This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
He's good going forward and very very quick but he doesn't defend so i don't think he's what we need at all. I'd much rather have a defensive minded player.
|
|
|
Originally posted by RyWa
I think he's very good going forward and grabs the odd goal, somewhat nervous about his denfending capabilities though. He's always managed to shackle Zaha effectively
|
|
|
Would rather we got one of the other lbs were linked with. This guy is a nightmare at the back, luckily for him his pace gets him out of trouble.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
He's always managed to shackle Zaha effectively Exactly what I thought. Not sure where this not being able to defend myth originates from.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
He's always managed to shackle Zaha effectively ^^^^^ This... everytime we've played the Mackams Van Aanholt has had Wilfred in his pocket.
Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!! |
|
|
Originally posted by Ali_Campbell
You only have to read what the Sunderland fans think of him? Also two of the goals we scored at their place were mistakes by him. He didn't clear a long ball up to him, which fell to Lesley to score. Then despite initially tracking jimmy mac, he ducted to let him score. Big Sam won't buy him because he knows he doesn't have the concentration levels required when defending. He didn't buy him for Sunderland.It was Poyet who bought him for £1.5 Mill. If my memory serves me well, Allardyce's only signings at Sunderland were Harper, Eboue, Kone, Kirschoff and Khazri.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
He didn't buy him for Sunderland.It was Poyet who bought him for £1.5 Mill. If you read the post properly instead of using it as an excuse to post your usual trivia whether relevant or not you would have seen that the previous poster didn't say that Sam Allardyce bought him but that he knows him as he managed him at Sunderland
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
Exactly what I thought. Not sure where this not being able to defend myth originates from. It's no myth. Look at Sunderland's main forum, they are very scathing in their opinion. These are the people who watch him week in week out. His defending is abysmal but he's good going forward.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
If you read the post properly instead of using it as an excuse to post your usual trivia whether relevant or not you would have seen that the previous poster didn't say that Sam Allardyce bought him but that he knows him as he managed him at Sunderland I read the post properly.My sentiments were that Sam didn't even buy him for Sunderland - he inherited him.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle
It's no myth. Look at Sunderland's main forum, they are very scathing in their opinion. These are the people who watch him week in week out. His defending is abysmal but he's good going forward. Which was what I posted a while ago but in the minds of some I "Googled" it I do watch players closely and listen to those who know them better than me. Edited by Willo (01 Jan 2017 1.26pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle
It's no myth. Look at Sunderland's main forum, they are very scathing in their opinion. These are the people who watch him week in week out. His defending is abysmal but he's good going forward. In fairness though not many full backs are that special at defending and surely he can't be any worse than Kelly.
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
In fairness though not many full backs are that special at defending and surely he can't be any worse than Kelly. He would be a big upgrade on Fryers or Kelly. Probably better than any of our current options.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Which was what I posted a while ago but in the minds of some I "Googled" it I do watch players closely and listen to those who know them better than me. Edited by Willo (01 Jan 2017 1.26pm) Perhaps if you posted less sh*te and more content then you wouldn't be dismissed as a plagiarist and a fool. Quality, not quantity.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
A Sunderland supporting friend doesn't rate him as highly as a lot seem to. His main problem seems to be consistency. Almost Souare-esque great going forward and average defender. I suppose the question is what do you want from your full backs. WTF is that??????
van Aanholt in the Premier League: 8 goals and 4 assists in the last 4 thousand and 5 hundred minutes. And he was great before that in the Eredivisie too. Back on topic, I don't see HOW Palace could transfer van Aanholt. He'd be worth at least 10 million and Sunderland will hang on to him desperately to avoid relegation.
Edited by mattteo (04 Jan 2017 4.02pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by mattteo
WTF is that??????
Back on topic, I don't see HOW Palace could transfer van Aanholt. He'd be worth at least 10 million and Sunderland will hang on to him desperately to avoid relegation.
These are all good choices. We certainly need a good leftsided player pdq. If we lose out to Leicester with Brady, then my personal fan's punt would be Charlie Taylor of Leeds - but Leeds unlikely to let one of their better players go since they have a decent shout of promotion themselves. Second favorite: Van Aarnholt
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.