You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Akshata Murty tax affairs
May 26 2022 3.03am

Akshata Murty tax affairs

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 20 of 23 < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 >

 

View BlueJay's Profile BlueJay Flag UK 19 Apr 22 12.52am Send a Private Message to BlueJay Add BlueJay as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Ok. Let's simplify this. A 'yes' or 'no' answer is what is required. Can you link us to a post of mine where I wrote 'taxpayer' and 'outraged idiot' in the same sentence? If you can't, or won't, answer with a 'yes' or 'no', we'll know you made it up. Aka (an acronym you like), a liar.

What you say and mean is a mystery to you alone..

dying-wish.jpg Attachment: dying-wish.jpg (86.07Kb)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 19 Apr 22 1.02am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Shouldnít really give someone the time of day while they sit there at home calling anyone an idiot for having an opinion or being angry about anything that is blatantly wrong and wrong by design and fine with the person(s) in power using it. I expect he picks up The Daily Mail frothing at the mouth every single morning without fail. But everyone else is an outraged idiot for not accepting the status quo or believing they can change all the unfairness in a century old two party system. Idiot? Ironically THE ranter.

Seriously, how old are you? This is embarrassingly juvenile.

I know this is a football supporter's forum, but the level of intelligence is astoundingly deficient. And I'm not even aiming that specifically at you.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 19 Apr 22 1.25am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

May I suggest you occasionally check facts. Google is your friend

She is indeed resident but not ordinarily resident.

I have taken your suggestion on board (I wouldn't use Google though). But I didn't state she was a resident either here or any other place. That was you. Peruse.

"It is that she lives in the UK, which is clearly her main residence" 17/4/22 00:34am.

"As a non-resident she has no right to NHS services unless she pays for them" 17/4/22 10:15am

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 19 Apr 22 1.29am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Seriously, how old are you? This is embarrassingly juvenile.

I know this is a football supporter's forum, but the level of intelligence is astoundingly deficient. And I'm not even aiming that specifically at you.

Outraged idiot

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 19 Apr 22 1.34am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

I am really astonished at the lack of intelligence coming from some of the posters on this site. To be mis-quoted, and then have others quote the mis-quote is unique. I have never come across such stupidity in my life. No wonder Palace fans got the tag 'Nigels'! Some can't even reply with a yes or no answer, and resort to visual aids. Pathetic.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 19 Apr 22 1.36am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Outraged idiot

Wow. You know how to stun 'em!

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 19 Apr 22 2.20am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

May I suggest you occasionally check facts. Google is your friend

She is indeed resident but not ordinarily resident.

Your research is better than mine and I stand corrected.

 


If untruths and bllshit are allowed to flourish unchallenged the forum will be the worse for it.

Opinions are not facts just because you believe them

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View robdave2k's Profile robdave2k Flag 19 Apr 22 7.19am Send a Private Message to robdave2k Add robdave2k as a friend

I work in accountancy and when you read the accounting press reaction thatís quite telling in these things. You know who the cowboys are and you know who the sensible and pragmatic experts are too. With heavy avoidance (think Jimmy Carr, Rangers etc) the more sensible and reserved commentators were universal in condemnation, with this itís more nuanced.

Thereís a conception that all accountants are anti-tax, we arenít. I pay my taxes - like every other citizen and Iíve fired clients for abusing the Covid schemes. Likewise Iíll never be millionaire doing my job and nor do I want to be. We all have a moral obligation to contribute and like the majority here Iím in the group that gets shafted come Budget time every year!

Most tax-avoidance was built off interpretation of legislation, built off identifying comments of ambiguity or one item in a piece of legislation and generally - they come crashing down later. What AM did is use something that exists and is used not just by the wealthy. Itís entirely possible itís a trust setup by her father.

My main issue with this is the lack of political savvy, surely to f*** someone said to Rishi (when he became chancellor) ďyou know what mate, I know it ainít illegal but this donít look too clever to the man on the street!Ē Should a person that naive be making policy!

Itís easy to say close the loophole, the status of domicile and resident isnít just tied to this country and itís policy that needs a worldwide approach to deal with havens (and it does need dealing with)

Edited by robdave2k (19 Apr 2022 7.20am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 19 Apr 22 7.41am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

She pays remittance. And she very likely spends more money than you. Her contributions to HMRC almost definitely outweigh yours. Unless you are a millionaire and paying all your dues?

FFS read! She doesnít pay contributions other than the £30k which, FWIW, is less than my income tax and she only just started despite 9 years living in the UK with her family.

She will have no need to remit, they will live off Sunak when in the UK. So no tax. And no other apparent UK earnings.

To pay tax on a remittance basis you have to transfer offshore money to the UK, OK?

Sunakís money will be what they spend, nothing from her Dividends.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 19 Apr 22 10.53am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Wow. You know how to stun 'em!

Like you holding up a mirror to yourself

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 19 Apr 22 11.06pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

Your research is better than mine and I stand corrected.

In truth not much research needed.

Iíve handled loads of these, itís my job.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 20 Apr 22 12.42am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

FFS read! She doesnít pay contributions other than the £30k which, FWIW, is less than my income tax and she only just started despite 9 years living in the UK with her family.

She will have no need to remit, they will live off Sunak when in the UK. So no tax. And no other apparent UK earnings.

To pay tax on a remittance basis you have to transfer offshore money to the UK, OK?

Sunakís money will be what they spend, nothing from her Dividends.

I can read. You just can't comprehend. She doesn't have to pay income tax. She doesn't earn her income in this country, and is not a registered citizen. Also, she is allowed to live off her husband's income. She is the mother of his children, and has been since they were born. And I doubt she was paid maternity leave. As the law stands, she will be treated as a British taxpayer in due course. As I have said before, if you don't like the tax rules, go and protest for change. Berating her, and trying to blame Sunak stinks of envy. Even if you do earn over £100k pa.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 20 of 23 < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Akshata Murty tax affairs