You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Paradise papers
April 30 2024 1.58am

Paradise papers

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 8 of 14 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

 

View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Nov 17 1.01pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

Well in that case I would suggest that if that someone's built up life dissolved because they now had to take home only 8k a month rather than 9k - your making my heart bleed here - then they had already pushed themselves too dangerously close to the edge financially.

Propensity to spend falls as income rises and propensity to save, by whatever means, rises.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Nov 17 1.15pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550


Of course they can...Apple have done just that moving a lot of their business from Ireland to Jersey

Amazon need fulfilment centres and van distribution centres dotted around the mainland to keep it delivering next day or same day. They could move 'upstairs' off the mainland and I'd guess employees would follow, but then future applicants are likely to be from that country or island.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lyons550's Profile Lyons550 Flag Shirley 07 Nov 17 1.30pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Amazon need fulfilment centres and van distribution centres dotted around the mainland to keep it delivering next day or same day. They could move 'upstairs' off the mainland and I'd guess employees would follow, but then future applicants are likely to be from that country or island.


EXACTLY why it needs a concerted effort...and not just one or two...(see earlier post)

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Nov 17 1.35pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550


EXACTLY why it needs a concerted effort...and not just one or two...(see earlier post)

I know but they still need to employ, operate, buy equipment, installation staff etc here.

What's stopping Britain introducing rates on on the centres businesses have to use when their accounting is held off shore?

The OECD will probably take ages.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 07 Nov 17 1.46pm

When tax rates are lower, more money is actually collected than when the rates are higher. This is because companies and individuals do not want the inconvenience and costs of complex schemes to avoid tax. Also they are prepared to work harder in the first place to earn more money when they get to keep more of it. Tax them too much and companies and individuals have no incentive to work and tax revenues drop.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 07 Nov 17 1.53pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

When tax rates are lower, more money is actually collected than when the rates are higher. This is because companies and individuals do not want the inconvenience and costs of complex schemes to avoid tax. Also they are prepared to work harder in the first place to earn more money when they get to keep more of it. Tax them too much and companies and individuals have no incentive to work and tax revenues drop.

How does that work? Are you saying rich people like Hamilton would say 'no' to their legal loophole expert accountants ideas if their tax was lowered to say 20% even though they could still avoid more doing it their man's way?

He already lives in Monaco so pays very little tax already yet his companies are still jumping all over avoidance schemes.

Greedy wealthy people aren't going to change just because their tax is lowered. If they can get get back VAT and suchlike they will even if their tax was 10%.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Nov 17 1.57pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

How does that work? Are you saying rich people like Hamilton would say 'no' to their legal loophole expert accountants ideas if their tax was lowered to say 20% even though they could still avoid more doing it their man's way?

He already lives in Monaco so pays very little tax already yet his companies are still jumping all over avoidance schemes.

Greedy wealthy people aren't going to change just because their tax is lowered. If they can get get back VAT and suchlike they will even if their tax was 10%.

It's a proven stat in the U.K. I expect a lot of people take their earnings now instead of keeping it in the business or shares and equity for future payments.

Have to laugh though at people who think business rates should keep coming down towards Ireland levels when we're currently much lower than most of Europe.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Nov 17 1.59pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

I remember hearing an eu law that West Ham could've broken with unfair advantage over their Olympic stadium agreement. I expect Amazon escape this being based in Luxembourg.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 07 Nov 17 2.04pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

When tax rates are lower, more money is actually collected than when the rates are higher. This is because companies and individuals do not want the inconvenience and costs of complex schemes to avoid tax. Also they are prepared to work harder in the first place to earn more money when they get to keep more of it. Tax them too much and companies and individuals have no incentive to work and tax revenues drop.

They are in the very fortunate position of having wealth by work or not depends who or what it is.

So they have a unique position, unlike the vast majority of us, of being able to contribute more to the society that made them wealthy.

It is actually their reward to be able to contribute more.

They should be happy!!!!!!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 07 Nov 17 2.04pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

How does that work? Are you saying rich people like Hamilton would say 'no' to their legal loophole expert accountants ideas if their tax was lowered to say 20% even though they could still avoid more doing it their man's way?

He already lives in Monaco so pays very little tax already yet his companies are still jumping all over avoidance schemes.

Greedy wealthy people aren't going to change just because their tax is lowered. If they can get get back VAT and suchlike they will even if their tax was 10%.

More corporation tax is being collected since they lowered the rates. Also, remember the Rolling Stones in the 70s going to live in France when Labour had a higher rate tax band of over 80% (98% in some cases) in order to fund their socialist utopia (whatever happened to that?). By the way, once you have taken all the money from those who have it and given it to those who do not and they have spent it, then what do you do?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 07 Nov 17 2.06pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

More corporation tax is being collected since they lowered the rates. Also, remember the Rolling Stones in the 70s going to live in France when Labour had a higher rate tax band of over 80% (98% in some cases) in order to fund their socialist utopia (whatever happened to that?). By the way, once you have taken all the money from those who have it and given it to those who do not and they have spent it, then what do you do?

And The Beatles in America? Bono? Any more?

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 07 Nov 17 2.08pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

They are in the very fortunate position of having wealth by work or not depends who or what it is.

So they have a unique position, unlike the vast majority of us, of being able to contribute more to the society that made them wealthy.

It is actually their reward to be able to contribute more.

They should be happy!!!!!!!

Sing the Internationale while being plundered you mean - like the victims of the Moscow show trials saying how much they deserved to be shot.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 8 of 14 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Paradise papers