You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Niasse Dive
December 12 2017 9.59pm

Niasse Dive

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 24 1 2 3 4 5 > Last Ľ

Palace Talk is sponsored by

The Sportsman - Perfect 10

Sponsor a forum or Advertise on the HOL!

 

View Harry Beever's Profile Harry Beever Flag Newbury 18 Nov 17 8.58pm Send a Private Message to Harry Beever Add Harry Beever as a friend

Havenít seen the game but a lot of people are writing online that they expect him to receive a ban once footage has been reviewed under the new guidelines. If this is the case it is recognition that he cheated and as such the goal should be taken away from Everton and the result should stand at 2-1. Thereís no way that if retrospective evidence reveals that a player has cheated as decided by a panel of experts that they should gain a point. Players need to know that they will gain their team no advantage. I would want our players treated the same way.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Goldfiinger's Profile Goldfiinger Flag Just down the road 18 Nov 17 9.03pm Send a Private Message to Goldfiinger Add Goldfiinger as a friend

Couple of things first your spot on but no chance in hell they'll change the result. Sorry but pipe dreams even considering it.

Second I'm not a 100% sure retrospective action can be taken even to give him a ban as the ref made a decision so it's not retrospective about an incident which wasn't seen.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dangermouse's Profile Dangermouse Flag Hastings 18 Nov 17 9.13pm Send a Private Message to Dangermouse Add Dangermouse as a friend

All three have to agree it's a dive for any action to be taken. They've bottled every decision so far, so because there was contact with his shoulder they will bottle it again. It's a contact sport and body contact in most cases should be ignored because of that reason, but I guanantee they will bottle it, "Cos there was contact." I'd love to be proved wrong and they send out a message, but I won't hold my breath.

Edited by Dangermouse (18 Nov 2017 10.17pm)

 


That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!

R.I.P. staffie

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View MrCParrot's Profile MrCParrot Flag Taunton 18 Nov 17 9.17pm Send a Private Message to MrCParrot Add MrCParrot as a friend

Originally posted by Dangermouse

All three me have to agree it's a dive for any action to be taken. They've bottled every decision so far, so because there was contact with his shoulder they will bottle it again. It's a contact sport and body contact in most cases should be ignored because of that reason, but I guanantee they will bottle it, "Cos there was contact." I'd love to be proved wrong and they send out a message, but I won't hold my breath.

Sadly I feel you are correct.
They're probably waiting for Wilf so I can throw the book at him

I truly despise the FA and FIFA BTW

Parrot

 


Mr Cadbury's Parrot says "Hello"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View chateauferret's Profile chateauferret Online Flag Airdrie 18 Nov 17 9.30pm Send a Private Message to chateauferret Add chateauferret as a friend

Originally posted by MrCParrot

Sadly I feel you are correct.
They're probably waiting for Wilf so I can throw the book at him

I truly despise the FA and FIFA BTW

Parrot

Except if it were Wilf it would be yellow card and no penalty because it's Wilf. So it won't get in front of the panel.

If the correct decision had been given it would not only have been no goal but Niasse would have had a yellow card, so would either have had to change his conduct later on or else have been sent off sometime before half-time. It would also have sent a signal to Everton that the referee wasn't having any s***.

Unfortunately the referee was indeed having s***, and plenty of it. He let them get away with murder.

The panel will make no difference to anything until the consequences it imposes are severe enough to make cheating not worth while. That means losing all advantage gained from the cheating with an additional penalty for cheating itself. People like Niasse and Snodgrass need to be told that they are playing in a country where a batsman who has hit the ball and is then caught walks from the wicket before the umpire has had to decide whether to raise his finger or not, and that similar sportsmanship is expected of them or else.

And referees need to be told that if they perform like that idiot did this afternoon they can collect their P45s.

As pointed out above, however, those things won't happen until the pig farm starts operating international flights.

 


==========
The Ferret
==========

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rachid Rachid Rachid's Profile Rachid Rachid Rachid Flag 18 Nov 17 9.32pm Send a Private Message to Rachid Rachid Rachid Add Rachid Rachid Rachid as a friend

Anyone get a view of Wilf's appeal in the corner first half ? He looked like he went a few feet in the air.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Casual's Profile Casual Flag Orpington 18 Nov 17 9.52pm Send a Private Message to Casual Add Casual as a friend

At the game I thought it was a penalty (well Iíd have been shouting for one if it was up the other end ) might be wrong. Looked like a body check , no need to give him the option to dive , if heís going no where.
Like Delaney against Benteke (for Liverpool) if you pull out of the challenge thereís no opportunity to dive.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View MikeCrete's Profile MikeCrete Flag Cheam/Crete 18 Nov 17 10.13pm Send a Private Message to MikeCrete Add MikeCrete as a friend

Donít know how to copy my post of Ref: Palace v Everton to hear.
Sue the diver, Ref & FA.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dangermouse's Profile Dangermouse Flag Hastings 18 Nov 17 10.23pm Send a Private Message to Dangermouse Add Dangermouse as a friend

Originally posted by Casual

At the game I thought it was a penalty (well Iíd have been shouting for one if it was up the other end ) might be wrong. Looked like a body check , no need to give him the option to dive , if he’s going no where.
Like Delaney against Benteke (for Liverpool) if you pull out of the challenge thereís no opportunity to dive.

Sorry, but Dann has to move to cover the run. As he closes in he sees the danger of fouling him and pulls out. His hand touches the shoulder of Niasse, but it's a contact sport and body contact doesn't make your legs fold up behind you and send you to the floor. If Dann had just let him run through I can only imagine the s*** he'd be getting now.
The referee had the perfect view of the incident and the fact he gave it means that Asian betting syndicates could be a real problem in football, cos I can't see any other reason for the prick to give it.

 


That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!

R.I.P. staffie

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PZ Eagle's Profile PZ Eagle Online Flag Penzance 18 Nov 17 10.35pm Send a Private Message to PZ Eagle Add PZ Eagle as a friend

The ref lives near Liverpool so he doesnt want to go shopping and get grief from Everton fans about not giving a penalty or giving Palace one.

Its about time we had truly neutral refs who don't live anywhere near either team. We got kicked to death against Huddersfield and the ref Moss lives close.
We are getting shafted by the FA when it comes to ref appointments.

 


Conjunctivitis.com - A site for sore eyes.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 18 Nov 17 11.54pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

At the game I thought it was shoulder to shoulder and goes down with it happening to see what he can get. Now I know it's blatant cheating because Dann pulls out, there's minimal contact and the weasel goes down.

Contact or minimal ontactbor being impeded should apply when it affects the attackers run or control of the ball, passing or shooting opportunity. Dann just being there caused none of that.

Fvcking disgrace. I'm of the view that you give what you see. If you don't see something, don't give it. He clearly didn't see anything so he's fvcked up, but because the fa suits have never kicked a football it means sh1t.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View slubglurge's Profile slubglurge Flag welling 19 Nov 17 5.49pm Send a Private Message to slubglurge Add slubglurge as a friend

I wonder if Niasse was playing for Hull when Snodgrass did his dying swan act and noticed how easy it is to con a ref when Dann is involved.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 24 1 2 3 4 5 > Last Ľ

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Niasse Dive