This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Of course I am not always right! No-one is. I am though right sometimes and I am on this matter. Not just a little bit right. 100% factually right. However, as people are quite rightly really tired of your nonsense and my efforts to correct you, which have so obviously failed, I will leave it there and let you wallow alone in your self made mess if you really cannot stop. Surely the question of right or wrong needs to be decided by our representatives. We cannot be entrusted to decide for ourselves.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It's no battle! It's a walkover of truth v lies but the defeated refuses to lie down. This isn't 52 v 48 it's 100 v 0. Rather like the remainers, yes?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Interesting article by BBC. Harriet Harman wants to be Speaker but her local party is not happy. I have no idea if she will get the votes but my sympathy is with her constituency voters. I find the idea that someone like Harman can be a neutral speaker as almost comical. The tenure of Bercow has truly damaged this position and we need someone who truly respects the role to be handed it....not another narcissist who still wants to be involved.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Of course I am not always right! No-one is. I am though right sometimes and I am on this matter. Not just a little bit right. 100% factually right. However, as people are quite rightly really tired of your nonsense and my efforts to correct you, which have so obviously failed, I will leave it there and let you wallow alone in your self made mess if you really cannot stop. Your correction as you call it is wrong. I did say in answer to your original question that Gina Miller was originally funded by money she did receive from the group Soros paid into and now gets funded from begging from the public. NOTE: [Link] You are the one in the wrong.
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
| W12 20 Sep 19 5.34pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Brexit Party MEPs abstain from vote calling for release of detained British citizen in Iran. Brexit 'patriots' fail to support an imprisoned British citizen. Unlike the rest of the EU parliament. Whatever are they doing there anyway, just there to disrupt as much as they can while coining in the money. “One of the party's MEP's, Belinda de Lucy, told the Parliament, sitting in Strasbourg, that it was 'sanctions' not 'words' that were needed now. 'As Iran grows bolder in its provocations, it appears the Eu's deal with Iran is failing in its objectives. Even it's most important signatory, the USA, has pulled out,' she said. 'British citizens are the subject of kidnapping, solitary confinement, and barbarity. 'Our citizens have become pawns in this geopolitical game, and yet the EU remains the biggest global champion of the Iran nuclear deal with cynical commercial undertones” Did you ever work for the BBC?
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Brexit Party MEPs abstain from vote calling for release of detained British citizen in Iran. Brexit 'patriots' fail to support an imprisoned British citizen. Unlike the rest of the EU parliament. Whatever are they doing there anyway, just there to disrupt as much as they can while coining in the money. Aren't they 'married in' British?.....so actually an example of 'passport' British. I would have to know far more about the case before I could judge on it personally. As for the Brexit party being disruptive.....errrr? That's why people voted for them.....and they can 'coin' as much as the other MEPs there until we leave.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Surely the question of right or wrong needs to be decided by our representatives. We cannot be entrusted to decide for ourselves. On questions of opinion, yes. On questions of fact, no. Truth is truth. Facts are fact. Lies are lies. There is only one opinion on such matters.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Rather like the remainers, yes? If you read what I wrote then you will understand why it's not. The Brexit referendum produced an almost equal split result between two opinions. This matter concerns what is 100% true, as confirmed by the links he referenced, and the untrue claims he made which I repeated to him in his own words. This was never a matter of opinion. All of this is quite obviously of no importance whatsoever in the bigger scheme of things and, although I don't remember ever saying so before, I guess sometimes the result is more important than the way it is achieved. Nevertheless blatant lies need to be called out. Isn't the expression that a lie can be halfway around the world before the truth has got it's boots on?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Its not just 60,000 a year though....its 79,000 + unlimited expenses (with no reciepts required) + subsidised bars restaurants + mortgages paid, long holidays + etc etc...so somewhat more than 60k a year Edited by the silurian (20 Sep 2019 8.57am) You get thick MP's like her because it's not worth it. Compare it to a CEO's wage and its pants.
|
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
Your correction as you call it is wrong. I did say in answer to your original question that Gina Miller was originally funded by money she did receive from the group Soros paid into and now gets funded from begging from the public. NOTE: [Link] You are the one in the wrong. I said I would leave you to wallow in your own mess and after this I really hope I can, What you say above is yet another lie. It's NOT what you said. You said Soros funded it personally. See my post at 11.10 this morning which quotes your own words. That wasn't the link you used either. The one you did use was from an earlier article which confirmed what I told you. That the funds to "Best for Britain" came from a Soros funded foundation. There is no evidence that "Best for Britain" help fund any of the Court cases, which have all been crowd funded. "Begging" is just Express hyperbole. As I have suggested many times I really think it would be wise for you to stop digging your hole.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
You get thick MP's like her because it's not worth it. Compare it to a CEO's wage and its pants. Maybe it is pants, BUT nobody forces them to be MPs do they...so why do it if it so s***e...must be a reason...wonder what that could be....unlimited expenses to clean your duckpond perhaps??
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If you read what I wrote then you will understand why it's not. The Brexit referendum produced an almost equal split result between two opinions. This matter concerns what is 100% true, as confirmed by the links he referenced, and the untrue claims he made which I repeated to him in his own words. This was never a matter of opinion. All of this is quite obviously of no importance whatsoever in the bigger scheme of things and, although I don't remember ever saying so before, I guess sometimes the result is more important than the way it is achieved. Nevertheless blatant lies need to be called out. Isn't the expression that a lie can be halfway around the world before the truth has got it's boots on? zzzzzzzzzzzzz!! Go out tomorrow and get yourself a sense of humour pal!
|
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
zzzzzzzzzzzzz!! Go out tomorrow and get yourself a sense of humour pal! If you think what you said was funny then don't change your day job to become a comedian. My sense of humour is perfectly fine. I just don't find much to laugh about here. Much more here makes me feel very sad at how so many know so little about our democracy and how it works. It's all very sad.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It wouldn't be the first time as he can be a bit of an escape artist when he has a mind to be, but no, not this time. We're back now but will be out again later as it's a great day here and too good to miss.
Tbh wissy.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
On questions of opinion, yes. On questions of fact, no. Truth is truth. Facts are fact. Lies are lies. There is only one opinion on such matters. A lot of philosophical work has been done on things like this and it is far more complicated than that. But don't worry too much; I won't bore everyone with the debate. But, off the top of my head, Plato's treatise on truths is probably the starting point.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If you think what you said was funny then don't change your day job to become a comedian. My sense of humour is perfectly fine. I just don't find much to laugh about here. Much more here makes me feel very sad at how so many know so little about our democracy and how it works. It's all very sad. err, I didnt say anything you boring supercilious old fart. Youre just boring everyone on here to death with your 'Im superior to you' attitude and your attempts at using big words to belittle anyone who disagrees with you....so carry on pal Im bored with you now.....
|
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
A lot of philosophical work has been done on things like this and it is far more complicated than that. But don't worry too much; I won't bore everyone with the debate. But, off the top of my head, Plato's treatise on truths is probably the starting point. I guess another might be that there is a difference of opinion on what "leave" actually meant!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.