You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Topic
August 7 2020 1.35pm

Nathan Ferguson (Signed) (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 30 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

This forum is sponsored by

Football Index

Sponsor a forum or Advertise on the HOL!

Topic Locked

View Phil’s Barber's Profile Phil’s Barber Flag Crowborough 09 Jan 20 9.01pm Send a Private Message to Phil’s Barber Add Phil’s Barber as a friend

Originally posted by mattteo

I also remembered that Nathan Ferguson was a youngster playing as center back for West Brom. Not sure why you wouldn't believe him.

Seriously?!

You really need me to answer that?! :roflmao:

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View chris123's Profile chris123 Flag hove actually 09 Jan 20 9.01pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by Phil’s Barber


Yep...and so can I.

It would be a quiet place otherwise!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View samprior's Profile samprior Flag Hamburg 09 Jan 20 9.42pm Send a Private Message to samprior Add samprior as a friend

If we can then 100% we should get him. Real talent. Learning his trade at full back but tipped by many to wind up as a centre half. All those positions are needed by us - some slightly more urgently than others.

I'd give up on mispending money on a striker and leave that until the summer. For now I'd get Ferguson, Bogle and KWP. And no I don't think that'd be an overload as they're all capable of playing in more than one position.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 10 Jan 20 6.19am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Phil’s Barber


Yep...and so can I.

That doesn't include sniping at other forum members though so please stop it

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 10 Jan 20 11.52am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

I really am not going to respond in detail to some of the vitriol aimed at me on here.

At the end of the day I posted about Ferguson in good faith based on my knowledge of the player and was not seeking to create an impression of any grandiloquence or to place myself on any pedestal.

I don't believe that criticisms of individuals adds value to the thread so in the interests of HOL the debate should focus on the player which I did and will continue to do if I have anything meaningful to add.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Hudsoneagle's Profile Hudsoneagle Flag 10 Jan 20 12.17pm Send a Private Message to Hudsoneagle Add Hudsoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by mattteo

This "cover for 3 ppsitions" is really overrated. I hardly ever saw players who are very good on multiple positions. One of them is James Milner.

Others just "are sent in" in those positions, doesn't mean they are any good.

Players shpuld be best at 1 ppsition- the one they play in. That's why there's a starter and a backup for every position. If somehow in a season, both of those are unavailable, then someone fills in.

Nathan has 12 matches as right back and some as left back. Not enough to be considered good in 3 positions.

Sun Jihai was good in 8 positions...come on Matteo, you play Football Manager you should know of him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Hudsoneagle's Profile Hudsoneagle Flag 10 Jan 20 12.22pm Send a Private Message to Hudsoneagle Add Hudsoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

I really am not going to respond in detail to some of the vitriol aimed at me on here.

At the end of the day I posted about Ferguson in good faith based on my knowledge of the player and was not seeking to create an impression of any grandiloquence or to place myself on any pedestal.

I don't believe that criticisms of individuals adds value to the thread so in the interests of HOL the debate should focus on the player which I did and will continue to do if I have anything meaningful to add.

To be brutally honest Willo...you invite it on yourself. You are quite transparent.

I have no problem with it...but can understand why others get tired of it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 10 Jan 20 12.42pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

To be brutally honest Willo...you invite it on yourself. You are quite transparent.

I have no problem with it...but can understand why others get tired of it.

All I try to do is to provide some relevant information which I believe might be useful.
My motivation is not to project myself as some omniscient sage in bouts of self-promotion.

Edited by Willo (10 Jan 2020 1.15pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 10 Jan 20 1.24pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

come on Matteo, you play Football Manager you should know of him.


Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

To be brutally honest Willo...you invite it on yourself. You are quite transparent.

You have posted twice in this thread and both have been digs at other forum members.

If you don't wish to contribute positively please don't post at all and the same goes for anyone else who would rather have a sly dig at others rather than contribute positively


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Hudsoneagle's Profile Hudsoneagle Flag 10 Jan 20 1.41pm Send a Private Message to Hudsoneagle Add Hudsoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

You have posted twice in this thread and both have been digs at other forum members.

If you don't wish to contribute positively please don't post at all and the same goes for anyone else who would rather have a sly dig at others rather than contribute positively


You are as accurate with stats as Matteo I see.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Eustace H. Plimsoll's Profile Eustace H. Plimsoll Flag Aldershot 10 Jan 20 6.43pm Send a Private Message to Eustace H. Plimsoll Add Eustace H. Plimsoll as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

You have posted twice in this thread and both have been digs at other forum members.

If you don't wish to contribute positively please don't post at all and the same goes for anyone else who would rather have a sly dig at others rather than contribute positively


Is there any chance of a bit of public clarity on this please? Only because it seems a rule horribly inconsistently applied and I would absolutely hate to see anyone fall foul of it through no fault of their own.

The 'offending' poster could scarcely be claimed to be a contributor who posts exclusively negatively. I've seen even you have digs - sly and otherwise - at others on various other threads on more than one occasion, without any self-rebuke. (I don't have a problem whatsoever with this, as it happens - it's sometimes been deserved, as far as I can see - as I see no reason why moderators should be disallowed the chance to air their views.)

I've also seen numerous digs not related to you go unmoderated (I'm sure you're entirely unaware of these.)

It therefore rather sticks in the craw to see moderators slate certain posters and opinions only then for them to get very sensitive and disapproving when other posters cop for a bit of flak (much of it similarly well-deserved, it seems to me).

I dare say I am missing the point somewhat and am a dreadful upstart and dangerous dissident, nonetheless it all seems to the uninitiated to have the whiff of one-eyed inconsistency and favouritism.

 


As a woman, I can step aside, or step up my game...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Phil’s Barber's Profile Phil’s Barber Flag Crowborough 10 Jan 20 6.50pm Send a Private Message to Phil’s Barber Add Phil’s Barber as a friend

Originally posted by Eustace H. Plimsoll

Is there any chance of a bit of public clarity on this please? Only because it seems a rule horribly inconsistently applied and I would absolutely hate to see anyone fall foul of it through no fault of their own.

The 'offending' poster could scarcely be claimed to be a contributor who posts exclusively negatively. I've seen even you have digs - sly and otherwise - at others on various other threads on more than one occasion, without any self-rebuke. (I don't have a problem whatsoever with this, as it happens - it's sometimes been deserved, as far as I can see - as I see no reason why moderators should be disallowed the chance to air their views.)

I've also seen numerous digs not related to you go unmoderated (I'm sure you're entirely unaware of these.)

It therefore rather sticks in the craw to see moderators slate certain posters and opinions only then for them to get very sensitive and disapproving when other posters cop for a bit of flak (much of it similarly well-deserved, it seems to me).

I dare say I am missing the point somewhat and am a dreadful upstart and dangerous dissident, nonetheless it all seems to the uninitiated to have the whiff of one-eyed inconsistency and favouritism.


Extremely well written and I wholeheartedly agree.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 3 of 30 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Topic