The Brexit party vote looks to be potentially doing a bit of a disappearing act of late, which you would expect. It'll be interesting to see if the same happens with the Lib Dems when push comes to shove.

Whilst I will ignore the other responses for being at the predictable and under moderated level I have come to expect here I think I ought to respond to yours.

Actually you don't fall into "that" category!

I disagree with your politics but you are respectful and polite.

There are others on here who back in the 1930s would have been wearing black shirts and marching with Oswald Mosley. It's those who I cannot tolerate and who I think all decent people, including yourself, ought to oppose vehemently. The problem is that they don't recognise this in themselves.

I won't name names, as they ought to be obvious.

Add to that the standard of "moderation" which is so biased as to be a joke and you might begin to understand why a moderate like me thinks there are better ways at the moment to spend my time than on here.

I too will be out on the doorsteps soon. But not for the Tory Party. They have left me.

If this really is "the brexit election" and it is the main factor in how people vote, it will be interesting to see how close the end result is to how constituencies voted in the referendum.
Leave 406
Remain 242.

The scandal over Boris Johnson’s friendship with technology entrepreneur Jennifer Arcuri was reignited on Saturday after the Observer revealed that the independent police watchdog has delayed its announcement on whether the PM should face an investigation into possible criminal misconduct until after the election.

The decision prompted fury from Westminster politicians and London assembly members who said it appeared that a ruling had been “suppressed” in order to protect Johnson from potentially damaging headlines at a crucial stage of the election campaign.

I didn't attach much to this until I thought, hang on, what has the political situation got to do with the police?