You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Lost our identity, thanks to parish
April 26 2024 9.16am

Lost our identity, thanks to parish

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 20 of 23 < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 >

 

View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 02 Sep 17 1.33pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by the silurian

Too many people blaming SP for not getting rid of the deadwood...Mutch, Chungy etc BUT if nobody wants them what is he supposed to do? They all have contracts and will just sit on them til they run out if no one wants to buy them.

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I haven't seen anyone blaming SP for not managing to get rid of the players that you mentioned as we are all aware of the situation regarding contracts.

Originally posted by the silurian

Well, if we cant shift the deadwood, we cant afford to buy new can we....remember Mutch sako chung are all on 40-50k a week, a not inconsiderable amount of money.....unlike Mr Corbyn Palace havent got a money tree, and have to comply with FFP so what do you suggest?

Too many people are just making up arguments for the sake of it with the above being a prime example of a silly argument that the poster cannot justify so he changes his argument midstream hoping that no-one will notice

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dangermouse's Profile Dangermouse Flag Hastings 02 Sep 17 1.35pm Send a Private Message to Dangermouse Add Dangermouse as a friend

Originally posted by Dan89

And this

Yes it is time SP came out and told us what is going on.

 


That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Den1923's Profile Den1923 Flag 02 Sep 17 1.54pm Send a Private Message to Den1923 Add Den1923 as a friend

Originally posted by Dangermouse

Players being injured and our poor home form points to a problem in club leadership. That's what you put.

you have got your posts mixed up with different subscribers on this thread, Parish has to be indirectly responsible for everything that happens at the club as he is the current Chairman and leader. The poor home form is due in the main to having far to many managers in the period, playing different system and players in various positions that often do not suite them. Consistency in Management will produce better results as the player are settled, know the system and perform much better. Steve Parish is responsible for Management appointments, so if they do not work out then it is him and him alone who has made the wrong choice. He also dabbles in deciding the style of football he wants to see which is often not matched by the money available to get the players who can play that way. The same can be said about transfers he finds decision making hard, he prevaricates far too much over decisions and we often lose out because he cannot make his mind up quick enough or we run out of time. The time taken to appoint the current manager was madness and in the end we were restricted to what was left available rather than having a choice of the best available. I cannot tell who should replace him as I'm just a concerned fan, I do not have any shareholding and it is only the club directors and shareholders who can decide who their next leader should be.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 02 Sep 17 2.50pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by crystal balls

Yes, the training ground is currently too small to accommodate both the first team and the academy; Parish has tried to buy Goals but the owner doesn't want to sell so part has been leased for the academy to train there. If the owner doesn't want to sell, what's Parish supposed to do, put a horse's head in his bed?

It must be funny living in your world, where everything you wish for comes true exactly when you want it!

Get real mate, your whining and moaning becomes awfully tiresome after a while.

No. Just some broken goal posts and/or some punctured footballs.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View the silurian's Profile the silurian Flag The garden of England.(not really) 02 Sep 17 3.08pm Send a Private Message to the silurian Add the silurian as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Too many people are just making up arguments for the sake of it with the above being a prime example of a silly argument that the poster cannot justify so he changes his argument midstream hoping that no-one will notice

please explain where i have changed and not justified

Ps excuse me for not realising that you know everything!!

Edited by the silurian (02 Sep 2017 3.12pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rikz's Profile rikz Flag Croydon 02 Sep 17 3.16pm Send a Private Message to rikz Add rikz as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Too many people are just making up arguments for the sake of it with the above being a prime example of a silly argument that the poster cannot justify so he changes his argument midstream hoping that no-one will notice

He actually makes a good point, why do you find it so hard to understand we have a wage budget we have to adhere to.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 02 Sep 17 3.44pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by rikz

He actually makes a good point, why do you find it so hard to understand we have a wage budget we have to adhere to.

I might well ask why do you find it so hard to understand what has been written rather than what you think has been written or what you wish had been written.

The point that he was making was nothing to do with wages as he was asking, and I quote, "Too many people blaming SP for not getting rid of the deadwood" to which I responded "I haven't seen anyone blaming SP for not managing to get rid of the players that you mentioned as we are all aware of the situation regarding contracts."

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rikz's Profile rikz Flag Croydon 02 Sep 17 3.58pm Send a Private Message to rikz Add rikz as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I might well ask why do you find it so hard to understand what has been written rather than what you think has been written or what you wish had been written.

The point that he was making was nothing to do with wages as he was asking, and I quote, "Too many people blaming SP for not getting rid of the deadwood" to which I responded "I haven't seen anyone blaming SP for not managing to get rid of the players that you mentioned as we are all aware of the situation regarding contracts."

What's so hard to understand that he was making the point about not being able to get rid of players already on lucrative contracts having a knock on effect when it comes to trying to bring other players in. For example to bring a player(s) on this amount we would first need to shift a player(s) on that amount, ensuring our squad still meets our wage budget.
Is it really that hard to understand.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View OldFella's Profile OldFella Flag London 02 Sep 17 4.04pm Send a Private Message to OldFella Add OldFella as a friend

Originally posted by rikz

What's so hard to understand that he was making the point about not being able to get rid of players already on lucrative contracts having a knock on effect when it comes to trying to bring other players in. For example to bring a player(s) on this amount we would first need to shift a player(s) on that amount, ensuring our squad still meets our wage budget.
Is it really that hard to understand.

I think you may be the one who needs sub titles for the hard of understanding. ME's post is very clear if you take the trouble to read it properly.

 


Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it..

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 02 Sep 17 4.09pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

deleted as oldfella put it better than I could

Edited by Midlands Eagle (02 Sep 2017 4.09pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View grumpymort's Profile grumpymort Flag US/Thailand/UK 02 Sep 17 4.09pm Send a Private Message to grumpymort Add grumpymort as a friend

Originally posted by rikz

What's so hard to understand that he was making the point about not being able to get rid of players already on lucrative contracts having a knock on effect when it comes to trying to bring other players in. For example to bring a player(s) on this amount we would first need to shift a player(s) on that amount, ensuring our squad still meets our wage budget.
Is it really that hard to understand.


You release them just pay off the rest of contract that would free up a spot and wages or if the players wages are too high for other clubs interested you cut deal to pay part of the wage.

Parish inexperience is what is hindering the club he should just be owner and let others who know what they are doing run the club the guys too hands on

 


(VPN) - [Link]
(Alt VPN) - [Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View majorkaios's Profile majorkaios Flag Trowbridge, Wilts 02 Sep 17 4.42pm Send a Private Message to majorkaios Add majorkaios as a friend

Originally posted by adrian b

I find it hard to believe anybody who is Palace can accept our club will be forever scrambling for a few safety points every year, spending vast amounts on short term replacements and just be happy and relieved to maintain this position, season after season.
The Palace way is to play honestly with honest players and develop our own.
Parrish has shown a tendency to the first trait but now wants to make the change to a sustainable EPL outfit. Whoes with him?
I am, that's for sure. It will initially be a struggle, but we have the right men in the right places and a setup to match. Who on earth thought this would be instant and easy?

Edited by adrian b (02 Sep 2017 8.08am)


Nice Post

Count me in, The Palace Rollercoasters are the BEST !

 


School, SN.Juniors, SN High, Selhurst. 1st match 1972 CP 2 N. Utd 1. Thank you, John Jackson and Vince Hilair for brightening our darkest days. I moved to the west country in 1983. Always Proud and 'Glad All Over' to be a Palace Fan. ))

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 20 of 23 < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Lost our identity, thanks to parish