This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by cryrst
I doubt whether Wissy will like that as it will rule him out
|
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Okay but the Electoral Commission has previously ruled out this type of multiple choice question as too confusing. As they approve the "question" my understanding is that it will have to binary. Now bearing in mind that people complained about the binary question asked in 2016 I think you can multiple those complaints for this type of question. What happens if someone votes Remain and No Deal. I get your frustration it's messy which is why we are where we are today. Edited by Badger11 (02 Sep 2019 3.44pm) There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
|
Originally posted by mezzer
There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by furrybloke
Why not have it on the ballot if you don't like the deal or no deal you can change your mind 3 choices make the argument for or against each. Why is remain not an option? They lost but if the deal on offer or no deal is not what you want regardless of how you voted why not give people the option. FPTP obviously cannot guarantee that, even if it were true. I think he’d go to leave with giving everything away. Stay in the customs union, open door policy, roll on the floor and have his tummy tickled after promising to leave with a sensitive voice and ear to a political union that wants to stuff us and tear our sphincters open. He’d probably agree to that in Brussels as well seeing as he’s weak and shows no loyalty to his nation, pretty much like all the hysteria going on by the whingeing minority Get on with it Boris and backhand these clowns for good so we can get on with what we want.
COYP |
|
| Invalid user 2019 |
|
|---|---|
|
Another one? [Link] If it's coming before long it would appear to be the best time to do so for the Tories. There's also a decent chance of it being set, or moved, to the day after Brexit to snuff out the Brexit Party vote. Interesting times. Edited by dollardays (02 Sep 2019 6.00pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Johnson does not call for a GE however within his speech it hints that if he loses tomorrow he will call for a GE. "There is no circumstance in which I will ask for an extension" I think he is preparing the ground to blame the opposition if we go to a GE. Get your popcorn out.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
But the government promised a referendum, gave a referendum and PROMISED to honour the result of the referendum, yet you and many others are doing their utmost to overturn the result...will you also query the result of a general election IF you dont gert the result you want? Corbyn fan are you?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I doubt whether Wissy will like that as it will rule him out GOOD!
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I doubt whether Wissy will like that as it will rule him out He didnt vote last time anyway.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
To try to counter the effect of Farage and the promise made by Cameron of course I did. That though doesn't mean I approved of it being held. I thoroughly disapproved and was very vocal about that at the time. However it was held and it would have been foolish in the extreme to allow those who believed the garbage thrown out by the Leave campaigns to just have a walk over. He did answer.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What's your point? That it hasn't yet found the way doesn't mean it cannot and it certainly doesn't mean it will allow itself to be sidelined. It will do what is necessary. You said that it is the will of the current Parliament that they do not want us to leave the EU without first agreeing a deal. I'm making the point is that they've had three goes and failed each time. Maybe withdrawing the whip will focus minds, but I think Parliament has been pretty useless.
|
|
|
If it had been David Cameron instead of BJ I'd say he was being pig headed.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
|
Originally posted by johnno42000
If it had been David Cameron instead of BJ I'd say he was being pig headed. Nah, he’s got his trotters up. (Danny Dyer) Funny actually.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
But the government promised a referendum, gave a referendum and PROMISED to honour the result of the referendum, yet you and many others are doing their utmost to overturn the result...will you also query the result of a general election IF you dont gert the result you want? Corbyn fan are you? No one was offered an exit without first agreeing a new arrangement. Parliament is not seeking to do anything other than insist that they have the final say over the terms of our exit. There is a fundamental principle of our democracy at stake here. Parliament and not the executive are sovereign. I have as much time for Corbyn as I do for Johnson. Which is none at all.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.