Disappointed in the absence of McArthur and Viera’s preference of Mateta over Edouard as he has yet to convince

I always hope, with Schluppy in, we can get the left flank going, all supposing Wilf's up for it. I do like it when Schlupp bursts forward on one of his runs. Although, I admit, it's a possible rather than a probable.Lol.

Seem to recall a similar barrage against schlupp last week...

Mateta has been crud but he is now bound to score.

I agree ... not our best team on paper but leaves PV with strong substitutions if things aren't going to plan.

Denial is not just a river in Egypt

Can't understand why Hughes is on the bench, has been our most consistent performer week in week out. And Mateta.....

"Billy Gilbert really is God"

Hughes is good at keeping the ball moving with short passes but otherwise, he is very limited. No speed, goal threat or ability to play incisive passes. He had two chances to clear the ball against Burnley and that cost us two points

I agree Mateta is clumsy and not that good as a hold-up player. However, he did take a swing for the goal that got deflected to Kouyate the other day. Would Benteke have done the same? Eduoard has been most effective when playing on the left. His height advantage over full-backs and dribbling ability comes into play. Unfortunately, Wilf plays there

And Mateta almost scores