This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Well that was easy, next please. One of the benefits of not being in a bloc of 28 nations is that you have less competing interests to worry about. We are the 5/6th largest economy in the world so other countries will want to trade with us. The stumbling bloc is when they want free access to a sector that we want to protect. As we are now on our own we don't have to worry about farmers in the rest of Europe who produce crops we don't as an example. Edited by Badger11 (10 Jun 2019 7.39am)
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Well that was easy, next please. Looking forward to all those cheap dog burgers- yum yum!
|
|
|
This drop is all May's fault. BBC News - Fall in car production hits UK growth
|
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
This drop is all May's fault. BBC News - Fall in car production hits UK growth This is old news and little to do with Mrs May tbf.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
This is old news and little to do with Mrs May tbf. Agreed I have heard loads of car industry experts on this. China was the big growth market and that has slowed down big time. The rest of the world like the UK is now saying stop producing petrol and diesel cars. It's possibility happened a little too quick because the manufacturers are not yet ready to switch en masse to electric and the infrastructure in the UK is lagging. The hybrid car was initially seen as the stop gap solution but the public aren't buying into that. So over production plus buyer uncertainty are the issues. The solution is that the car manufacturers all need the same battery technology so rather than invest separately with money they don't have they are better off either merging or pooling their efforts with joint technology projects. Meanwhile it would help them if the UK government spent more on infrastructure and possibly offered an incentive to motorists to switch to the new technology.
One more point |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Agreed I have heard loads of car industry experts on this. China was the big growth market and that has slowed down big time. The rest of the world like the UK is now saying stop producing petrol and diesel cars. It's possibility happened a little too quick because the manufacturers are not yet ready to switch en masse to electric and the infrastructure in the UK is lagging. The hybrid car was initially seen as the stop gap solution but the public aren't buying into that. So over production plus buyer uncertainty are the issues. The solution is that the car manufacturers all need the same battery technology so rather than invest separately with money they don't have they are better off either merging or pooling their efforts with joint technology projects. Meanwhile it would help them if the UK government spent more on infrastructure and possibly offered an incentive to motorists to switch to the new technology. Yeah, some of the slowdown can be attributed to the 'fuel debate' but realistically most people are already living beyond their means and are just no longer in a position to keep fuelling this current bubble with further debt..............hence the global slowdown (most sectors) for the past year or so. Worrying times ahead.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
This is old news and little to do with Mrs May tbf. Yes and no. One of the major reasons for the slowdown is the government's message that diesel is bad which just isn't true. I drive a modern diesel with a Euro6 engine which is probably cleaner than most petrol engines but because the government haven't acknowledged this it means that manufacturers whose range is mainly diesel ( Jaguar and Land Rover ) are suffering. Plug in Hybrids aren't selling because the government has withdrawn their grants and people aren't willing to pay the extra for a hybrid
|
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Meanwhile it would help them if the UK government spent more on infrastructure and possibly offered an incentive to motorists to switch to the new technology. They did offer grants for people buying plug in hybrids but recently withdrew them so people stopped buying. As an example a BMW 5 series costs £38,000 for the most basic 2 litre petrol engine but the hybrid version costs another £9,000
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Yes and no. One of the major reasons for the slowdown is the government's message that diesel is bad which just isn't true. I drive a modern diesel with a Euro6 engine which is probably cleaner than most petrol engines but because the government haven't acknowledged this it means that manufacturers whose range is mainly diesel ( Jaguar and Land Rover ) are suffering. Plug in Hybrids aren't selling because the government has withdrawn their grants and people aren't willing to pay the extra for a hybrid Surely it is the particulates in diesel that make it harmful because of the harm they can do to the cardiovascular system.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Surely it is the particulates in diesel that make it harmful because of the harm they can do to the cardiovascular system. Euro6 engines remove most if not all of the particulates with a mixture of a particulate filter plus the AdBlue that converts the harmful NOx exhaust gases into harmless nitrogen and water
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Euro6 engines remove most if not all of the particulates with a mixture of a particulate filter plus the AdBlue that converts the harmful NOx exhaust gases into harmless nitrogen and water I was not aware of this.
|
|
|
My lorry at work is a euro 6,and we fill up with diesel and have a separate tank for ad blue.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
|
May properly f***ed this country What the hell has she been doing?
|
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
May properly f***ed this country What the hell has she been doing? You have to have a screw loose to think no deal is not a huge disaster in waiting. People who think a "WTO" exit is a good idea are 1 - in a big minority and 2 - in cloud cuckoo land. For May the writing was on the wall long ago that a no deal exit would not get through parliament, and I honestly think she didnt want to be the PM that shot the country in the foot and triggered the worst recession in recent memory. Trying to run a negotiation with a threat of a mutually unpleasant outcome, which everyone knows is highly unlikely, to try to force your own agenda is not so easy. I am not saying Theresa May didnt f*** up virtually every major decision, but dont listen to Farage when he makes it sound like concluding a WA with the EU is a piece of piss and he could have done so much better. He has burned all bridges long ago in the EU. You cannot secure good outcomes with people you have existing bad relationships with, it just doesnt work that way. Dangling no deal could be moot soon, if a cross party group of MPs get their way, as they will legally block any possible method of no deal (prorogue etc). Many MPs are quite seriously afraid of a new tory leader trying to force no deal through, so they want to stop that at all costs. Keeping it on the table as a negotiation point is secondary to that concern.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
You have to have a screw loose to think no deal is not a huge disaster in waiting. People who think a "WTO" exit is a good idea are 1 - in a big minority and 2 - in cloud cuckoo land. For May the writing was on the wall long ago that a no deal exit would not get through parliament, and I honestly think she didnt want to be the PM that shot the country in the foot and triggered the worst recession in recent memory. Trying to run a negotiation with a threat of a mutually unpleasant outcome, which everyone knows is highly unlikely, to try to force your own agenda is not so easy. I am not saying Theresa May didnt f*** up virtually every major decision, but dont listen to Farage when he makes it sound like concluding a WA with the EU is a piece of piss and he could have done so much better. He has burned all bridges long ago in the EU. You cannot secure good outcomes with people you have existing bad relationships with, it just doesnt work that way. Dangling no deal could be moot soon, if a cross party group of MPs get their way, as they will legally block any possible method of no deal (prorogue etc). Many MPs are quite seriously afraid of a new tory leader trying to force no deal through, so they want to stop that at all costs. Keeping it on the table as a negotiation point is secondary to that concern. Presumably this is your opinion. If fact, please supply a link.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Presumably this is your opinion. If fact, please supply a link. The part about WTO, ie a hard Brexit, is correct. Polling at the time of the vote and various data since details the fragmentation of the leave vote vs the singularity of the remain vote. Leave means many things to different people and represented many different reasons for voting out - one of which was hard (wto) the others a Norway or Canada style deal etc. This puts the hard Brexit crowd in the minority against the rest of the reasons for voting either leave or remain. This is old ground. When I get a chance I’ll dig out a few references for you but we have been here before. Not everyone that voted leave wanted a hard Brexit, and it incenses me when people claim that it did. It’s even more infuriating when they go so far as to say it represented a majority within the leave vote, and for some reason talk like their reason for voting leave is the same as everyone else that also voted leave. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, it’s utter bollocks.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
The part about WTO, ie a hard Brexit, is correct. Polling at the time of the vote and various data since details the fragmentation of the leave vote vs the singularity of the remain vote. Leave means many things to different people and represented many different reasons for voting out - one of which was hard (wto) the others a Norway or Canada style deal etc. This puts the hard Brexit crowd in the minority against the rest of the reasons for voting either leave or remain. This is old ground. When I get a chance I’ll dig out a few references for you but we have been here before. Not everyone that voted leave wanted a hard Brexit, and it incenses me when people claim that it did. It’s even more infuriating when they go so far as to say it represented a majority within the leave vote, and for some reason talk like their reason for voting leave is the same as everyone else that also voted leave. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, it’s utter bollocks. What isn't though is that through bad or worse we voted 52% to 48% to leave
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
What isn't though is that through bad or worse we voted 52% to 48% to leave Christ. Cheers for the truism. Not what we’re talking about though is it. We are talking about the validity of the claim that the no deal split of the leave vote is a minority or not. Not whether we should or should not leave.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.