You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Premier owners
June 6 2020 9.30pm

Premier owners

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

This forum is sponsored by

Football Index

Sponsor a forum or Advertise on the HOL!

 

View bexleydave's Profile bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 17 Apr 20 2.30pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Originally posted by Aray

An interesting topic and welcome distraction from wfh. I guess this is prompted by the Saudi takeover of the Toon. Does any other Palace fan feel grateful we are not majority owned by a sadistic, misogonistic, theocracy? Harris can keep his additional dosh - he's not a benefactor but a business man. Unless you find one with very, very deep pockets you're skating on thin ice. Personally I want the club to be run as a business by decent people. The yanks (who are minority shareholders) maybe private equity types, so hardly pristine but far better than some of the alternatives in my view.

Err no; they're the largest shareholders by far. Where did you get the idea that they weren't from?

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 17 Apr 20 2.40pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by bexleydave


Err no; they're the largest shareholders by far. Where did you get the idea that they weren't from?

Harris and Blitzer have 18% of the shares each as does Parish.Accordingly, the Directors have 54% of the shares.

Edited by Willo (17 Apr 2020 2.40pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View bexleydave's Profile bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 17 Apr 20 2.49pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

Harris and Blitzer have 18% of the shares each as does Parish.Accordingly, the Directors have 54% of the shares.

Unless you have access to the ultimate holding company's records (which none of have) it's impossible to say who owns what; suffice to say that the two major US investors have a controlling interest. Unfortunately Google can't help on this one.

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 17 Apr 20 5.08pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by bexleydave

Unless you have access to the ultimate holding company's records (which none of have) it's impossible to say who owns what; suffice to say that the two major US investors have a controlling interest. Unfortunately Google can't help on this one.

Isn't it the case that other US investors own shares? unfortunately the smoke and mirrors involved shroud it in mystery

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View eagleman13's Profile eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 17 Apr 20 5.25pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Aray

An interesting topic and welcome distraction from wfh. I guess this is prompted by the Saudi takeover of the Toon. Does any other Palace fan feel grateful we are not majority owned by a sadistic, misogonistic, theocracy? Harris can keep his additional dosh - he's not a benefactor but a business man. Unless you find one with very, very deep pockets you're skating on thin ice. Personally I want the club to be run as a business by decent people. The yanks (who are minority shareholders) maybe private equity types, so hardly pristine but far better than some of the alternatives in my view.

Never thought of Mike Ashley like that, but, now you come to mention it . . . .

 


Is joining the 'Grumpy Old Gits' Club

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Apr 20 7.00pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

The board are allowed to put some cash into the club. I can't remember how much but it is something like 12 mil a season and then there is no penalty. That just about covers one or two players' wages. Something tells me that there are ways round it for other teams. Just not us, apparently.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Apr 20 7.06pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

I had wondered whether our US owners had decided to cut pay for staff in their other teams. Initially, they were going to cut salaries, but Daniel Levyed their decision. The statement from them is reasonable enough.

[Link]

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View braunstoneagle's Profile braunstoneagle Flag the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 17 Apr 20 9.09pm Send a Private Message to braunstoneagle Add braunstoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

The board are allowed to put some cash into the club. I can't remember how much but it is something like 12 mil a season and then there is no penalty. That just about covers one or two players' wages. Something tells me that there are ways round it for other teams. Just not us, apparently.

i think you are allowed to lose £105m over 3 season period to avoid FFP sanctions in the PL.

 


‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View braunstoneagle's Profile braunstoneagle Flag the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 17 Apr 20 9.13pm Send a Private Message to braunstoneagle Add braunstoneagle as a friend

also i would much rather have SP as an owner and flirt with mid-table than have that s***house who has brought noocastle, even if they do invest heavily and get champs league.

genuinely cannot believe their fans are happy having this guy over ashley, who ran the club properly.

 


‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 18 Apr 20 3.26am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

The misogony ( sic ) doesn't prevent being in a consortium put together by a woman.

I am no fan of Saudi Arabia or political posturing on football forums.

Originally posted by Aray

An interesting topic and welcome distraction from wfh. I guess this is prompted by the Saudi takeover of the Toon. Does any other Palace fan feel grateful we are not majority owned by a sadistic, misogonistic, theocracy? Harris can keep his additional dosh - he's not a benefactor but a business man. Unless you find one with very, very deep pockets you're skating on thin ice. Personally I want the club to be run as a business by decent people. The yanks (who are minority shareholders) maybe private equity types, so hardly pristine but far better than some of the alternatives in my view.

 


Let's see SP and the board trying to line up for a piss in the AW toilets at half time before peddling the new stand. We're the Arthur over here and the facilities are a disgrace

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 18 Apr 20 3.27am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

If you have a poll of Toon fans on the question " Did Ashley run the club properly, yes or no , you think there would be a yes majority?

Just asking

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

also i would much rather have SP as an owner and flirt with mid-table than have that s***house who has brought noocastle, even if they do invest heavily and get champs league.

genuinely cannot believe their fans are happy having this guy over ashley, who ran the club properly.

 


Let's see SP and the board trying to line up for a piss in the AW toilets at half time before peddling the new stand. We're the Arthur over here and the facilities are a disgrace

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ARGILE OLD GEEZER's Profile ARGILE OLD GEEZER Flag PORTIMAO 18 Apr 20 9.05am Send a Private Message to ARGILE OLD GEEZER Add ARGILE OLD GEEZER as a friend

Originally posted by bexleydave

Err no; they're the largest shareholders by far. Where did you get the idea that they weren't from?

No, they are not he largest share holder they only hold 36% between them, Parish and a few other share holders can out vote then, of course if they sided with the yanks they would win the vote

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Premier owners