You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Pawson and Friend apology/dropped
April 29 2024 7.41am

Pawson and Friend apology/dropped

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 17 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

 

View Palace Old Geezer's Profile Palace Old Geezer Flag Midhurst 26 Jan 22 11.34am Send a Private Message to Palace Old Geezer Add Palace Old Geezer as a friend

BTP, a thoughtful and well constructed post from you as always.

I suspect you're not alone at feeling disillusioned with the game of professional football we watch today, mostly because of the blatant cheating and poor standards of officiating we have to endure.

However the thrill of seeing whether our team can chalk up a famous victory will always keep us hooked.

 


Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 26 Jan 22 11.39am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

Good post. However I must take issue regarding the 2nd goal, it is conclusive. Laws clearly state if play is interfering with play or distracts defender whilst in offside position it is offside. All pundits I have heard say it was offside as Firmino being there caused Mitchell to go towards him rather the Oxlade-Chamberlain. Friend was told immediately there was no reason to rule goal out, he touched his earpiece, so some communication was relayed.

I suppose one could consider that even if Firmino had been onside Mitchell might still have been drawn inside towards him rather than in a wider position picking up Oxlade-Chamberlain.

Overall a poor goal to concede from a defensive organisational standpoint and the fact that Jota was in acres of space,unchallenged outside the area and had all the time to deliver the cross.
One can take umbrage with the officating but the goals we have been conceding are a real cause for concern.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View NEILLO's Profile NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 26 Jan 22 12.01pm Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

My interest is in where this takes us now.

There has been overwhelming, widespread crtitisism of the officiating at Saturday's game. Hot on the heels of Alan Shearer's comments about refereeing standards on a recent MOTD.

VAR was introduced to mitigate ' clear and obvious errors ' by referees. It's deployment, together with the ridiculous interpretation of the offside and handball rules, merely seems to have added another layer of controversy.

I thought some progress was being made earlier this season, but if anything things have now taken a turn for the worse.

VAR usage has become as inconsistent as the referees on field decision making.

We can't overturn Saturdays result. But we have a right to demand that the authorities recognise poor performance from matchday officials, including the VAR viewer, and make them accountable.

At the present time the standards are making a mockery of the premium product that the EPL claims to be.

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View mtp1958's Profile mtp1958 Flag Grays 26 Jan 22 12.10pm Send a Private Message to mtp1958 Add mtp1958 as a friend

Back in my day god that was along time ago , i said to a ref after being flagged for offside i wasnt interfering with play , simple reply if im not interfering play what am i doing on the pitch .

they have changed the rule so much so often the old standing joke if you find a woman who can explain the off side rule marry her , now if a woman knows get her to ref the game she would be to clever for most men,

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View the silurian's Profile the silurian Flag The garden of England.(not really) 26 Jan 22 12.13pm Send a Private Message to the silurian Add the silurian as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

I suppose one could consider that even if Firmino had been onside Mitchell might still have been drawn inside towards him rather than in a wider position picking up Oxlade-Chamberlain.

Overall a poor goal to concede from a defensive organisational standpoint and the fact that Jota was in acres of space,unchallenged outside the area and had all the time to deliver the cross.
One can take umbrage with the officating but the goals we have been conceding are a real cause for concern.

Anything rather than blaming the corrupt incompetent referee eh?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 26 Jan 22 12.22pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

I suppose one could consider that even if Firmino had been onside Mitchell might still have been drawn inside towards him rather than in a wider position picking up Oxlade-Chamberlain.

Overall a poor goal to concede from a defensive organisational standpoint and the fact that Jota was in acres of space,unchallenged outside the area and had all the time to deliver the cross.
One can take umbrage with the officating but the goals we have been conceding are a real cause for concern.

Irrelevant what may have happened if Firmino was onside because the fact is, according to the laws of the game he was offside and there is absolutely no
excuse for VAR to have missed it. Whatever you may think of our defending, the one aspect that is indefensible was the disgraceful performance of the officials, no doubt you disagree but you are very much in the minority

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 26 Jan 22 12.25pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by the silurian


Anything rather than blaming the corrupt incompetent referee eh?

Clearly we are not 'Birds on the same twig' apropos officials, in fact we have always had a difference of opinion on this matter.

I have no desire to enter a protracted debate on this issue as it will only disintegrate into a dastardly Willo thread.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 26 Jan 22 12.49pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

Firstly, let's be clear - the penalty decision robbed us of what very small chance remained of atoning for yet more s*** Palace defending against a set-piece and a cross in the air. Liverpool had us chasing shadows for the first half an hour, but that's exactly when we most need to hang on in the game and avoid poor defensive mistakes. We didn't.

For the first goal, Schlupp is marking Fabinho but leaves him late to run with Van Dyke, thereby blocking what small chance Andersen had of tracking the Dutchman. For the second, our midfield shape is so bad that Andersen gets dragged over to meet Robertson, leaving Jota in oceans of space, and pulling both Guehi and Mitchell over into a fragile 2v3 behind him.

Even if we somehow overlook the poor quality of our finishing we have to mull over the poor defending when analysing the defeat. I'm sure our manager will be looking at both issues far more than the officiating, whatever he says in public.

Turning to the decisions nonetheless: VAR itself is neither good nor bad for the game really, it's all about how it is used. Also, remember that we have had our fair share of gifts from VAR, including unreal decisions away at United and Arsenal, so let's not tell ourselves a tale of bias against the little guy here. We are dealing with incredibly poor decisions and inconsistent processes, but not bias.

The argument that offside should be given against Firmino is not conclusive, but what I am amazed by is that VAR didn't seem to look at it even once. Compare this to the twenty replays they poured over for the penalty decision. The on-field ref gave nothing both times, so why the vast difference in VAR approach?

Regarding the penalty, it all comes down to a sensible understanding of what a foul is, and what cheating is. At the start of this season, the league said they would avoid giving soft free-kicks for minimal contacts, and would also stop being overly forensic with VAR replays.

For the first few months that worked so well that Klopp and Solskjaer were moaning about their precious babies being roughed up, and the leagues forward players seemed to be spending a bit more time playing the game and bit less time falling over. The tempo and flow of games became noticeably better once it became more about actually playing, and less about 'winning' decisions.

Now it's lapsed back towards last season: A soul-destroying clipboard full of technicalities rather than a football match.

For me, if you can't see the offence with the naked eye and at normal speed then the margin for human error has not been breached. The normal speed aspect is critical - all pundits agree that slow-motion makes any contact look worse, but what they neglect to mention is that it's only when watching play at normal speed that one can fully appreciate the change of direction and momentum that the nations leading s***houses employ when jumping away from the path of the ball and into a nearby defender, thereby initiating the 'foul' they benefit from. Kane has done it for years, Jota did it on Sunday. Wilf and Ayew have their moments, albeit in a slightly different style.

Many footballers will play as far beyond the letter and spirit of the laws of the game as they are allowed to. These are highly competitive animals under far greater pressure to win than to play honestly, and we are all to blame for that. What I find increasingly difficult to understand is how VAR officials (who referee live games too don't forget), somehow fail to consider the tricks that modern forwards call upon the moment a slow-motion replay switches on.

Baffling, alienating nonsense that pushes me further away from professional football and further towards watching the non-league game instead.

Edited by TheBigToePunt (26 Jan 2022 10.49am)

Very much agree with the bit in highlight, and it certainly suggests the refs are people with very limited experience of playing the game to any sort of reasonable standard. Some of the things they fall for are so obvious to anyone who has, even in real time.

It's ruining the sport - there's 0 honour left in the game, winning at all costs is the only approach these days. It's a shame.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View eagleman13's Profile eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 26 Jan 22 1.01pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Very much agree with the bit in highlight, and it certainly suggests the refs are people with very limited experience of playing the game to any sort of reasonable standard. Some of the things they fall for are so obvious to anyone who has, even in real time.

It's ruining the sport - there's 0 honour left in the game, winning at all costs is the only approach these days. It's a shame.

This is a very valid point, there was a debate on here years ago & as an ex-ref as well as an ex-assessor the simple answer as to why refs haven't hardly had any footballing experience is because, atm, in this country, as well as elsewhere, to make it to the very top of refereeing, you need to start from the age of 14.

Football in this country is basically run by the county associations, & if your face don't fit, thats it, no progress. Happened to me when i was starting out(although i was late 20's) i had to officiate in other counties so my grades could be assessed & enable me to progress to the level i reached till i was obliged to retire at 48, thats when i took my Assessors exams & continued in the game as well as working.

There have been calls for ex-players to become refs, that went well, think the figure that applied was about 30 & only 18 passed the test(says a lot). I totally agree that it does look like they haven't got a scooby when players 'con' them, because they don't know themselves.

 


I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold,
When a blind man cries, Lord, he feels it from his soul.
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 26 Jan 22 1.03pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Very much agree with the bit in highlight, and it certainly suggests the refs are people with very limited experience of playing the game to any sort of reasonable standard. Some of the things they fall for are so obvious to anyone who has, even in real time.

It's ruining the sport - there's 0 honour left in the game, winning at all costs is the only approach these days. It's a shame.

Totally agree. A big bugbare of mine is when players stop suddenly and the player behind has no option but to run into them, automatically being penalised.
Surely the solution is to gave the refs reffing and ex-players on VAR

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View TheBigToePunt's Profile TheBigToePunt Flag 26 Jan 22 1.27pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

Good post. However I must take issue regarding the 2nd goal, it is conclusive. Laws clearly state if play is interfering with play or distracts defender whilst in offside position it is offside. All pundits I have heard say it was offside as Firmino being there caused Mitchell to go towards him rather the Oxlade-Chamberlain. Friend was told immediately there was no reason to rule goal out, he touched his earpiece, so some communication was relayed.

Having just looked at the video again for the first time since the match, I am inclined to come around to your way of thinking on the second goal. Firmino jumps for the ball as high as he can. It doesn't change the fact that Andersen stepped up to Robertson unnecessarily, leaving Guehi and Mitchell 2v3, but does make the absence of any kind of VAR intervention all the more baffling and infuriating.

Also, and as a further addition to my previous rant about our s*** defending for the first Liverpool goal, not only did Schlupp block Andersen from tracking Van Dyke, but Edouard (who had been detailed to occupy the zone in which Van Dyke arrived) literally just walked away from the danger area as soon as the corner was delivered, when he should have been taking a step or two backwards and at least trying to clear it. I have carefully considered the various technical and tactical explanations for his actions, and have concluded that the guy is a total f***ing coward who didn't fancy putting his head in where it hurts.

Perhaps Van Dyke would have scored anyway, but don't just walk away from your f***ing job.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 26 Jan 22 1.41pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

Having just looked at the video again for the first time since the match, I am inclined to come around to your way of thinking on the second goal. Firmino jumps for the ball as high as he can. It doesn't change the fact that Andersen stepped up to Robertson unnecessarily, leaving Guehi and Mitchell 2v3, but does make the absence of any kind of VAR intervention all the more baffling and infuriating.

Also, and as a further addition to my previous rant about our s*** defending for the first Liverpool goal, not only did Schlupp block Andersen from tracking Van Dyke, but Edouard (who had been detailed to occupy the zone in which Van Dyke arrived) literally just walked away from the danger area as soon as the corner was delivered, when he should have been taking a step or two backwards and at least trying to clear it. I have carefully considered the various technical and tactical explanations for his actions, and have concluded that the guy is a total f***ing coward who didn't fancy putting his head in where it hurts.

Perhaps Van Dyke would have scored anyway, but don't just walk away from your f***ing job.

To my ageing eyes, it looked like a Liverpool player blocking off Andersen who might have been designated to pick up Van Dyck and he was able to run from virtually the edge of the area and head in unchallenged.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 6 of 17 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Pawson and Friend apology/dropped