You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread
March 30 2023 9.02am

Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 429 of 441 < 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 >

 

View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Mar 23 5.31pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That's a demand for a confirmatory referendum, not direct action!

Something I disagreed with. I wanted Parliament itself to act, toss out Johnson, install an interim pm, and do what they truly believed was in our best interests. In the end Corbyn stopped that from happening. If he had stood aside I doubt we would now be in the mess that Brexit has caused.

Stood aside for Starmer. He's made all the difference.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 15 Mar 23 8.56pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

its another Rape epidemic.....

[Link]

 


inár n-aonar i Anerley, uimhir a haon londain theas

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Mar 23 11.40pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Stood aside for Starmer. He's made all the difference.

He didn't. Starmer was chosen after Corbyn resigned following Labour's disastrous 2019 election campaign. I have nothing but disdain for Corbyn. Starmer doesn't excite, me but at least he seems to have a modicum of integrity.

The standing down by Corbyn ought to have happened in the Autumn of 2019, but he thought he could win, is anti-EU himself, and refused. Personal ambition replaced duty. A new leader could have changed Labour's confused position on Brexit, backed a confirmatory referendum, joined with the SNP, Lib Dems and pro-EU Tories to defeat Johnson in a vote of no-confidence. Then we would have had an interim PM, and a short-term national government and the referendum. Once done we would have had a GE.

Corbyn is as much to blame for Brexit as Johnson.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Mar 23 11.51pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

He didn't. Starmer was chosen after Corbyn resigned following Labour's disastrous 2019 election campaign. I have nothing but disdain for Corbyn. Starmer doesn't excite, me but at least he seems to have a modicum of integrity.

The standing down by Corbyn ought to have happened in the Autumn of 2019, but he thought he could win, is anti-EU himself, and refused. Personal ambition replaced duty. A new leader could have changed Labour's confused position on Brexit, backed a confirmatory referendum, joined with the SNP, Lib Dems and pro-EU Tories to defeat Johnson in a vote of no-confidence. Then we would have had an interim PM, and a short-term national government and the referendum. Once done we would have had a GE.

Corbyn is as much to blame for Brexit as Johnson.

So who was Corbyn supposed to have stepped aside for?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 15 Mar 23 11.57pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by Nicholas91

You've missed the point completely there but no surprise.

yup. Correct mate.

i am asking myself the question : is Wisbech (& Teddy) deliberately trolling the thread with irrelevant shyte ?

Edited by PalazioVecchio (16 Mar 2023 12.04am)

 


inár n-aonar i Anerley, uimhir a haon londain theas

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 16 Mar 23 12.06am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

yup. Correct mate.

i am asking myself the question : is Wisbech (& Teddy) deliberately trolling the thread with irrelevant shyte ?

Edited by PalazioVecchio (16 Mar 2023 12.04am)

If I was then I apologise.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 16 Mar 23 12.19am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

If I was then I apologise.

good man. Apology accepted. Now....grooming gangs. They haven't gone away.

 


inár n-aonar i Anerley, uimhir a haon londain theas

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Mar 23 8.11am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

So who was Corbyn supposed to have stepped aside for?

He didn't step aside for anyone. He stood down, so the party could choose a new leader. Probably jumping before he was pushed.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Mar 23 8.15am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

good man. Apology accepted. Now....grooming gangs. They haven't gone away.

Threads get diverted. It happens.

Now grooming gangs AND Laxley-Lennon.

This thread is supposed to be about his role in the whole sorry affair. Something that the case in Barrow has shone some light on.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View georgenorman's Profile georgenorman Flag 16 Mar 23 9.18am Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

He didn't. Starmer was chosen after Corbyn resigned following Labour's disastrous 2019 election campaign. I have nothing but disdain for Corbyn. Starmer doesn't excite, me but at least he seems to have a modicum of integrity.

The standing down by Corbyn ought to have happened in the Autumn of 2019, but he thought he could win, is anti-EU himself, and refused. Personal ambition replaced duty. A new leader could have changed Labour's confused position on Brexit, backed a confirmatory referendum, joined with the SNP, Lib Dems and pro-EU Tories to defeat Johnson in a vote of no-confidence. Then we would have had an interim PM, and a short-term national government and the referendum. Once done we would have had a GE.

Corbyn is as much to blame for Brexit as Johnson.

You might as well have gone straight to a military coup.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Pembroke's Profile Pembroke Flag Bristol 16 Mar 23 9.54am Send a Private Message to Pembroke Add Pembroke as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Threads get diverted. It happens.

Now grooming gangs AND Laxley-Lennon.

This thread is supposed to be about his role in the whole sorry affair. Something that the case in Barrow has shone some light on.

What does the case in Barrow shine a light on?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 16 Mar 23 3.46pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Pembroke

What does the case in Barrow shine a light on?

I was at an FA cup game at Barrow once. They all had miners' helmets with lights. A little intimidating with several thousand of them. At least the thread isn't getting diverted.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 429 of 441 < 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread