You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Woman arrested for calling out ‘shame on you’
October 21 2019 5.00pm

Woman arrested for calling out ‘shame on you’

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag Wisbech, England 30 Jul 19 12.08am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

There will always be bad taste remarks and jokes.

I was shocked by the building going up and whoever sent it up is a brick.....but some people just don't care, or want to be an arse in private...or they are autistic over empathy or whatever excuse it is.

Anyway, as long as you aren't forced to listen or read it....it's what facepalms are meant for.....not prisons.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dollardays's Profile dollardays Flag 30 Jul 19 12.33am Send a Private Message to dollardays Add dollardays as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

while i agree with you, history is awash with those who mocked and got away with it.

ever heard of the General Belgrano ?

Well certainly. They 'should' be free to joke about what they will, just as people should be free to draw their own conclusions about what they make of that. Recording it didn't help. If you're going to mock people burning to death it helps if you're not potentially broadcasting it to millions of people. It's not a great introduction.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 30 Jul 19 12.50am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

Well certainly. They 'should' be free to joke about what they will, just as people should be free to draw their own conclusions about what they make of that. Recording it didn't help. If you're going to mock people burning to death it helps if you're not potentially broadcasting it to millions of people. It's not a great introduction.

do tv journalists love a good 'live disaster' to broadcast to all their hungry viewers ?

but somehow i doubt the BBC will be offering a pundit job to that lady in the burka

 


from the Etihad, Emirates, Molyneux, London Stadium & Anfield to Old Trafford.....Raptors on the Road

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Harry Beever's Profile Harry Beever Flag Newbury 30 Jul 19 6.26am Send a Private Message to Harry Beever Add Harry Beever as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

That was a stark example. I have two thoughts.

1 - Under no circumstance should he go to jail

2 - It's really, really s***ty to laugh at and mock people who burned to death in a fire.

So, I think due to 2, whatever penalty he paid should've been a social cost based on how others may have perceived it, rather than a legal or criminal one.

Edited by dollardays (29 Jul 2019 11.30pm)

I think he should have been made to visit the site and made to meet people who lost loved ones and filmed doing it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag Chatham 30 Jul 19 6.40am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Harry Beever

I think he should have been made to visit the site and made to meet people who lost loved ones and filmed doing it.

Most TV channels showed it burning 'live'.
Should we all feel guilty for not turning off.
He only shared it on a private chat.
Some t*** then passed it to some t***.
Fine him, move on.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 30 Jul 19 7.18am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

There will always be bad taste remarks and jokes.

I thought that the letterbox's comment that "God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve” was quite amusing

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyboy1978's Profile dannyboy1978 Flag 30 Jul 19 7.28am Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Originally posted by Harry Beever

I think he should have been made to visit the site and made to meet people who lost loved ones and filmed doing it.

Rubbish, it's like going on a speed awareness course for doing 33 in a 30. Waste of time.
The only crime was it being made public. Otherwise do Anything you want in private that doesn't effect anyone else that's legal.
Did the Steven Lawrence murderers get nicked for that under cover video? No.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Online Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 30 Jul 19 11.10am Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

while i agree with you, history is awash with those who mocked and got away with it.

ever heard of the General Belgrano ?

I'd sink it again in a heartbeat.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Penge Eagle's Profile Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 30 Jul 19 11.22am Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

The LGBTQ v Islam intersectionality battle is fascinating. The left just cannot work out which minority group to go for. As you can see by the current Oppression League table (which the BBC swears by), it's neck and neck on goal difference!

1. Transgenders
2. LGBTQ
3. Muslims
4. Indian subcontinent
5. Disabled
6. Non-white women
7. White women
8. Black men
9. East Asians
10. White men
11. Working class
12. Evangelical Christians
13. Jews

Vegans' application to the league is currently in review.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Online Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 30 Jul 19 11.31am Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

The LGBTQ v Islam intersectionality battle is fascinating. The left just cannot work out which minority group to go for. As you can see by the current Oppression League table (which the BBC swears by), it's neck and neck on goal difference!

1. Transgenders
2. LGBTQ
3. Muslims
4. Indian subcontinent
5. Disabled
6. Non-white women
7. White women
8. Black men
9. East Asians
10. White men
11. Working class
12. Evangelical Christians
13. Jews

Vegans' application to the league is currently in review.

White men and the working class have withdrawn their entries from the current league. White men are the oppressors/ potential rapists/ sex offenders. And there is no class in this classless society.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag Wisbech, England 30 Jul 19 11.34am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I thought that the letterbox's comment that "God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve” was quite amusing

Genetically I view sexuality like eyesight.

20/20 as the ideal just as heterosexuality is the ideal. People will have differing strengths of eyesight just as they will heterosexuality....especially females.

No one gets a say in whether they are born with 20/20 or not, same as sexuality. However, there is no equality between good and not so good eyesight.

The species is meant to reproduce.....encouraging less reproduction, and creating more competition between heterosexual males for fewer females is not holistically sensible policy.

Especially not for Europeans....who are only 1 in 10 of the world population.

I've just realised I've written a serious answer to an amusing comment.....ah well.

Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Jul 2019 12.16pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Penge Eagle's Profile Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 30 Jul 19 11.50am Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

How long before gangs commit criminal/terrorist offences wearing the burka because they cannot be identified? They'd know the government is s*** scared to ban it for fear of 'Islamaphobia', yet why is it that Islamic countries such as Tunisia, Chad and Morocco do ban full/partial covering?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Woman arrested for calling out ‘shame on you’