In the petition it says “and a Palace have yet to win at home”

Suggesting the lack of wins is due to the absence of HF?

Trivial fact - Palace used to win 5-1 at least once a season, maybe next season?

Or because Parish and the club did nothing but create this situation, which could’ve been avoided if they released the proposals supplied by the HF. Maybe if the club gave it a try they might’ve stayed put in B if the club tried, but they fecked it up instead. Going by the response to the HF statements, proposals and brochure it stood a bell of a better chance than how the club handled it, which was an amateurish joke as per usual.

COYP

Oh dear, oh dear.

a) they are a financial irrelevance, as proved by the original poster is of course true, and not 'actual bollox if you look at it from a real business angle' whatever that is meant to mean.

Seeing as you obviously bunked off most of your GCSE Businees Studies, let me help you, from a real business angle (sic)

What Parish, or mostly likely, the Marketing Director has done is used the HF to help build the CPFC brand.

Now since RMH first attributed a monetary value to their brand on their spreadsheets, a brand can be considerably more valuable than its generic commodity counterpart, but alas, a brand asset i.e. the HF, have no intrinsic financial value to them whatsoever (their value is purely emotional, which of course is not to say, without worth, but I'm digressing from the point

Oh course Parish, or the Marketing Director, was a bit of t*** to attribute their brand to an asset they neither own nor control but they look a positive genius compared to the comments you're leaving here

And you're also on very dodgy grounds if you persist with a financial equation for fans, - purely from looking at it from a real business angle, the fans who are worth more to any club, Palace included , are of course the Corporate ones.

There's a few points being missed/ignored though:

1) At the time, the Club was working flat out to get planning for the new stand & this would clearly have an impact on any proposed move around.

2) We weren't exactly safe from relegation which could also have affected the situation.

3) The proposal, in the form it's been released now, could have been made public by the HF to either allay fears or simply clarify all the arguing going on across social media.

It seems to me that the HF & the Club both want the same thing but one wants it immediately & the other sees the problems/bigger picture of such an undertaking.

Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five!

well after the match for me as i had a trek through west ham chelsea spurs oh and millwall fun days still supported the team

I disagree.... If I was one of their supporters

I definitely would not want the HF back

and wouldn't sign