on one abuse of another.


When have I mocked gay people? And are you suggesting I support Islamic persecution of gay people, or indeed any persecution of gay people?

Anything I pointed out you would pass off as a 'joke' so there's no point. Suffice to say you have, and it certainly seems that you don't view gay people as equals, which is really why a judgement like this has annoyed you.

There is a completely different tone in this thread regarding how people have talked about Christians to how you have talked about homosexuals.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 23 May 15 5.58pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.52pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.46pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.41pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.


You seem to enjoy mocking gay people more than most in our more enlighted and educated society, so I'm sure there's a 'traditional' muslim version of you in one of these countries cheering on one abuse of another.


When have I mocked gay people? And are you suggesting I support Islamic persecution of gay people, or indeed any persecution of gay people?

Anything I pointed out you would pass off as a 'joke' so there's no point. Suffice to say you have, and it certainly seems that you don't view gay people as equals, which is really why a judgement like this has annoyed you.

There is a completely different tone in this thread regarding how people have talked about Christians to how you have talked about homosexuals.


Just present some evidence. I do view gay people as equals. The judgement annoys me because it is wrong, the bakers did not discriminate. Most posts in this thread have mocked Christians - I view them as equals too (and Muslims come to that). However, I do reserve the right to mock whoever I like.

Edited by derben (23 May 2015 6.03pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 23 May 15 6.17pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.58pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.52pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.46pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.41pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.


You seem to enjoy mocking gay people more than most in our more enlighted and educated society, so I'm sure there's a 'traditional' muslim version of you in one of these countries cheering on one abuse of another.


When have I mocked gay people? And are you suggesting I support Islamic persecution of gay people, or indeed any persecution of gay people?

Anything I pointed out you would pass off as a 'joke' so there's no point. Suffice to say you have, and it certainly seems that you don't view gay people as equals, which is really why a judgement like this has annoyed you.

There is a completely different tone in this thread regarding how people have talked about Christians to how you have talked about homosexuals.


Just present some evidence. I do view gay people as equals. The judgement annoys me because it is wrong, the bakers did not discriminate. Most posts in this thread have mocked Christians - I view them as equals too (and Muslims come to that).

The cake design comparisons you gave all related to horrendous and criminal acts, and certainly not groups protected in law so were intentionally inflammatory rather than illustrative. Of course your message about gay people all moving to their own town and writing their 'silly slogans' on cakes was intentionally mocking.

What is your view of gay marriage? For a start you refered to that as 'marriage', so I take it you don't view it as being 'equal'.

My whole point is that businesses gay or straight, christian or atheist should just get on with business. We see that in not doing so, it opens the door for people with an axe to grind at certain groups. Uniformity of service is good for society.

As for what people believe outside of a business context, I move in the other direction. I think people getting arrested for stupid offensive twitter comments are just low hanging fruit rather than a public concern.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 23 May 15 6.44pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 6.17pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.58pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.52pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.46pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.41pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.


You seem to enjoy mocking gay people more than most in our more enlighted and educated society, so I'm sure there's a 'traditional' muslim version of you in one of these countries cheering on one abuse of another.


When have I mocked gay people? And are you suggesting I support Islamic persecution of gay people, or indeed any persecution of gay people?

Anything I pointed out you would pass off as a 'joke' so there's no point. Suffice to say you have, and it certainly seems that you don't view gay people as equals, which is really why a judgement like this has annoyed you.

There is a completely different tone in this thread regarding how people have talked about Christians to how you have talked about homosexuals.


Just present some evidence. I do view gay people as equals. The judgement annoys me because it is wrong, the bakers did not discriminate. Most posts in this thread have mocked Christians - I view them as equals too (and Muslims come to that).

The cake design comparisons you gave all related to horrendous and criminal acts, and certainly not groups protected in law so were intentionally inflammatory rather than illustrative. Of course your message about gay people all moving to their own town and writing their 'silly slogans' on cakes was intentionally mocking.

What is your view of gay marriage? For a start you refered to that as 'marriage', so I take it you don't view it as being 'equal'.

My whole point is that businesses gay or straight, christian or atheist should just get on with business. We see that in not doing so, it opens the door for people with an axe to grind at certain groups. Uniformity of service is good for society.

As for what people believe outside of a business context, I move in the other direction. I think people getting arrested for stupid offensive twitter comments are just low hanging fruit rather than a public concern.


Of course your comparisons were all valid and mild?

Surely you can see that the setting up of gay towns was a joke? Although I would think some the more extreme gay activists would think it a good idea!

My view of gay 'marriage': They can enter into any form of partnership they like as long as it is legal (same sex-marriage is not in Northern Ireland). I have no strong views about it, good luck to them. I personally do not think such unions are true marriages, as a marriage is between a man and a woman; but if it makes them happy to call it a marriage, fine. They can have all the legal benefits that arise from being married, but they should not expect everyone to consider them as married in the real sense of the word.

Businesses should not be forced to get involved in political controversies and should not be prosecuted for discrimination when no discrimination took place.

Edited by derben (23 May 2015 6.45pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 23 May 15 6.58pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 6.44pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 6.17pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.58pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.52pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.46pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.41pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.


You seem to enjoy mocking gay people more than most in our more enlighted and educated society, so I'm sure there's a 'traditional' muslim version of you in one of these countries cheering on one abuse of another.


When have I mocked gay people? And are you suggesting I support Islamic persecution of gay people, or indeed any persecution of gay people?

Anything I pointed out you would pass off as a 'joke' so there's no point. Suffice to say you have, and it certainly seems that you don't view gay people as equals, which is really why a judgement like this has annoyed you.

There is a completely different tone in this thread regarding how people have talked about Christians to how you have talked about homosexuals.


Just present some evidence. I do view gay people as equals. The judgement annoys me because it is wrong, the bakers did not discriminate. Most posts in this thread have mocked Christians - I view them as equals too (and Muslims come to that).

The cake design comparisons you gave all related to horrendous and criminal acts, and certainly not groups protected in law so were intentionally inflammatory rather than illustrative. Of course your message about gay people all moving to their own town and writing their 'silly slogans' on cakes was intentionally mocking.

What is your view of gay marriage? For a start you refered to that as 'marriage', so I take it you don't view it as being 'equal'.

My whole point is that businesses gay or straight, christian or atheist should just get on with business. We see that in not doing so, it opens the door for people with an axe to grind at certain groups. Uniformity of service is good for society.

As for what people believe outside of a business context, I move in the other direction. I think people getting arrested for stupid offensive twitter comments are just low hanging fruit rather than a public concern.


Of course your comparisons were all valid and mild?

Surely you can see that the setting up of gay towns was a joke? Although I would think some the more extreme gay activists would think it a good idea!

My view of gay 'marriage': They can enter into any form of partnership they like as long as it is legal (same sex-marriage is not in Northern Ireland). I have no strong views about it, good luck to them. I personally do not think such unions are true marriages, as a marriage is between a man and a woman; but if it makes them happy to call it a marriage, fine. They can have all the legal benefits that arise from being married, but they should not expect everyone to consider them as married in the real sense of the word.

Businesses should not be forced to get involved in political controversies and should not be prosecuted for discrimination when no discrimination took place.

Edited by derben (23 May 2015 6.45pm)

The only religious comment I made related to how Mormonism, specifically the church of LDS used to have an issue with black people. They were not allowed to be ordained as priests. It was said as a statement of fact. I made no jokes about religious people and didn't seek to mock religious people nor do I have any interest in doing so. A person's worth is not dictated by their faith or lack of.

Of course once gay marriage does pass in NI, there will eventually be no 'gay marriage' or 'equal rights' cakes on account that concepts of gay marriage will no longer really exist, much in the same way that people don't go off and get an 'interacial marriage', or a 'black marriage' or 'white marriage'. Our children and grand children will all look back to this stuff and be utterly perplexed by our attitudes.


Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 7.02pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 23 May 15 8.01pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 6.58pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 6.44pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 6.17pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.58pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.52pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.46pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 5.41pm

Quote derben at 23 May 2015 5.12pm

Quote imbored at 23 May 2015 4.14pm

They should move their business to Republican of Ireland. Lots of gay cakes to refuse to design today I suspect.

Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 4.42pm)

Can't wait for the first Islamic country to approve it - or even make being gay legal, or perhaps dropping the death penalty and long imprisonment sentences that are meted out to gay people.


You seem to enjoy mocking gay people more than most in our more enlighted and educated society, so I'm sure there's a 'traditional' muslim version of you in one of these countries cheering on one abuse of another.


When have I mocked gay people? And are you suggesting I support Islamic persecution of gay people, or indeed any persecution of gay people?

Anything I pointed out you would pass off as a 'joke' so there's no point. Suffice to say you have, and it certainly seems that you don't view gay people as equals, which is really why a judgement like this has annoyed you.

There is a completely different tone in this thread regarding how people have talked about Christians to how you have talked about homosexuals.


Just present some evidence. I do view gay people as equals. The judgement annoys me because it is wrong, the bakers did not discriminate. Most posts in this thread have mocked Christians - I view them as equals too (and Muslims come to that).

The cake design comparisons you gave all related to horrendous and criminal acts, and certainly not groups protected in law so were intentionally inflammatory rather than illustrative. Of course your message about gay people all moving to their own town and writing their 'silly slogans' on cakes was intentionally mocking.

What is your view of gay marriage? For a start you refered to that as 'marriage', so I take it you don't view it as being 'equal'.

My whole point is that businesses gay or straight, christian or atheist should just get on with business. We see that in not doing so, it opens the door for people with an axe to grind at certain groups. Uniformity of service is good for society.

As for what people believe outside of a business context, I move in the other direction. I think people getting arrested for stupid offensive twitter comments are just low hanging fruit rather than a public concern.


Of course your comparisons were all valid and mild?

Surely you can see that the setting up of gay towns was a joke? Although I would think some the more extreme gay activists would think it a good idea!

My view of gay 'marriage': They can enter into any form of partnership they like as long as it is legal (same sex-marriage is not in Northern Ireland). I have no strong views about it, good luck to them. I personally do not think such unions are true marriages, as a marriage is between a man and a woman; but if it makes them happy to call it a marriage, fine. They can have all the legal benefits that arise from being married, but they should not expect everyone to consider them as married in the real sense of the word.

Businesses should not be forced to get involved in political controversies and should not be prosecuted for discrimination when no discrimination took place.

Edited by derben (23 May 2015 6.45pm)

The only religious comment I made related to how Mormonism, specifically the church of LDS used to have an issue with black people. They were not allowed to be ordained as priests. It was said as a statement of fact. I made no jokes about religious people and didn't seek to mock religious people nor do I have any interest in doing so. A person's worth is not dictated by their faith or lack of.

Of course once gay marriage does pass in NI, there will eventually be no 'gay marriage' or 'equal rights' cakes on account that concepts of gay marriage will no longer really exist, much in the same way that people don't go off and get an 'interacial marriage', or a 'black marriage' or 'white marriage'. Our children and grand children will all look back to this stuff and be utterly perplexed by our attitudes.


Edited by imbored (23 May 2015 7.02pm)

I fully accept that you have not mocked religion, I was thinking of one or two comments made by other posters. By the way, I am not religious myself. However, I do think there are double standards operating in society as Christian beliefs and standards are readily mocked and eroded whereas other religions are given every indulgence.

Wouldn't hold your breath on Northern Ireland allowing it while the DUP holds sway there.

If not 'gay marriage' cakes, extreme gay rights activists will want 'gay positive discrimination' cakes or something similar, or perhaps 'homophobics should be imprisoned' cakes, and no doubt the likes of Isobel Brownlie will support them.

I agree that our children and grandchildren will look back on stuff and be perplexed with the likes of Carol Thatcher being sacked, the John Terry show trial by the FA, an eighty-five-year-old woman being handcuffed and arrested for saying 'go back to your own country' to some people, etc.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 13 of 16 < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Weatherspoons fined for banning p*****