You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
April 30 2024 9.00am

Coronavirus (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 376 of 1255 < 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 >

Topic Locked

BlueJay Flag UK 16 May 20 7.51pm

Originally posted by BlueJay

Macaque monkey trial offers hope [Link]

Early days but potentially promising

Preliminary results from this vaccine in humans should be available sometime in June. Rhesus macaque monkeys share about 93% of the same DNA as humans, so they're a logical step prior to testing in humans.

Edited by BlueJay (16 May 2020 11.34pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
BlueJay Flag UK 16 May 20 7.57pm

They've intentionally quoted an incomplete version of what he said he make their point though -

"The chance of anyone watching this dying of coronavirus is actually low" - is of course entirely wrong

"On an individual level, the chance of anyone watching this dying of coronavirus is actually low" - is of course correct

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Online Flag Truro Cornwall 16 May 20 9.26pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

If you really believe that us taking the precautions that we have is a "hysterical overreaction by psychopathic lockdown statists" then I really pity you!

It isn't. It's a very wise buying of time during which we learn, assess and prepare.

If blundering headlong into a dark space is your idea of the way to confront this crisis then, whilst Mr Trump might agree with you, I don't and nor, I suspect, do many others in the UK.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 16 May 20 9.51pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

If you really believe that us taking the precautions that we have is a "hysterical overreaction by psychopathic lockdown statists" then I really pity you!

It isn't. It's a very wise buying of time during which we learn, assess and prepare.

If blundering headlong into a dark space is your idea of the way to confront this crisis then, whilst Mr Trump might agree with you, I don't and nor, I suspect, do many others in the UK.

Pull your head out of your ass. I didn't suggest that, so please do not lump me in with the Trumpsters.
I am merely saying that although this is a serious illness & is highly contagious, very few people who contract it will actually die from the disease.
And for the record I trust what this expert is saying more than some of the convoluted bulls*** you spew.
As for Trump meh' point your Cannons at the likes of De Blasio & Andrew Cuomo Democrats who have completely f***ed up from day one including 1000s of deaths in nursing homes something you liberals are accusing Johnson & the Tory government are doing.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Online Flag Truro Cornwall 16 May 20 10.25pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

Pull your head out of your ass. I didn't suggest that, so please do not lump me in with the Trumpsters.
I am merely saying that although this is a serious illness & is highly contagious, very few people who contract it will actually die from the disease.
And for the record I trust what this expert is saying more than some of the convoluted bulls*** you spew.
As for Trump meh' point your Cannons at the likes of De Blasio & Andrew Cuomo Democrats who have completely f***ed up from day one including 1000s of deaths in nursing homes something you liberals are accusing Johnson & the Tory government are doing.

The fact that the overall percentage who will die is not going to be that high is largely down to the fact that we have contained the spread and managed the risk. If we had just let it run it's course I think the consequences would have been very different. I might be wrong, but the fact that we did what we did suggests that those taking the decisions decided that the risk was too high.

So that the death rate has been managed, so far at least, is not an argument for suggesting the lockdown was a mistake. Which is what these people are suggesting.

I am not as close to what has happened in NY as you but looked at from here it seems that the local politicians have done a responsible job whilst being given little help and encouragement from the President, who seems entirely consumed by making sure this crisis doesn't impact his reelection prospects and hang everything else.

Everywhere has suffered from a lack of preparedness and the availability of PPE and ventilators. You can only do the best you can with what you have and mistakes will be made and lessons learned. By the wise anyway.

You won't find anything from me attacking the government over the care home situation for exactly the same applies here. We can all look back in time to analyse and learn lessons. Right now is not the time for political point-scoring. It's a time for coordinated action.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Online Flag 16 May 20 10.45pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

[Link]

An interesting article questioning the next moves.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 16 May 20 10.53pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

The fact that the overall percentage who will die is not going to be that high is largely down to the fact that we have contained the spread and managed the risk. If we had just let it run it's course I think the consequences would have been very different. I might be wrong, but the fact that we did what we did suggests that those taking the decisions decided that the risk was too high.

So that the death rate has been managed, so far at least, is not an argument for suggesting the lockdown was a mistake. Which is what these people are suggesting.

I am not as close to what has happened in NY as you but looked at from here it seems that the local politicians have done a responsible job whilst being given little help and encouragement from the President, who seems entirely consumed by making sure this crisis doesn't impact his reelection prospects and hang everything else.

Everywhere has suffered from a lack of preparedness and the availability of PPE and ventilators. You can only do the best you can with what you have and mistakes will be made and lessons learned. By the wise anyway.

You won't find anything from me attacking the government over the care home situation for exactly the same applies here. We can all look back in time to analyse and learn lessons. Right now is not the time for political point-scoring. It's a time for coordinated action.

EXACTLY you are not close to know what's going on, but still managed to have a dig at Trump in virtually the same sentence.
De Blasio has been an absolute disaster he is from the same left leaning pissing out of the window school of thought as London's Sadiq Khan.
In fairness Cuomo has been marginally better but not by much.
As for Trump NYS asked for Ventilators (they got them) a Hospital ship (they got it) & all supplied by the Federal Government. For the record the ship was barely used, nor the Javits Center or indeed most of the ventilators although Cuomo claimed they needed 30,000.
He then took credit for shipping them out too other states.
Sounds kinda like the sort of thing Trump would do?

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 16 May 20 10.54pm

A good friend of mine is a counsellor at a grammar school and has a private practice at home. He also happens to look after his elderly Mother. He was telling me that he may have to give up both jobs, on account that he's likely to be unable to avoid covid-19 at work or due to people coming into the home, as this would endanger his Mother.

There are likely countless people in positions like this and it speaks to the need to have a far more targetted approach to protecting the elderly without putting the entire world indefinitely on hold in the process.

- Better processes for keeping covid-19 out of care homes - Frequent testing, not sending patients into homes from hospital until they test negative.

- A message that expresses the peril that businesses face if they cannot restart in some capacity, but also encourages sensible measures to avoid large outbreaks

- Measures to encourage elderly within the community to pair up and seek shelter together where possible so that they have social bubbles but are protected while better treatments are found or this works it's way through communities.

I can understand why the government issued a catch-all Stay at Home at the time to get people to adhere to it, but going forward it's important to focus on the facts and probabilities in a way that reflects reality and takes the finger off the pause button.


Edited by BlueJay (16 May 2020 10.57pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 16 May 20 11.52pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

A good friend of mine is a counsellor at a grammar school and has a private practice at home. He also happens to look after his elderly Mother. He was telling me that he may have to give up both jobs, on account that he's likely to be unable to avoid covid-19 at work or due to people coming into the home, as this would endanger his Mother.

There are likely countless people in positions like this and it speaks to the need to have a far more targetted approach to protecting the elderly without putting the entire world indefinitely on hold in the process.

- Better processes for keeping covid-19 out of care homes - Frequent testing, not sending patients into homes from hospital until they test negative.

- A message that expresses the peril that businesses face if they cannot restart in some capacity, but also encourages sensible measures to avoid large outbreaks

- Measures to encourage elderly within the community to pair up and seek shelter together where possible so that they have social bubbles but are protected while better treatments are found or this works it's way through communities.

I can understand why the government issued a catch-all Stay at Home at the time to get people to adhere to it, but going forward it's important to focus on the facts and probabilities in a way that reflects reality and takes the finger off the pause button.


Edited by BlueJay (16 May 2020 10.57pm)

People entering care homes from hospitals are automatically quarantined for 14 days.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Online Flag Truro Cornwall 17 May 20 12.13am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

EXACTLY you are not close to know what's going on, but still managed to have a dig at Trump in virtually the same sentence.
De Blasio has been an absolute disaster he is from the same left leaning pissing out of the window school of thought as London's Sadiq Khan.
In fairness Cuomo has been marginally better but not by much.
As for Trump NYS asked for Ventilators (they got them) a Hospital ship (they got it) & all supplied by the Federal Government. For the record the ship was barely used, nor the Javits Center or indeed most of the ventilators although Cuomo claimed they needed 30,000.
He then took credit for shipping them out too other states.
Sounds kinda like the sort of thing Trump would do?

You show your bias in the comments on Sadiq Khan. De Blasio has come over rather well in the presentations I have seen. Passionate, caring and committed. That he gave estimates that subsequently proved incorrect is a common phenomenon of this crisis. He would have not made them up but acted on the best advice available to him. Hindsight being what it is can make the really foolish seem wise, and the very clever seem foolish. We haven't needed the Nightingale Hospitals. Yet! But we have them now, ready for a second wave and so the NHS can resume some of it's currently paused work. I guess your Javits centre falls into the same category.

Yes, I dig at Trump because his performance during this crisis is a disgrace and it needs to be called out. Yes, he agreed to send the hospital ship, but made sure he was photographed as it left the dock so everyone would know. If he had refused to send it he would have been hung out to dry!

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (17 May 2020 12.15am)

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 17 May 20 12.56am

Originally posted by Mapletree

People entering care homes from hospitals are automatically quarantined for 14 days.

There have been numerous cases of old people put back into care homes resulting in wider outbreaks. In some cases tests have subsequently come back positive after you've been sent back. In others they have been sent to homes without current outbreaks, subsequently causing one.

I think I recall you saying you work in this environment. I'm certainly not making a personal criticism, instead saying that the measures put in place or suggested were not adequate. This is evident by fact that Covid-19 is present in 35% + of care homes. There's more covid-19 in these environments than almost anywhere, because realistically social distancing isn't present. Quarantining is worthwhile, but it clearly hasn't been particularly successful and asymptomatic staff likely bring it into the environment too.

There is no getting away from the fact that old people in these environments are sitting ducks, and the perfect storm for getting wiped out. If anyone has an elderly relative in a home, they should be aware of the considerable dangers and do their best for their loved ones based on that. In cases when they're well enough not to be there and there's other options, I would not blame them for choosing them.

I understand that in some homes in France they have a rota type system where staff remain in the building for an extended period of time. That would cut the risks. I can't see it happening here though, so increased testing is probably as good as it gets.

Edited by BlueJay (17 May 2020 12.57am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 17 May 20 1.02am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

They started quarantining elderly going into care homes a few weeks ago so not since the beginning of this virus. That’s where your complaint is. No doubt there is still some repairs to the procedures to follow.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (17 May 2020 1.02am)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 376 of 1255 < 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic