You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
May 11 2024 10.36pm

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 379 of 412 < 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 >

 

View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 03 Feb 24 10.38pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

It never ceases to amaze me the amount of Houdiniesque twists and turns you do to seemingly support these types of people. If she's employed by the BBC then surely is bound by their rules of employment.
If Jack Jones who just happens to clean the khazis at the BEEB said on any of his social media accounts that he hated nigg&s and muslims you can bet your last dollar he'd be sacked/suspended & he'd probably be spending the weekend down at Sheperds Bush nick.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 03 Feb 24 11.23pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Racist loons exist everywhere in depressingly large numbers.

The Daily Mail ignores them all, except those working for organisations it wishes to harm. The BBC being its primary target.

I have rarely seen such raw racism from anyone, let alone someone who works for the supposedly neutral BBC.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 03 Feb 24 11.37pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

It’s not all right.

She isn’t though a “senior” employee at the BBC nor is she a journalist. She is an administrator. So is it appropriate for her employer to get involved in what she does in her own time, irrespective of how distasteful it might be?

Surely it’s down to the social media companies and the police to take any necessary action.

It’s another example of the Mail winding up its readership over its obsession with the BBC.

Huw Edwards sent his text messages on his own time.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 04 Feb 24 12.47am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11


She should be suspended and if the allegations proven sacked,

its the BBC. She will never get sacked.

She could sing that song from South Africa....''kill the Boer'' ? or make it British....and refer to killing the Gammons ?

and wouldn't they all laugh it all off and say you are being overly sensitive when you complain ?

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 04 Feb 24 8.13am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That’s up to the BBC to judge. Not the Daily Mail. It’s their reputation at stake alongside the need to separate someone’s private life from their work responsibilities.

After the Lineker fiasco I expect they are very wary.

That said I would not be surprised if she was quietly eased out of the door. She won’t be too popular with her colleagues.

You make it sound like it's the Mail's fault. She posted on social media and then upped the ante by saying she had broad shoulders.

It is newsworthy same as if she worked for ITV or the Sun, it's not the local church newspaper.

The BBC may decide that what she does outside doesn't matter but they would be foolish to do so.

Edited by Badger11 (04 Feb 2024 8.13am)

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 04 Feb 24 8.53am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

And another employee. Read this and perhaps people will understand what the HO is up against when trying to remove criminals.The excuses used are pathetic but not uncommon. Any one who thinks these excuses for human beings should be allowed to stay need to take a long hard look at themselves.
Before anyone says “it’s the courts” the appeal courts judge primarily on “expert” witnesses statements. I wrote hundreds as a visa officer. This woman’s testimony would have been a major factor in the decision.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View XKudu's Profile XKudu Flag The Midlands, England 04 Feb 24 9.16am Send a Private Message to XKudu Add XKudu as a friend

The problem with our system is that so-called experts can always be found to support even the most ludicrous arguments and assessments because they are being paid to do so. Money corrupts.

Solicitors have lists of willing ‘experts’ to support anything they want. All they usually need to do is raise a doubt and the judge, Tribunal or jury usually have to act in their favour because thats the way the laws are written. Obviously the flaw is that the laws are written believing all experts have the utmost integrity which isn’t the case.

Edited by XKudu (04 Feb 2024 9.17am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 04 Feb 24 10.57am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by XKudu

The problem with our system is that so-called experts can always be found to support even the most ludicrous arguments and assessments because they are being paid to do so. Money corrupts.

Solicitors have lists of willing ‘experts’ to support anything they want. All they usually need to do is raise a doubt and the judge, Tribunal or jury usually have to act in their favour because thats the way the laws are written. Obviously the flaw is that the laws are written believing all experts have the utmost integrity which isn’t the case.

Edited by XKudu (04 Feb 2024 9.17am)

ah yes. The old 'rules' argument. Would that 'Clapham Alkali Attacker' have been allowed to stay in Poland or Hungary ?

There are sensible rules and then there are shyte rules. The UK will continue harbouring Third World criminals until the place splits at the seams. Any week now. I would give the country a maximum of 3 years before it erupts into major civil strife. Something that will make 'the Troubles' in NI look like a picnic.

The two sides have already emerged from the shadows, readying themselves for the bunfight. Spain 1935, as already mentioned. You will already be familiar with four or five flags waved by each respective grouping.

And the Home Office , the courts, the BBC, and whoever else will be able to do precious little to quell the madness. The only significant thing which could pre-date this would be the same madness kicking off in France, Sweden, the Netherlands or wherever.

Geert Wilders or Marine Le Pen ? you choose. The day they become PM is the day the country explodes and the legitimacy of the democratic process will be shown for the charade that it really is.

The types who attacked the Bataclan Theatre (or 7/7 London) will never accept a Right wing PM.

Edited by PalazioVecchio (04 Feb 2024 11.51am)

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 05 Feb 24 7.58am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

He is a broadcaster and political commentator.

This lady isn’t.

The BBC sacked her on Friday, which is fair enough in my books.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 05 Feb 24 8.41am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

The BBC sacked her on Friday, which is fair enough in my books.

She made the big mistake of slagging off the Jews.
If she had just had a go at Whitey, I'm sure she'd be at her desk this morning.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View silvertop's Profile silvertop Flag Portishead 05 Feb 24 4.27pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

its the BBC. She will never get sacked.

She could sing that song from South Africa....''kill the Boer'' ? or make it British....and refer to killing the Gammons ?

and wouldn't they all laugh it all off and say you are being overly sensitive when you complain ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View silvertop's Profile silvertop Flag Portishead 05 Feb 24 4.29pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

She made the big mistake of slagging off the Jews.
If she had just had a go at Whitey, I'm sure she'd be at her desk this morning.

Regrettably I think that may be correct.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 379 of 412 < 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)