You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > g4s
April 26 2024 6.38pm

g4s

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

 

View dannyh's Profile dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 13 Jan 16 12.26pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Jan 2016 10.22am

I'm a firm believer that certain functions of state belong entirely in the auspices and funding of the state.

Something like the Olympics had ridiculous security contracts that simply overloaded the security systems (like vetting) by making absurd requirements on staff by government, which it just happens to charge for.

In reality, the expectations placed on G4S for the Olympics were unachievable by anyone, but it allows the government a paid scapegoat that isn't a minister, and G4S is quite happy with this arrangement. In return they profit very nicely from an arrangement that essentially absolves the state of blame.


Meanwhile Squaddies get f***ed over again, and again and get massive reduction in numbers and pay rates.

If Cameron ever wanted to turn a staunch conservative away from the party he's doing a sterling job.

Blokes a c*** as are most if not all of his ministers.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jan 16 12.42pm

Quote dannyh at 13 Jan 2016 12.26pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Jan 2016 10.22am

I'm a firm believer that certain functions of state belong entirely in the auspices and funding of the state.

Something like the Olympics had ridiculous security contracts that simply overloaded the security systems (like vetting) by making absurd requirements on staff by government, which it just happens to charge for.

In reality, the expectations placed on G4S for the Olympics were unachievable by anyone, but it allows the government a paid scapegoat that isn't a minister, and G4S is quite happy with this arrangement. In return they profit very nicely from an arrangement that essentially absolves the state of blame.


Meanwhile Squaddies get f***ed over again, and again and get massive reduction in numbers and pay rates.

If Cameron ever wanted to turn a staunch conservative away from the party he's doing a sterling job.

Blokes a c*** as are most if not all of his ministers.

Pretty much. The army, and police, have been repeatedly taken up the brown canal because they don't have the capacity for industrial action, and 'the management' (senior officers) have a fairly cushy deal or number when it comes to third party contractors.

But the rank and file in the military are being continually hammered, previously by labour and now by the conservatives - and the reason is simple, they have no come back.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Cucking Funt's Profile Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 13 Jan 16 1.09pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jan 2016 9.20am

How the bloody hell do companies like this keep getting contracts?

[Link]


Given that it's quite hard to get sent to a YOI, it's probably the first time the little turds have had any discipline.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mr_Gristle's Profile Mr_Gristle Flag In the land of Whelk Eaters 13 Jan 16 1.48pm Send a Private Message to Mr_Gristle Add Mr_Gristle as a friend

Welcome to the reality of outsourced Britain.

"Lessoons learned, blah blah blah". No material comeback to the contract provider (G4S in this case) and not something to whip up a media frenzy about as outsourcing = good.

Would the reporting differ if this was a council-run establishment in, say, Doncaster? You betcha.

 


Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Sash's Profile The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 13 Jan 16 2.59pm Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Jan 2016 12.02pm

Quote Murray's the man at 13 Jan 2016 10.27am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Jan 2016 10.22am

I'm a firm believer that certain functions of state belong entirely in the auspices and funding of the state.

Something like the Olympics had ridiculous security contracts that simply overloaded the security systems (like vetting) by making absurd requirements on staff by government, which it just happens to charge for.

In reality, the expectations placed on G4S for the Olympics were unachievable by anyone, but it allows the government a paid scapegoat that isn't a minister, and G4S is quite happy with this arrangement. In return they profit very nicely from an arrangement that essentially absolves the state of blame.


Security companies see sport events as a cash cow. Lookat the car oark stewards at Palace. All of a sudden you need 30+ people doing the job of 10

Problem of the Olympics was that even the people working in the hotdog stalls needed to be security cleared... The system of clearance just isn't capable of coping with that level of pressure. It takes several weeks when there is just a normal level of requests.

But yeah the Olympics employed 'security and stewards' on a scale that would make football look tame. Most whom were just average Joes given a day or twos instruction.


I worked on the Olympics in conjunction with the Met - you wont believe how many people didn't get full clearance - from coach drivers to cleaners.

The volume of 'extra' people required overloaded the vetting system

I have also worked for G4S in the past - I could tell some stories


Edited by The Sash (13 Jan 2016 3.00pm)

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Sash's Profile The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 13 Jan 16 3.03pm Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Quote Cucking Funt at 13 Jan 2016 1.09pm

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jan 2016 9.20am

How the bloody hell do companies like this keep getting contracts?

[Link]


Given that it's quite hard to get sent to a YOI, it's probably the first time the little turds have had any discipline.

We need a return to the good old days


You f***in' well do now, slag! There's no dolly mixtures here, poofter! I'm the Daddy and don't you ever forget it, right?

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mr Palaceman's Profile Mr Palaceman Flag 13 Jan 16 3.08pm Send a Private Message to Mr Palaceman Add Mr Palaceman as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jan 2016 9.20am

How the bloody hell do companies like this keep getting contracts?

[Link]


Because the owners are mates with those in charge. The prison service should not be run privately.

If I remember correctly, G4S have the largest private army in the world.

 


"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead"

Stan Laurel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jan 16 4.15pm

Quote The Sash at 13 Jan 2016 3.03pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 13 Jan 2016 1.09pm

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jan 2016 9.20am

How the bloody hell do companies like this keep getting contracts?

[Link]


Given that it's quite hard to get sent to a YOI, it's probably the first time the little turds have had any discipline.

We need a return to the good old days


You f***in' well do now, slag! There's no dolly mixtures here, poofter! I'm the Daddy and don't you ever forget it, right?

Scum.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 13 Jan 16 4.20pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Jan 2016 11.56am

Blair favoured Capita and I guess Cameron likes G4S.

I don't know if it is the PM's preference but the Civil Service does tend to contract with ex-civil service and it is damned hard to get on a preferred provider list.

Recollecting my expriences with Capita at the time, is that Public Services initially contract with them, and when the business came up for retender it goes somewhere else to get the mess fixed.


Edited by pefwin (13 Jan 2016 4.20pm)

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 13 Jan 16 4.31pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote pefwin at 13 Jan 2016 4.20pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Jan 2016 11.56am

Blair favoured Capita and I guess Cameron likes G4S.

I don't know if it is the PM's preference but the Civil Service does tend to contract with ex-civil service and it is damned hard to get on a preferred provider list.

Recollecting my expriences with Capita at the time, is that Public Services initially contract with them, and when the business came up for retender it goes somewhere else to get the mess fixed.


Edited by pefwin (13 Jan 2016 4.20pm)

Yep. Serco was sandwiched between those two.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jan 16 4.45pm

Quote pefwin at 13 Jan 2016 4.20pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Jan 2016 11.56am

Blair favoured Capita and I guess Cameron likes G4S.

I don't know if it is the PM's preference but the Civil Service does tend to contract with ex-civil service and it is damned hard to get on a preferred provider list.

Recollecting my expriences with Capita at the time, is that Public Services initially contract with them, and when the business came up for retender it goes somewhere else to get the mess fixed.


Edited by pefwin (13 Jan 2016 4.20pm)

Usually companies get on the list by hiring a number of ex-civil servants and ministers.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Superfly's Profile Superfly Flag The sun always shines in Catford 13 Jan 16 5.00pm Send a Private Message to Superfly Add Superfly as a friend

Quote Stuk at 13 Jan 2016 4.31pm

Quote pefwin at 13 Jan 2016 4.20pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Jan 2016 11.56am

Blair favoured Capita and I guess Cameron likes G4S.

I don't know if it is the PM's preference but the Civil Service does tend to contract with ex-civil service and it is damned hard to get on a preferred provider list.

Recollecting my expriences with Capita at the time, is that Public Services initially contract with them, and when the business came up for retender it goes somewhere else to get the mess fixed.


Edited by pefwin (13 Jan 2016 4.20pm)

Yep. Serco was sandwiched between those two.


Is that Al Pacino?

 


Lend me a Tenor

31 May to 3 June 2017

John McIntosh Arts Centre
London Oratory School
SW6 1RX

with Superfly in the chorus
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > g4s