You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Zaha CF or W
March 29 2024 1.48am

Zaha CF or W

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > Last >>

 

View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 16 Aug 22 10.49am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Has Wilf become a bet CF than a winger he is definately the best finisher and times his runs well, maybe if we buy Antoine Semenyo he is LW material, the bits i have seen on youtube he reminds me of Wilf

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View MrRobbo's Profile MrRobbo Flag Purley 16 Aug 22 11.00am Send a Private Message to MrRobbo Add MrRobbo as a friend

Depends on the game.

If we are going to sit back and counter, play him up top.

If we are going to hold most of the ball, play him wide and a CF and an AMC

Broadly he operates best when he has space, in most games that will be out wide

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 16 Aug 22 11.03am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Has Wilf become a bet CF than a winger he is definately the best finisher and times his runs well, maybe if we buy Antoine Semenyo he is LW material, the bits i have seen on youtube he reminds me of Wilf

Not uncommon to see players of a certain quality, hit certain ages and switch positions to better suit their new 'mobility' status.

Wilf doesn't quite look as blistering as before which was very helpful on the wing but I think has all the requirements for a very good CF:

- Not blistering, but still quick
- Strength and determination
- Tricky, if not the trickiest feet
- Can beat a man, can beat several men if necessary
- Can absolutely bullet the ball
- Can now finish astutely
- Can pick a pass if another player in a better position
- Can time a run

I would be keen and I'd also add I'd far more fancy our chances in signing a decent LW than signing an effective CF.

Jut my opinion of course

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View TheBigToePunt's Profile TheBigToePunt Flag 16 Aug 22 11.43am Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

It all depends on...

1. Whether we have a better option than Zaha at centre forward

2. Whether playing Zaha upfront allows a better balance in midfield.

On the first point, neither Mateta or Edouard have shown evidence they can trouble top premier league defences, lead the line and score 15-20 goals. We don't miss either of them when Zaha goes up top.

On the second point, there is no point in having a long-term policy of buying and developing exciting young players if the formation and team selection locks them out. Olise and Eze must play most games if fit, and a space must be left open for the likes of Plange, Ebiowei, the returning Rak-Sakyi et al to get a regular run out.

Moving Zaha up top allows us to use two holding midfielders (Docoure and Hughes would be my preference, though the former will need time to adapt) plus Eze, Olise, and then either a young wide-attacker in some games, or an extra central midfielder in others. Moving Wilf to the wing blocks a path for Plange, Ebiowei etc.

One thing is for sure, whether he plays on the wing or upfront we get the same sides of the same coin from Wilf as ever - he will give the ball away foolishly when simple passes were available, display petulance when he should be focusing, and waste some eye-catching opportunities. In between all this, he will continue to provide a moment or two every week of the kind of match-winning quality that nobody else in the squad, and very few in the history of the club, are capable of.

Edited by TheBigToePunt (16 Aug 2022 11.45am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 16 Aug 22 11.46am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

It all depends on...

1. Whether we have a better option than Zaha at centre forward

2. Whether playing Zaha upfront allows a better balance in midfield.

On the first point, neither Mateta or Edouard have shown evidence they can trouble top premier league defences, lead the line and score 15-20 goals. We don't miss either of them when Zaha goes up top.

On the second point, there is no point in having a long-term policy of buying and developing exciting young players if the formation and team selection locks them out. Olise and Eze must play most games if fit, and a space must be left open for the likes of Plange, Ebiowei, the returning Rak-Sakyi et al to get a regular run out.

Moving Zaha up top allows us to use two holding midfielders (Docoure and Hughes would be my preference, though the former will need time to adapt) plus Eze, Olise, and then either a young wide-attacker in some games, or an extra central midfielder in others.

One thing is for sure, whether he plays on the wing or upfront we get the same sides of the same coin from Wilf as ever - he will give the ball away foolishly when simple passes were available, display petulance when he should be focusing, and waste some eye-catching opportunities. In between all this, he will continue to provide a moment or two every week of the kind of match-winning quality that nobody else in the squad, and very few in the history of the club, are capable of.

I garland these comments with concurrence and praise.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 16 Aug 22 12.27pm Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

It all depends on...

1. Whether we have a better option than Zaha at centre forward

2. Whether playing Zaha upfront allows a better balance in midfield.

On the first point, neither Mateta or Edouard have shown evidence they can trouble top premier league defences, lead the line and score 15-20 goals. We don't miss either of them when Zaha goes up top.

On the second point, there is no point in having a long-term policy of buying and developing exciting young players if the formation and team selection locks them out. Olise and Eze must play most games if fit, and a space must be left open for the likes of Plange, Ebiowei, the returning Rak-Sakyi et al to get a regular run out.

Moving Zaha up top allows us to use two holding midfielders (Docoure and Hughes would be my preference, though the former will need time to adapt) plus Eze, Olise, and then either a young wide-attacker in some games, or an extra central midfielder in others. Moving Wilf to the wing blocks a path for Plange, Ebiowei etc.

One thing is for sure, whether he plays on the wing or upfront we get the same sides of the same coin from Wilf as ever - he will give the ball away foolishly when simple passes were available, display petulance when he should be focusing, and waste some eye-catching opportunities. In between all this, he will continue to provide a moment or two every week of the kind of match-winning quality that nobody else in the squad, and very few in the history of the club, are capable of.

Edited by TheBigToePunt (16 Aug 2022 11.45am)

The problem with the three you mentioned, along with Olise they are all Left-Footed, Where Semenyo is Right-Footed

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PatrickA's Profile PatrickA Flag London 16 Aug 22 12.55pm Send a Private Message to PatrickA Add PatrickA as a friend

On the two occasions we won at Man C , under both Hodgson and Vieira, Wilf played down the middle .
It is evident that against the top teams where we’re unlikely to see much of the ball, Vieira has shown a willingness to play Wilf as a lone front man.
For me it’s not a long term solution and only to be used for specific games.
In fact yesterday I was hoping that when Ayew came off for Edouard yesterday Zaha would move to the right with Edouard down the middle.
Edouard does his best work in the penalty area and gets his shots away.
Zaha often wants an extra touch as when the ball was rolled across the area to him yesterday and he can be over elaborate.
It could also be argued that Mateta is a better option as a one touch finisher than Zaha.
This is not a criticism of Wilf - he’s skill is there for everyone to see, but occasionally there is one twist or turn too many.
Finishers like Vardy or Aguero have one aim - to hit the back of the net.
Murray was the last genuine finisher we had in my view.
Benteke scored goals in his first season but his movement in the penalty area was not that of a genuine predator and he seemed to lack desire and intent.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rollercoaster's Profile rollercoaster Flag Cornwall 16 Aug 22 1.14pm Send a Private Message to rollercoaster Add rollercoaster as a friend

For me, the dilemma is getting Wilf, EZe and Olise in the same team, keep the balance and get enough goals. Eze is really good at number 10, like yesterday but doesn't score enough, Wilf on his owm, up-top is too light-weight for games against all but the top teams. Optimally for Wilf, Eze and Olise, we need to play more 4-4-2, with Wilf and ANO up top but the two remaining midfielders need to be top-notch so we really need a better partner for Decoure.

Vieira is still singling Ayew out for praise at his press conferences so it seems we are unlikely to get our wish and see less of him in the team.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 16 Aug 22 1.23pm Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

It all depends on...

1. Whether we have a better option than Zaha at centre forward

2. Whether playing Zaha upfront allows a better balance in midfield.

On the first point, neither Mateta or Edouard have shown evidence they can trouble top premier league defences, lead the line and score 15-20 goals. We don't miss either of them when Zaha goes up top.

Edited by TheBigToePunt (16 Aug 2022 11.45am)


Firstly, I agree with much of the rest of your post (which I have deleted from mine for space reasons).

As for the two strikers you are dismissing because they don't trouble top defences etc.:
- All 5 of Edouard's goals in open play last season came against Spurs, Arsenal Liverpool and West Ham (the other was a penalty against Norwich).
- Mateta tends to bully the lesser teams and has a role to play against them IMO.
- Neither striker has been given a long enough run to determine their effectiveness. On the basis of minutes played the two strikers are scoring at the equivalent of 14/15 goals a season in open play. If you don't include one of them in the team, who will make up their goal tally if Zaha plays centrally all the time? I can see Olise getting a few if he's played regularly but beyond that I don't see anyone else.

Edited by doombear (16 Aug 2022 1.24pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View TheBigToePunt's Profile TheBigToePunt Flag 16 Aug 22 1.34pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

The problem with the three you mentioned, along with Olise they are all Left-Footed, Where Semenyo is Right-Footed

If Semenyo is signed, and proves to be of the same standard as Olise and Eze then I'm sure he could offer balance, though personally, I think we have become so used to seeing wingers drive infield onto their stronger foot that we forget the benefits of a left footed player on the left. Schlupp, for instance, offers something different when he plays wide left on occasion. I certainly wouldn't discount a promising left footed player from playing on the left.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View TheBigToePunt's Profile TheBigToePunt Flag 16 Aug 22 1.58pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

Originally posted by doombear


Firstly, I agree with much of the rest of your post (which I have deleted from mine for space reasons).

As for the two strikers you are dismissing because they don't trouble top defences etc.:
- All 5 of Edouard's goals in open play last season came against Spurs, Arsenal Liverpool and West Ham (the other was a penalty against Norwich).
- Mateta tends to bully the lesser teams and has a role to play against them IMO.
- Neither striker has been given a long enough run to determine their effectiveness. On the basis of minutes played the two strikers are scoring at the equivalent of 14/15 goals a season in open play. If you don't include one of them in the team, who will make up their goal tally if Zaha plays centrally all the time? I can see Olise getting a few if he's played regularly but beyond that I don't see anyone else.

Edited by doombear (16 Aug 2022 1.24pm)

I would expect Zaha to get goals if he played up top, and also place pressure on Eze and Olise to get more this season, as that seems the next phase of development for them both. If Zaha plays up top we will also have space for an extra attacking wide player or midfielder, who should also be expected to contribute.

I take your point regarding who Edouard scored against, and Mateta being an awkward opponent for lesser sides, but as per my previous post I don't feel like we miss either of them when they don't play.

I know it's early days, and I hope he will develop and do well, but there is a reason we are still linked with strikers even after spending money on Edouard. I thought he really struggled last year.

His disappointing goal return is explained in part by the time he spent on the bench or on the wing, but he spent so much time on the bench and the wing because his all-round game as a centre-forward was so flaky. He seems to lack killer pace and/or the timing of runs in behind, but isn't very good with his back to goal either. He has little obvious penalty box movement (he doesn't nip across the defender at the front post, or peel off to attack the back post etc), and looks instead to get the ball to feet so he can try and use close control and skill to make shooting chances. He seems very much an individualist, and hasn't shown signs of doing the work a centre forward must for the team. If we are going to accept poor team play in exchange for individual skill, might as well just use Wilf up top - he is far more likely to win us a game.

In my opinion, Mateta must wake up and think it's Christmas every day. I just can't believe he ever gets a game, awkward customer to play against or not. Even if you feel I'm being harsh, try this exercise - give all the Palace forwards a nominal score out of ten, or a transfer market value (presuming they all had the same contract length). Then pick the three attacking players who have the highest score/value. I'd be amazed if Mateta was in anyone's most valuable front line. I appreciate that teams need balance and blend, but when it comes to Mateta we are accepting too distinct a lack of quality in exchange for effort.

Edited by TheBigToePunt (16 Aug 2022 2.03pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 16 Aug 22 2.33pm Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by rollercoaster

For me, the dilemma is getting Wilf, EZe and Olise in the same team, keep the balance and get enough goals. Eze is really good at number 10, like yesterday but doesn't score enough, Wilf on his owm, up-top is too light-weight for games against all but the top teams. Optimally for Wilf, Eze and Olise, we need to play more 4-4-2, with Wilf and ANO up top but the two remaining midfielders need to be top-notch so we really need a better partner for Decoure.

Vieira is still singling Ayew out for praise at his press conferences so it seems we are unlikely to get our wish and see less of him in the team.

Give him 6/7 more games, he has only played 2 since being fully fit

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Zaha CF or W