This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
You are on a tear here. He wasn’t asked if he has unqualified approval of everything Putin does. He was asked if he STILL admired him, he lied and said he never said that, and Marr read from the GQ interview where he said he admired him as an operator. This is like debating Sarah Sanders, Teddy. The question was framed so as to make it look as though he’d said he admired Putin which he didn’t. He said he admired him as an operator not as a person.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The question was framed so as to make it look as though he’d said he admired Putin which he didn’t. He said he admired him as an operator not as a person. Exactly, it was a question designed to spread propaganda to dim people. These people complain about their ideological opponents lying all the time but when they do it there is always an excuse.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The question was framed so as to make it look as though he’d said he admired Putin which he didn’t. He said he admired him as an operator not as a person. Ok Sarah. You are acting like the White House press secretary, spinning and twisting a lie. Do you know you are doing it, and is it on purpose? Perhaps you don’t know you are doing it? The question was - “do you still admire Vladimir Putin?” Answer - “No, I’ve never admired Vladimir Putin.” Note: THAT IS A COMPLETE AND UTTER LIE. Marr then states, in an interview, in which he was asked “which current world leader do you most admire?” Farage said “as an operator, but not as a human being, I would say Putin”. He picked Putin out of all world leaders. He could have said anyone, but he chose to state he admired Putin the most of all world leaders. Yet when asked about it, he lied, a bald faced lie, as he did say he admired Putin, and in fact picked Putin out of any world leader, when asked about which world leader he admired. This is a symptom of Trump supporters and Brexit supporters. You will argue that night is day, the sea is green and that black is white. Accept that Farage was caught in a lie, and move on.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Exactly, it was a question designed to spread propaganda to dim people. These people complain about their ideological opponents lying all the time but when they do it there is always an excuse. The brexit party has no manifesto whatsoever. As Marr stated, therefore one must interrogate the creator and leader of the party, to get some kind of clue as to its principles and positions on everything other than brexit. Dim people will vote for the brexit party, not having a single clue what their manifesto is and what their position is on anything except brexit. That is truly dim. Edited by Maine Eagle (13 May 2019 3.26am)
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Ok Sarah. You are acting like the White House press secretary, spinning and twisting a lie. Do you know you are doing it, and is it on purpose? Perhaps you don’t know you are doing it? The question was - “do you still admire Vladimir Putin?” Answer - “No, I’ve never admired Vladimir Putin.” Note: THAT IS A COMPLETE AND UTTER LIE. Marr then states, in an interview, in which he was asked “which current world leader do you most admire?” Farage said “as an operator, but not as a human being, I would say Putin”. He picked Putin out of all world leaders. He could have said anyone, but he chose to state he admired Putin the most of all world leaders. Yet when asked about it, he lied, a bald faced lie, as he did say he admired Putin, and in fact picked Putin out of any world leader, when asked about which world leader he admired. This is a symptom of Trump supporters and Brexit supporters. You will argue that night is day, the sea is green and that black is white. Accept that Farage was caught in a lie, and move on. Yes I know exactly what I’m doing.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
The brexit party has no manifesto whatsoever. As Marr stated, therefore one must interrogate the creator and leader of the party, to get some kind of clue as to its principles and positions on everything other than brexit. Dim people will vote for the brexit party, not having a single clue what their manifesto is and what their position is on anything except brexit. That is truly dim. Edited by Maine Eagle (13 May 2019 3.26am) Isn’t the clue in the name? They are the Brexit party; why do they need a position on anything else?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
The brexit party has no manifesto whatsoever. As Marr stated, therefore one must interrogate the creator and leader of the party, to get some kind of clue as to its principles and positions on everything other than brexit. Dim people will vote for the brexit party, not having a single clue what their manifesto is and what their position is on anything except brexit. That is truly dim. Edited by Maine Eagle (13 May 2019 3.26am) Manifesto? For EU MEP elections? Why are the Brexit party going to be running the EU then? Maine, what are you waffling about, it's obviously a one issue party. I've no issues with Farage being given a hard time by journalists, as long as they are honest actors......The Putin question response was spun by activist journalists. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 May 2019 4.34am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
The brexit party has no manifesto whatsoever. As Marr stated, therefore one must interrogate the creator and leader of the party, to get some kind of clue as to its principles and positions on everything other than brexit. Dim people will vote for the brexit party, not having a single clue what their manifesto is and what their position is on anything except brexit. That is truly dim. Edited by Maine Eagle (13 May 2019 3.26am) Exactly, it's oversimplifying issues and dumbing down to appeal to the half wits and racists Just have Farage's face and call it Brexit. That's enough
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Exactly, it's oversimplifying issues and dumbing down to appeal to the half wits and racists Just have Farage's face and call it Brexit. That's enough I have given you umpteen final warnings but now I've had enough as there are as many Remainers posting here as there are Brexiteers but you are the only one seemingly incapable of posting without personal insults. As you have already admitted you aren't a Palace fan so there are plenty of other fan sites that you can join and insult their members as you are no longer welcome here
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I have given you umpteen final warnings but now I've had enough as there are as many Remainers posting here as there are Brexiteers but you are the only one seemingly incapable of posting without personal insults. As you have already admitted you aren't a Palace fan so there are plenty of other fan sites that you can join and insult their members as you are no longer welcome here You are 100% right in what you say ME.
#Khanout |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
as there are as many Remainers posting here as there are Brexiteers I don't believe that to be remotely true. So far as I can tell the hardline Brexiteers outnumber everyone else, whether a soft Brexiteer, Remainer or any shade in between by a very substantial margin. Don't worry though. Brexiteers are against dictatorship so you could never be accused of that could you?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
So you admit the Remain campaign lied! I hope PP and Steeleye are reading this. As for it being valid, please give it a rest
The referendum had no legal validity. That, whether you believe it or not, is a fact. Laws are made in Parliament and only in Parliament.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
More nonsense. Hreal, Hreal nonsense. The Brexit party has no manifesto whatsoever, so Marr tried to find out about its overlord, Farage. The brexit party is campaigning on a list of 4 bullet points as far as I can see. Stands to reason the leader and creator would be grilled as to his views therefore. Example: Marr : do you still admire Putin. Farage: I never said that. Marr reads from GQ interview where Farage said he admired Putin. Good little example of what a liar Farage is. The Brexit party is about Brexit. It is about a protest against the conspiracy by Parliament to stop it. What manifesto does that require? Are you seriously suggesting that any party manifesto is worth the paper it's written on? Apparently, the BBC only think so when it's to smear Nigel Farage. Why do you waste our time with mealy mouthed disingenuous denials and show support for such disgusting political prejudice from a tax funded organisation? Why do you keep repeating that Farage is a liar when you know that everyone knows that politics is based on lies? Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 May 2019 10.58am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The Brexit party is about Brexit. It is about a protest against the conspiracy by Parliament to stop it. What manifesto does that require? Are you seriously suggesting that any party manifesto is worth the paper it's written on? Apparently, the BBC only think so when it's to smear Nigel Farage. Why do you waste our time with mealy mouthed disingenuous denials and show support for such disgusting political prejudice from a tax funded organisation? Why do you keep repeating that Farage is a liar when you know that everyone knows that politics is based on lies? Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 May 2019 10.58am) It does raise the question of which politicians can be regarded as honest in any meaningful way - or are some simply less dishonest than others?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
It does raise the question of which politicians can be regarded as honest in any meaningful way - or are some simply less dishonest than others? Politics is not about being honest. It can't be. It should be clear as to why to anyone reading these boards. Many people can't handle the truth. They make their own truth to satisfy whatever belief system they adopt. I'd say that Farage was as open in that interview as he could be. Marr laid traps for him and he avoided them with clear answers. It was a hatchet job and Farage knew that.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The referendum had no legal validity. That, whether you believe it or not, is a fact. Laws are made in Parliament and only in Parliament. In Your post I replied to, you stated " add the lies from the remain side" In case you forgot it was at 8.44pm yesterday.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't believe that to be remotely true. So far as I can tell the hardline Brexiteers outnumber everyone else, whether a soft Brexiteer, Remainer or any shade in between by a very substantial margin. Don't worry though. Brexiteers are against dictatorship so you could never be accused of that could you? I don't think you can accuse ME of being a dictator. There are rules to adhere to when posting on here. PP pushed these to the limit on several occasions but continued to insult other posters.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Isn’t the clue in the name? They are the Brexit party; why do they need a position on anything else? Because despite what Farage would shove down your throat the world doesn't revolve solely around Brexit. If you accept there is a chance Brexit will be scrapped, then you will need MEPs to tread a careful path and you need to know what their positions are on other topics. Marr was simply trying to dig into that but Farage doesnt have a manifesto or clue how to lead, beyond Brexit.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
| W12 13 May 19 3.44pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Because despite what Farage would shove down your throat the world doesn't revolve solely around Brexit. If you accept there is a chance Brexit will be scrapped, then you will need MEPs to tread a careful path and you need to know what their positions are on other topics. Marr was simply trying to dig into that but Farage doesnt have a manifesto or clue how to lead, beyond Brexit. If Brexit is "scrapped" then nothing else will matter anyway because of the permanent damage to UK democracy (effectively destroyed) and what the EU clearly have in store for us which we will have no future say on. People who voted for Brexit understand this and I think it's what drives much of the anger. There is no reason for Farage to have any wider manifesto at this point. It's clearly a single and binary issue vote.
|
|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.