Coronavirus (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Spiderman  Horsham 17 May 20 6.38pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
I thought the same. Funny how any interview Wissie disagrees with is a conspiracy theory ( or is it an opinion Wissie?). WHO have lost a lot of credibility in my household, Andrew Marr show, does he not “diss” the torrid at every opportunity? Met him once, horrible man
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 17 May 20 6.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
Michael Gove says it is safe for schools to re-open. ""You can never eliminate risk," he said. "It is the case that it is extremely unlikely that any school is likely to be the source of a Covid outbreak." (BBC website, 17 May 2020) My understanding is that schools have the potential to be the very hotbeds of proliferation of CV19. Especially in Primary schools where children have little understanding of hygiene or social distancing. Coupled with parents who are returning to work and increased socialising, makes schools a very high-risk destination. The BMA and Scientific Education specialists agree with my thoughts (or I agree with theirs) Opening schools will kill shed-loads. But perhaps that won't be a bad thing. Because the House of Commons was full today,....like it's safe. Don’t hold back. Say it how you see it. Through the eyes of an hysterical person.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 May 20 7.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
It's the same WHO who are doing their utmost to understand and advise us all on this crisis, despite the politicising of it coming from some quarters. Notably in Washington. The assertions that they "bent over backwards for the Chinese government" is as best unproven and at worst a downright political lie. It is certainly an irrelevance at the moment when all nations should be working together and not trying to divert attention by trying to score political points with certain sections of their society.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  17 May 20 7.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by palace_in_frogland
That’s exactly how I’d always imagined you looked... No. Imagine if Paul Newman had overdosed on handsome pills.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 May 20 7.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
I thought the same. Funny how any interview Wissie disagrees with is a conspiracy theory ( or is it an opinion Wissie?). WHO have lost a lot of credibility in my household, Andrew Marr show, does he not “diss” the torrid at every opportunity? Met him once, horrible man Then you must be another who take what is said by the great orange leader and his sycophantic followers as the unvarnished truth. So you don't like the interviewer! So what. He wasn't being interviewed. Listen to the message and not how it is delivered. If you actually checked out the other "interview" that was referenced you will see it has about as much sense as an interview with Icke. Even if you distrust the WHO on some fronts surely you must accept a non-political senior scientist to give an objective assessment. Watch the interview and then judge.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 17 May 20 7.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
An article questioning the WHO from three years ago.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 17 May 20 8.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Then you must be another who take what is said by the great orange leader and his sycophantic followers as the unvarnished truth. So you don't like the interviewer! So what. He wasn't being interviewed. Listen to the message and not how it is delivered. If you actually checked out the other "interview" that was referenced you will see it has about as much sense as an interview with Icke. Even if you distrust the WHO on some fronts surely you must accept a non-political senior scientist to give an objective assessment. Watch the interview and then judge. You need to take a chill pill. How do you know the senior scientist is non-political? or is that just your opinion? I made no mention of the interview being discussed, I do not like Andrew Marr or his programme, sorry.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 17 May 20 8.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It's the same WHO who are doing their utmost to understand and advise us all on this crisis, despite the politicising of it coming from some quarters. Notably in Washington. The assertions that they "bent over backwards for the Chinese government" is as best unproven and at worst a downright political lie. It is certainly an irrelevance at the moment when all nations should be working together and not trying to divert attention by trying to score political points with certain sections of their society. didnt say bent over backwards, they bent over forwards pal, allowed the chinese leaders to shaft them good and proper
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 17 May 20 8.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I'm not saying what your particular home does or doesn't do, I'm saying what has been documented to have happened in others. I already highlighted in my previous post the issue of staff bringing it in "Quarantining is worthwhile, but it clearly hasn't been particularly successful and asymptomatic staff likely bring it into the environment too." Again, I'm not personalising it, you keep imagining I'm talking about you and your approach personally. I'm talking about the lack of successful planning from the top and the body count. It is what it is. Correct. You either apply lock down/quarantine too all or don't bother with it.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 17 May 20 8.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
To be fair I would take the opinion of someone living in the US, over someone who has friends there, any day of the week. Poor response imo Amen to that.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
palace_in_frogland  In a broken dream 17 May 20 8.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Amen to that. Ecumenical bender.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 17 May 20 8.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Correct. You either apply lock down/quarantine too all or don't bother with it. I think the distancing and keeping clean is in the brain for most now. That fundamentally should be enough to start seeing off this bug. It's all about psychology and getting us to do what we have been advised. Protect others is now my slogan, in the hope that others are thinking the same.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.