You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Ref: Neil Swarbrick & Boro Bench Reaction?
April 26 2024 8.28am

Ref: Neil Swarbrick & Boro Bench Reaction?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

 

View Dubai Eagle's Profile Dubai Eagle Online Flag 11 Sep 16 2.07pm Send a Private Message to Dubai Eagle Add Dubai Eagle as a friend

I watched the game on tv yesterday and for sure the main talking points are mentioned above- in addition it was interesting to see the borough player booked for rushing the ref to dispute the ( goal kick-corner) decision in line with the new rules but it seemed to me that as things progressed the 4th official was put under a whole lot of pressure from the borough bench ( more than I would call reasonable) to that end my question is dosent the 4th official get the same protection as the other 3 officials and if not why not also what should have been the appropriate punishment?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 11 Sep 16 2.10pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by coulsdoneagle

The holding was 100% seen by Swarbrick. Before the corners were taken he had nearly 10 seconds of looking at the box and seeing the blatant grabbing. If he didn't see it then he isn't up to the standard required to ref in the PL, if he did he needs to be consistent and follow the guidelines put in place before the season started.

Actually think last season was one of the poorest in terms of ref performances I can remember. This season already looks slightly better and I take my hat if to Mike Dean for his consistency.

Quick side note. If you want to talk about big game and referees bottling it, look no further than a certain Willo favourite missing a clear pen and a red in the Manchester derby.

Firstly, we don't really know what he saw or didn't see - there are a number of players in close proximity in the area at corners and the referee doesn't have the view from the TV gantry.

Secondly, a referee cannot give a penalty when the ball is not in play.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dodgerthai's Profile Dodgerthai Flag pattaya 11 Sep 16 2.18pm Send a Private Message to Dodgerthai Add Dodgerthai as a friend

It was funny when Flamini's first moment in a Palace shirt and even before he got on pitch was to get a team mate booked (Ward) for delaying throw in when he had a wristband on and official wouldn't let him on till it was cut off.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 11 Sep 16 2.21pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

I agree that we were unlucky not to get one for the holding on Dann - given how often they've been given thus far, it was pretty clear to see. Having said that, the Dann handball probably was as wel - we were lucky the ref was stood looking at his back, as it blocked his view of the contact with the ball.

The Zaha foul was definitely outside - quite clear on the replays.

I did think the reaction from the Boro bench was unnecessary - there was one genuine penalty appeal not given - the rest was just exaggerated appeals for minor things.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View bodge's Profile bodge Flag 11 Sep 16 3.29pm Send a Private Message to bodge Add bodge as a friend

The foul on Benteke should have been a yellow but that and a poor non advantage apart he got most things right. No way were the hand ball shouts deliberate the Dann holding one was one you would not expect to get away from home.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View merganser's Profile merganser Flag 11 Sep 16 10.11pm Send a Private Message to merganser Add merganser as a friend

Straying from the thread somewhat but still on the subject of refereeing:

1) Why is Rooney allowed to exploit his high profile (eg as England captain) by maintaining a perpetual dialogue with referees during matches? He has a winge on any decision which meets with his disapproval. Refs should crack down on this behaviour.

2) It also rankles to hear Mourinho refer to Clattenburg by his first name. Even though he criticised the ref following the Manchester derby, his use of first name was a ploy. In effect. He was saying: " Mark is a friend who made a couple of mistakes, but I'm sure he will compensate for that the next time he referees one of our matches." It was a way of seeking to compromise Clattenburg ahead of future matches when he refs Man U

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Inapickle Flag South West 11 Sep 16 10.22pm

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

Apologies if this matter has been covered elsewhere?

I watched the whole game with Boro live and also watched extensive highlights on Sky last night.

My conclusion is that Swarbrick is definitely a referee that currently bottles making big decisions in either penalty area.

He must have seen Ayala manhandling Scott Dann in the 1st half at corners and if Mike Dean was the ref we would have had 2 pens.... and he would have been sent off with 2 yellow cards.

A massive blow then that we allowed the same player time and room to head their equaliser.... I was gutted we didn't block him off/grab his shirt as it was clear Swarbrick was never going to award a penalty for that offence.

2nd half it was our turn to benefit from Swarbrick's reluctance to point to the spot... Scott Dann's hand looked like it was in contact with the ball, and Zaha's late challenge in injury time looked inside the box to me.

From my perspective justice was done though... he missed 2 penalties for both teams.

Why Boro's coaching assistants were giving the 4th official so much grief I don't know... obviously they had selective memory loss when it came to their players "cheating".

It also begs the question why the FA/Referees association aren't insisting all referees act in unison. Clearly Mike Dean aims to stamp out holding at corners and is not afraid to award penalties and dish out cards.

Other referees like Swarbrick are still allowing the status quo to continue and are bottling the chance to follow Read's example.

Clearly this anomaly cannot be allowed to continue?

Edited by Hoof Hearted (11 Sep 2016 11.27am)

..Danns arm would naturally come up as it did with his movement of bringing his leg up and the ball hit his leg anyway, Zaha was sooo outside the box you need specsavers and the holding of shirts happens every single time any two players come together in any dangerous incident, it is utterly down to the ref to judge whether any advantage has been had, refs need help with doing this job and one day they will get it, ferk knows when this is finally going to happen and with it the sin bin.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 12 Sep 16 9.44am

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted



The jury's out on Zaha's tackle - in my opinion and a few pundits it looked in and could/should have been a pen... but it's all about opinion and clearly we disagree on that issue.

If you are right, we were harshly treated by Swarbrick and could have had 2 penalties to their 1.

The main point I was making was the inconsistency of referees decisions and the FA/Referees Association failure to instill parity between them.

Either they all adopt Mike Dean's approach and penalise holding or let it go... you can't have referees applying different standards.

Depends on what you mean should. The ball was the only thing inside the box. Its a great 'pro' foul by Zaha, who earned us all three points with that and his game contributions. So by the law, it was a free kick. But morally, it was more grounds for a penalty than the one against Southampton, or where players are clipped going nowhere in the box.

The holding thing. It does need to be consistent, but there is an argument that we'll be having a lot of penalties each game. I think referees need to book players for this, rather than give a penalty. That way they can avoid 'deciding games' and it puts the blame squarely on the players actions.

Otherwise we could well reduce the next two seasons to penalty shoot outs between the two sides.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 12 Sep 16 9.45am

None of the hand balls were penalties. Sometimes they get given, but realistically, with the arms so close to the body, and in more or less natural positions, it would be harsh to give them.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View We are goin up!'s Profile We are goin up! Flag Coulsdon 12 Sep 16 10.14am Send a Private Message to We are goin up! Add We are goin up! as a friend

Was at the game and I thought the ref was pretty good at letting the play go. Hoof, you point out that Mike Dean gives loads of pens for holding in the box... I worry where this is going now they're "clamping down" on it. We're going to see more and more players taking a dive at corners to win a penalty (see Stoke at home last game week).

 


The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 12 Sep 16 12.51pm

Originally posted by becky


Zaha's tackle was clearly outside the box on MotD, from 3 different angles (even Shearer agreed that it was outside!).

The Boro bench were disputing (on 2 occasions) that Dann handled the ball in the area. Both times he had both his right foot and right arm out, and it was very difficult to see which actually touched the ball, although a different angle on one clearly showed that it was the boot and not the hand that got there first.

Disappointing response Becky...you should know better.

Concentrating on minor issues rather than the main point I was making about consistency at corners.

And the fact Shearer thought it wasn't a penalty confirms it probably was.... using the term "clearly" is a joke on your part too, it was very close either way and open to interpretation.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
citizensmudge Flag midlands 12 Sep 16 12.59pm

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

Disappointing response Becky...you should know better.

Concentrating on minor issues rather than the main point I was making about consistency at corners.

And the fact Shearer thought it wasn't a penalty confirms it probably was.... using the term "clearly" is a joke on your part too, it was very close either way and open to interpretation.

The very best of luck at the Most Patronising Comment Ever Awards I think your a shoe in!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Ref: Neil Swarbrick & Boro Bench Reaction?