Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
From Coppell onwards the best and worst palace managers (at least 20 games) by win ratio: Dave Bassett 48.33 George Burley 28.00 I think from this list, Pulis and Pardew come out well, although Pardew spent alot, Dowie is mainly because he inherited AJ, Hodgson and Warnock look bad but didn't spend much, PV is ongoing (at the moment)
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
From Coppell onwards the best and worst palace managers (at least 20 games) by win ratio: Dave Bassett 48.33 George Burley 28.00 I think from this list, Pulis and Pardew come out well, although Pardew spent alot, Dowie is mainly because he inherited AJ, Hodgson and Warnock look bad but didn't spend much, PV is ongoing (at the moment) Hopefully for not much longer.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Thought Trevor Francis would be in the mix for worst Palace manager stats. He truly was a clueless clown.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by eagleheath
Thought Trevor Francis would be in the mix for worst Palace manager stats. He truly was a clueless clown. He has got a 5-0 win against the Weed on his resume though!
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
From Coppell onwards the best and worst palace managers (at least 20 games) by win ratio: Dave Bassett 48.33 George Burley 28.00 I think from this list, Pulis and Pardew come out well, although Pardew spent alot, Dowie is mainly because he inherited AJ, Hodgson and Warnock look bad but didn't spend much, PV is ongoing (at the moment) For me, evidence that statistics are misleading. Pardew, to my mind, was one of the worst managers we've ever had. And in contrast, who thinks any of the bottom five are worse managers than Peter Taylor? Lists like this take no account of the circumstances the managers faced and the players they had at their disposal.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
From Coppell onwards the best and worst palace managers (at least 20 games) by win ratio: Dave Bassett 48.33 George Burley 28.00 I think from this list, Pulis and Pardew come out well, although Pardew spent alot, Dowie is mainly because he inherited AJ, Hodgson and Warnock look bad but didn't spend much, PV is ongoing (at the moment) Dowie was not my favourite manager but getting the squad fit including AJ was the reason for the promotion that first season. I am surprised at SC being so low albeit in 5th and most of his time was in the top tier. I am very surprised at Dave B being that high but those were different days. Interesting set of stats though, a bit of a blockbuster you could say
Just retired and almost mastered decorating with the gardening slowly improving |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by crystal-purley
Dowie was not my favourite manager but getting the squad fit including AJ was the reason for the promotion that first season. I am surprised at SC being so low albeit in 5th and most of his time was in the top tier. I am very surprised at Dave B being that high but those were different days. Interesting set of stats though, a bit of a blockbuster you could say As others have posted there is no context to these lists. Sir Steve had at least one spell where he saved the club with kids whilst the first team was being sold under him. He was a great manager.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
As others have posted there is no context to these lists. Sir Steve had at least one spell where he saved the club with kids whilst the first team was being sold under him. He was a great manager. Agreed with Steve being top of the list really, and the worst five should not have Hodgson or Warnock in them, although the two worst were awful
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
If we're honest, probably the most impressive performer on that list is Pulis because 1. he was here for a very short time, 2. he inherited a far poorer team than the others in the top 5, and 3. he got the results he did when our backs were firmly against the wall. His record isn't inflated by easy wins in meaningless, mid-table games; in the short time Pulis was with us, every game mattered. In context, what he achieved was remarkable whether you liked his football or not.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
From Coppell onwards the best and worst palace managers (at least 20 games) by win ratio: Dave Bassett 48.33 George Burley 28.00 I think from this list, Pulis and Pardew come out well, although Pardew spent alot, Dowie is mainly because he inherited AJ, Hodgson and Warnock look bad but didn't spend much, PV is ongoing (at the moment) How did Big Sam get on with his win ratio ?
Putin Go Fvck Yourself |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Agreed. Originally posted by sydtheeagle
If we're honest, probably the most impressive performer on that list is Pulis because 1. he was here for a very short time, 2. he inherited a far poorer team than the others in the top 5, and 3. he got the results he did when our backs were firmly against the wall. His record isn't inflated by easy wins in meaningless, mid-table games; in the short time Pulis was with us, every game mattered. In context, what he achieved was remarkable whether you liked his football or not.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Croydon-Trucker
How did Big Sam get on with his win ratio ? 37.5
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2022 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.