You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Will you miss free speech when it's gone?
April 26 2024 9.34pm

Will you miss free speech when it's gone?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

 

OhthisbloodyPC Flag 09 Jan 17 5.40pm

We are about to lose one of the great liberties of this country, thanks to a sort of Philanderer's Law

Alan Partridge, crisp salesman Gary Lineker, Oswald Mosely's son and Hugh Grant are all pressurising for the freedoms we took for granted to be abolished, just in case they leave their wives or sleep with some prostitutes and it gets in the papers.

It looks like the law is going to go through

Will you miss free speech when it's gone?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Y Ddraig Goch's Profile Y Ddraig Goch Flag In The Crowd 09 Jan 17 5.42pm Send a Private Message to Y Ddraig Goch Add Y Ddraig Goch as a friend

Not sure free speech and tittle tattle are necessarily the same thing

 


the dignified don't even enter in the game

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View becky's Profile becky Flag over the moon 09 Jan 17 5.51pm Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

Free speech went years ago - think he died in the same accident as his friend Common Sense

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
OhthisbloodyPC Flag 09 Jan 17 6.15pm

Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch

Not sure free speech and tittle tattle are necessarily the same thing


One man's tittle is another man's Tattle

But it should not be governed by the briefs* of Hugh Grant


(* briefs in the legal sense)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View eagleman13's Profile eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 09 Jan 17 6.19pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Im only allowed 'free speech' when the (ex)wife/partner/daughter/various other females allow me to

 


I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold,
When a blind man cries, Lord, he feels it from his soul.
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Michaelawt85's Profile Michaelawt85 Flag Bexley 09 Jan 17 7.02pm Send a Private Message to Michaelawt85 Add Michaelawt85 as a friend

Originally posted by eagleman13

Im only allowed 'free speech' when the (ex)wife/partner/daughter/various other females allow me to

Silence!

 


When I was a young girl my Mother said to me.. You listen here kid you're CPFC

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View eagleman13's Profile eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 09 Jan 17 7.12pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Michaelawt85

Silence!

YES Miss

 


I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold,
When a blind man cries, Lord, he feels it from his soul.
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Ray in Houston's Profile Ray in Houston Flag Houston 09 Jan 17 7.53pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch

Not sure free speech and tittle tattle are necessarily the same thing


Tittle-tattle is an annoying sub-set of free speech.

Edited by Ray in Houston (09 Jan 2017 7.54pm)

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 10 Jan 17 9.39am

Free speech really only protects you from the state and apparatus of state, not other individuals legal recourse.

Also the fourth estate is protected under freedoms of the press, provided its a news story or has 'public interest'.

There is a balancing act to be had between the right to privacy / free speech and the freedom of the press.

Tabloid journalism just demeans the notion of free speech as a means of creating profit, without liability.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
OhthisbloodyPC Flag 10 Jan 17 10.18am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Free speech really only protects you from the state and apparatus of state, not other individuals legal recourse.

Also the fourth estate is protected under freedoms of the press, provided its a news story or has 'public interest'.

There is a balancing act to be had between the right to privacy / free speech and the freedom of the press.

Tabloid journalism just demeans the notion of free speech as a means of creating profit, without liability.


Who is to decide what's 'in the public interest'?

I don't want that power in the hands of a few people. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, as they say.

I'd rather have a free press than an authoritarian regime and repressed citizens.

Nuts to Hugh Grant and his sensitivities.

I don't want news blackouts imposed just because Steve Coogan doesn't like it known that he likes coke and hookers, and Gary Lineker needs to keep his brand polished.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 10 Jan 17 11.01am

Originally posted by OhthisbloodyPC


Who is to decide what's 'in the public interest'?

I don't want that power in the hands of a few people. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, as they say.

I'd rather have a free press than an authoritarian regime and repressed citizens.

Nuts to Hugh Grant and his sensitivities.

I don't want news blackouts imposed just because Steve Coogan doesn't like it known that he likes coke and hookers, and Gary Lineker needs to keep his brand polished.


Public interest would be a genuine news story, rather than a matter that affects only the private individuals and their life.

We don't have a free press, its largely owned by large multi-national corporations.

The press has a responsibility to report news, not moral judgements on individuals private lives - Indeed forcing the Press to focus on news, rather than 'interest stories' is in societies best interest, as it could actually work to save journalism.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Cucking Funt's Profile Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 10 Jan 17 12.03pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

The press only have themselves to blame. They have repeatedly shown that they're incapable of regulating themselves, as the output of the Mail and the red-tops demonstrate on an almost daily basis.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Will you miss free speech when it's gone?