Buckingham Palace to get £369m refurbishment
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 PALACE FOR EVER  London 18 Nov 16 2.05pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
This is the kind of use of public money that annoys me. Surely they can contribute a good percentage of this? I'm almost certain that it will be a lot more than this as well. I'm sure they don't know anything about the value of money 775 rooms, sounds a good place for hide and seek.
The pyramid to beat all pyramids!! Find out what team is in which division, eg which division is Coppull United in? |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Kermit8  Hevon 18 Nov 16 2.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Why we send hundreds of millions of quid over to SW1 I have no idea. That's money that could be used for the NHS. Equivalent to £500,000 per room. Bargain!
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 18 Nov 16 2.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It's dwarfed by the £3bn they're spending on the Palace of Westminster. C*nts.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Temps Cronx 18 Nov 16 2.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I can see the builder now, strolling around, cap on the back of his head. Shaking his head and blowing his cheeks out, "I dunno, looks like you've had some right cowboys in here. And you want it done when?" I like to think so anyway!
Dyslexics of the world, UNTIE!! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 18 Nov 16 2.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
They spend more than £150,000 per month on maintenance for Holyrood already, and that was only built 12 years ago at a cost of £414m. They estimated it would cost between £10 & £40m Edited by Stuk (18 Nov 2016 2.39pm)
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 18 Nov 16 3.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Temps
I can see the builder now, strolling around, cap on the back of his head. Shaking his head and blowing his cheeks out, "I dunno, looks like you've had some right cowboys in here. And you want it done when?" I like to think so anyway! ....that sounds like Casual!!
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 18 Nov 16 3.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I'm struggling with this one. The institution of Royalty is bonkers to me but it represents Britain. The Royal buildings are also a symbol of Britain. It could be argued that the expense is in the public interest as is maintaining the royals themselves. The alternative is a country who's iconography and architecture is owned by the Chinese, Americans or the Arabs or one who's symbols of power are falling into ruin.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 18 Nov 16 3.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm struggling with this one. The institution of Royalty is bonkers to me but it represents Britain. The Royal buildings are also a symbol of Britain. It could be argued that the expense is in the public interest as is maintaining the royals themselves. The alternative is a country who's iconography and architecture is owned by the Chinese, Americans or the Arabs or one who's symbols of power are falling into ruin. You are right its bonkers but its far more important than the House of Commons IMO have you noticed tho that we are part Chinese owned? If the Queen wants to do her bit she can take in i********s
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Only joking.| .TUX. 18 Nov 16 4.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I'm all for preservation and maintenance of one of the most iconic buildings in the world, whoever happens to live there.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Y Ddraig Goch  In The Crowd 18 Nov 16 4.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The problem is, what is the alternative? Let them fall into complete disrepair and build "affordable housing"? Both the Houses of Parliament and Buckingham Palace form part of what attracts visitors to London. Irrespective of whether we keep the royal family.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 18 Nov 16 4.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Presumably it needs the money as they have not kept it up though the years still lets cut and cut until the roof falls in. Anyway we couldn't have had a better monarch why not abolish parliament and save the 3bn?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 18 Nov 16 4.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Historic Royal Palaces (Tower of London, Hampton court Palace and some others) are self financed so it can be done. I have no problem with a £400 million refurb of Buckingham Palace but maybe open it up for more than 7 weeks a year to help finance it.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.