BBC (again)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Badger11  Beckenham 15 Mar 23 12.41pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The Morning Star GIFT ANNUAL £199.99 One year full subscription. I rushed straight back here as I know demand will be high.
Typical commies always ready to embrace capitalism when it suits them
One more point |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 15 Mar 23 1.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The Guardian. Left wing
The Times, neutral. Yes. Predominantly leftist. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Mar 2023 11.15am) The Sun supports the next election winner.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mstrobez 15 Mar 23 1.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The Guardian. Left wing
The Times, neutral. Yes. Predominantly leftist. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Mar 2023 11.15am) Well this is hardcore bollocks isn’t it. How can you separate the Guardian, Observer, Mirror & Sunday Mirror as separate entities just to make your first paragraph bigger, but then not list the Sunday Times, Mail on Sunday & Sunday Express in the second? Disingenuous beyond belief. And to suggest the Times isn’t on the right and insinuate the Sun is left wing is absolutely ridiculous. The Metro is also owned by the Daily Mail. Honestly absurd. Edited by Mstrobez (15 Mar 2023 1.41pm)
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| georgenorman 15 Mar 23 1.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
Well this is hardcore bollocks isn’t it. How can you separate the Guardian, Observer, Mirror & Sunday Mirror as separate entities just to make your first paragraph bigger, but then not list the Sunday Times, Mail on Sunday & Sunday Express in the second? Disingenuous beyond belief. And to suggest the Times isn’t on the right and insinuate the Sun is left wing is absolutely ridiculous. The Metro is also owned by the Daily Mail. Honestly absurd. Edited by Mstrobez (15 Mar 2023 1.41pm) Who cares, the number of people reading newspapers is declining at an ever accelerating rate.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 15 Mar 23 2.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
Well this is hardcore bollocks isn’t it. Nice to see you back. Is the BBS too quiet for you
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mstrobez 15 Mar 23 2.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The Hol is definitely a better bunch than on the BBS but the BBS is far more active for Palace related stuff. But I still use the HOL, especially for tickets as I don’t have a season ticket this year!
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Nicholas91  The Democratic Republic of Kent 15 Mar 23 2.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
The Hol is definitely a better bunch than on the BBS but the BBS is far more active for Palace related stuff. But I still use the HOL, especially for tickets as I don’t have a season ticket this year! I'd of thought this year, following the previous, would be the one anybody would definitely want it for. Seems prophetic now however. Apologies all, get back to the BBC, booo!, or wooo!, depending on your slant.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 15 Mar 23 2.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
Well this is hardcore bollocks isn’t it. How can you separate the Guardian, Observer, Mirror & Sunday Mirror as separate entities just to make your first paragraph bigger, but then not list the Sunday Times, Mail on Sunday & Sunday Express in the second? Disingenuous beyond belief. And to suggest the Times isn’t on the right and insinuate the Sun is left wing is absolutely ridiculous. The Metro is also owned by the Daily Mail. Honestly absurd. Edited by Mstrobez (15 Mar 2023 1.41pm) Of course. I should have just called them all one newspaper, just so you could pretend that there are more right wing newspapers. Silly me.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 15 Mar 23 3.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This is quite ironic
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Mar 23 4.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
If that's your stance, you are even more irresponsible and dangerous than I thought. Should the HOL admins be obliged to allow the posting of any message on here as long as it is within the law? I only answered that way in the hope you would disappear. So as you haven't let me explain. Firstly your analogy is ridiculous. Gary Glitter is back in prison after being recalled for breaking the conditions of his release. He would have been under close supervision, and probably wearing a tag and would be should he ever succeed in getting parole again. Sex offenders are held securely but if one ever did escape you can be sure a manhunt would follow. He wouldn't go unoticed. Secondly, any library, or other place offering advice to children would need to have who-ever was involved undergo a CRB check. But even if he managed to climb over those mile high hurdles, which is about as likely as it being a Martian doing it, what I didn't say is what else a baker should do. They should accept the commision, get his details and let him go. Being responsible, law abiding citizens they should also alert the authorities with a view to the police being on site when he called to collect. They then take over. It's not their job to enforce the law, or have a view about their customers requests. It is all our job to report suspicious behaviour. If the police consider the message to be unlawful in any way then they will deal with it. Not the bakers. The last paragraph applies to who-ever placed the order.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Mar 23 4.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Arrest people for standing silently in public streets. Arrest people for the suspected content of their silent prayers. Arrest people who have had previous contact with the police if they are perceived as acting wrongly. Prosecute businesses for refusing commissions. Persecute people for refusing vaccinations. Allow people to break their contracts of employment for (approved) political reasons. Continue to tax people to fund (approved) political propaganda. Bring in proportional representation to allow more ‘progressive’ parties power. Have MPs voting in secret, as it is no business of the public as to how they vote. Re-join the EU, of course, and offer to double our contribution as a gesture of good will and contrition. Have completely open borders in order to stop boat people – they can just pop on a ferry. Make John Bercow the Speaker for life. Edited by georgenorman (15 Mar 2023 11.01am) You remind me of another poster here in your capacity to distort and misrepresent. I won't dignify the above by correcting it. It speaks for itself and those who know it's nonsense already know, and those who don't never will.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  15 Mar 23 4.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I only answered that way in the hope you would disappear. So as you haven't let me explain. Firstly your analogy is ridiculous. Gary Glitter is back in prison after being recalled for breaking the conditions of his release. He would have been under close supervision, and probably wearing a tag and would be should he ever succeed in getting parole again. Sex offenders are held securely but if one ever did escape you can be sure a manhunt would follow. He wouldn't go unoticed. Secondly, any library, or other place offering advice to children would need to have who-ever was involved undergo a CRB check. But even if he managed to climb over those mile high hurdles, which is about as likely as it being a Martian doing it, what I didn't say is what else a baker should do. They should accept the commision, get his details and let him go. Being responsible, law abiding citizens they should also alert the authorities with a view to the police being on site when he called to collect. They then take over. It's not their job to enforce the law, or have a view about their customers requests. It is all our job to report suspicious behaviour. If the police consider the message to be unlawful in any way then they will deal with it. Not the bakers. The last paragraph applies to who-ever placed the order. Was Gary Glitter really the key point of the question?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.