The Falklands

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Mar 16 11.40am
Originally posted by matt_himself Simply not true about British military capability in the Falklands: [Link] Any Argentine invasion would be crushed. That's why they needed the extra 150 miles, to ensure the pedellos would have a chance of reaching the beach. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 30 Mar 16 11.40am

Originally posted by matt_himself

Simply not true about British military capability in the Falklands:

[Link]

Any Argentine invasion would be crushed.

That's why they needed the extra 150 miles, to ensure the pedellos would have a chance of reaching the beach.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

beagle pom tiddly om pom pom 30 Mar 16 12.06pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 That's why they needed the extra 150 miles, to ensure the pedellos would have a chance of reaching the beach. Who wants filthy nonce pedellos on the beach? Hang 'em I say. When the time comes, I want die just like my Dad - at peace and asleep. Not screaming and terrified. Like his passengers.
Alert a moderator to this post

beagle

pom tiddly om pom pom 30 Mar 16 12.06pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

That's why they needed the extra 150 miles, to ensure the pedellos would have a chance of reaching the beach.

Who wants filthy nonce pedellos on the beach? Hang 'em I say.

When the time comes, I want die just like my Dad - at peace and asleep.
Not screaming and terrified.
Like his passengers.

Alert a moderator to this post

NickinOX Sailing country. 30 Mar 16 12.17pm
Originally posted by Willo Very true. And we can always rely on our friends "Across the pond" ! Britain did last time. If you come to a fork in the road, take it.
Alert a moderator to this post

NickinOX

Sailing country. 30 Mar 16 12.17pm

Originally posted by Willo

Very true.

And we can always rely on our friends "Across the pond" !

Britain did last time.

If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 30 Mar 16 1.00pm
What a lot of nonsense. Firstly, Argentina has no legitimate claim on the Falklands. Secondly, America would not help us officially in a conflict over the Falklands just like last time. Thirdly, we would not surrender the Falklands or lose a fight with Argentina simply because our naval capacity is seemingly reduced. Of course if Jeremy Corbyn and his rag tag band of lefty loons got into power (which they won't)we might offer them Scotland as well as surrender. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (30 Mar 2016 1.02pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

30 Mar 16 1.00pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

What a lot of nonsense.

Firstly, Argentina has no legitimate claim on the Falklands.

Secondly, America would not help us officially in a conflict over the Falklands just like last time.

Thirdly, we would not surrender the Falklands or lose a fight with Argentina simply because our naval capacity is seemingly reduced.

Of course if Jeremy Corbyn and his rag tag band of lefty loons got into power (which they won't)we might offer them Scotland as well as surrender.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (30 Mar 2016 1.02pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande bedford 30 Mar 16 1.20pm
My son is out there at the moment with 2 companies of his regiment,I,m sure they would kick the argues arses,s for a while.....not long mind. They do like as good scrap. Edited by elgrande (30 Mar 2016 1.22pm) always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.
Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande

bedford 30 Mar 16 1.20pm

My son is out there at the moment with 2 companies of his regiment,I,m sure they would kick the argues arses,s for a while.....not long mind.
They do like as good scrap.

Edited by elgrande (30 Mar 2016 1.22pm)

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Mar 16 1.22pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger What a lot of nonsense. Firstly, Argentina has no legitimate claim on the Falklands. Secondly, America would not help us officially in a conflict over the Falklands just like last time. Thirdly, we would not surrender the Falklands or lose a fight with Argentina simply because our naval capacity is seemingly reduced. Of course if Jeremy Corbyn and his rag tag band of lefty loons got into power (which they won't)we might offer them Scotland as well as surrender. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (30 Mar 2016 1.02pm) Would they want it. I must admit, you're making a compelling argument for surrender of the Islands.... The only people with any real and meaningful claim over the Falklands are the people who live there. They had their say. Everyone else, is wrong. Finally our naval capacity might be less, but the Argentine military capacity is monumentally less. Turns out, Military Juntas spend most of their money on defence, and that's why they end up invading places like the Falklands, to distract from their domestic policy failures. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 30 Mar 16 1.22pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

What a lot of nonsense.

Firstly, Argentina has no legitimate claim on the Falklands.

Secondly, America would not help us officially in a conflict over the Falklands just like last time.

Thirdly, we would not surrender the Falklands or lose a fight with Argentina simply because our naval capacity is seemingly reduced.

Of course if Jeremy Corbyn and his rag tag band of lefty loons got into power (which they won't)we might offer them Scotland as well as surrender.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (30 Mar 2016 1.02pm)

Would they want it. I must admit, you're making a compelling argument for surrender of the Islands....

The only people with any real and meaningful claim over the Falklands are the people who live there. They had their say.

Everyone else, is wrong.

Finally our naval capacity might be less, but the Argentine military capacity is monumentally less. Turns out, Military Juntas spend most of their money on defence, and that's why they end up invading places like the Falklands, to distract from their domestic policy failures.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk Top half 30 Mar 16 1.25pm
Originally posted by Cannonball The UN have decided to increase the Argies territorial waters from 200 to 350 miles,which means the Falklands (and the oilfields near it) will fall under their jurisdiction...Will this lead to another war with us kicking their latino butts again ? No they haven't and no it won't. The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf is a group of experts established under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, but it is not a United Nations' Commission. and The Falkland Islands' government said the UN did not make changes in sovereignty in areas where the territory is disputed. Optimistic as ever
Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk

Top half 30 Mar 16 1.25pm

Originally posted by Cannonball

The UN have decided to increase the Argies territorial waters from 200 to 350 miles,which means the Falklands (and the oilfields near it) will fall under their jurisdiction...Will this lead to another war with us kicking their latino butts again ?

No they haven't and no it won't.

The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf is a group of experts established under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, but it is not a United Nations' Commission.

and

The Falkland Islands' government said the UN did not make changes in sovereignty in areas where the territory is disputed.

Optimistic as ever

Alert a moderator to this post

NickinOX Sailing country. 30 Mar 16 1.26pm
Originally posted by Stuk No they haven't and no it won't. The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf is a group of experts established under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, but it is not a United Nations' Commission. and The Falkland Islands' government said the UN did not make changes in sovereignty in areas where the territory is disputed. They are right, the report was clear in the issues of disputed sovereignty. It does not apply. The report was linked in the original article. Edited by NickinOX (30 Mar 2016 1.27pm) If you come to a fork in the road, take it.
Alert a moderator to this post

NickinOX

Sailing country. 30 Mar 16 1.26pm

Originally posted by Stuk

No they haven't and no it won't.

The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf is a group of experts established under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, but it is not a United Nations' Commission.

and

The Falkland Islands' government said the UN did not make changes in sovereignty in areas where the territory is disputed.

They are right, the report was clear in the issues of disputed sovereignty. It does not apply. The report was linked in the original article.

Edited by NickinOX (30 Mar 2016 1.27pm)

If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 30 Mar 16 3.48pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Would they want it. I must admit, you're making a compelling argument for surrender of the Islands.... The only people with any real and meaningful claim over the Falklands are the people who live there. They had their say. Everyone else, is wrong. Finally our naval capacity might be less, but the Argentine military capacity is monumentally less. Turns out, Military Juntas spend most of their money on defence, and that's why they end up invading places like the Falklands, to distract from their domestic policy failures. Racist.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

30 Mar 16 3.48pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Would they want it. I must admit, you're making a compelling argument for surrender of the Islands....

The only people with any real and meaningful claim over the Falklands are the people who live there. They had their say.

Everyone else, is wrong.

Racist.

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Mar 16 4.13pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Racist. but in this case justified. Scotland - its the land designed to be inhospitable. The weather, the geography , the national cuisine and of course the people. I just feel sorry for refugees that end up there. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 30 Mar 16 4.13pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Racist.

but in this case justified. Scotland - its the land designed to be inhospitable. The weather, the geography , the national cuisine and of course the people.

I just feel sorry for refugees that end up there.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 30 Mar 16 7.12pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 but in this case justified. Scotland - its the land designed to be inhospitable. The weather, the geography , the national cuisine and of course the people. I just feel sorry for refugees that end up there. That's why any self respecting Scotsman left long ago, leaving only an underclass of wheezy, overweight gingers with a massive chip on their shoulder exclaiming see you Jimmy after too many Tennant's Extras.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

30 Mar 16 7.12pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

but in this case justified. Scotland - its the land designed to be inhospitable. The weather, the geography , the national cuisine and of course the people.

I just feel sorry for refugees that end up there.

That's why any self respecting Scotsman left long ago, leaving only an underclass of wheezy, overweight gingers with a massive chip on their shoulder exclaiming see you Jimmy after too many Tennant's Extras.

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 30 Mar 16 7.28pm
Most Nobel Prize Winners relative to its size in the world ever AND with 75% of the population permanently drunk. Scotland p1sses on England scientifically, intellectually and alcoholically. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 30 Mar 16 7.28pm

Most Nobel Prize Winners relative to its size in the world ever AND with 75% of the population permanently drunk.

Scotland p1sses on England scientifically, intellectually and alcoholically.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Falklands

Site Map

Sponsors