You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Pathetic
June 1 2024 9.17am

Pathetic

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 13 of 19 < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 >

 

Park Road Flag 04 Nov 17 4.29pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

[Link]

Granted they have less of an issue now and Islamist terrorism is unheard of. Of course, if you went back to the 70s to early 2000, Japan had massive problems with domestic terrorism whilst the UK had no problems with Islamist terrorism.

Also I think in 2002 there was a murder of an MP for political reasons.



Some of those groups sound like they came from the script of their version of "life of Brian/Buhda"

And on a more serious note. No, we didn't have a problem with Islamist terrorism, we had a problem with Catholic/Protestant terrorism.

My original post asked the question is it coincidence that because of their immigration policy that they have had no Islamic terrorism.

I think so.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 04 Nov 17 4.54pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by Park Road


Some of those groups sound like they came from the script of their version of "life of Brian/Buhda"

And on a more serious note. No, we didn't have a problem with Islamist terrorism, we had a problem with Catholic/Protestant terrorism.

My original post asked the question is it coincidence that because of their immigration policy that they have had no Islamic terrorism.

I think so.

Yes, I agree. It probably is a coincidence. 80% of countries around the globe are still, thankfully, virgins when it comes any terror attack related to IS/
Al Qaeda and the rest even though nearly all of them have some sort of Muslim presence.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View johnno42000's Profile johnno42000 Flag 04 Nov 17 5.28pm Send a Private Message to johnno42000 Add johnno42000 as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

Because if we cannot provide homes for the children in care now,how are we suddenly going to find homes for 3000 extra.
If you read my post I think we should help as much as we can ...but not at cost to the 1000s of children who seek safety from abusive parents/careers here.

The point I was making was that these children would be far better off in our care system than living in a camp. I'm not saying they should replace children that are already here just that they should be added to the the 65,000 and the normal rules for placements etc should be followed. Those 3,000 then become'our' children just like the 65,000 that are already here.

 


'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 04 Nov 17 5.29pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by johnno42000

The point I was making was that these children would be far better off in our care system than living in a camp. I'm not saying they should replace children that are already here just that they should be added to the the 65,000 and the normal rules for placements etc should be followed. Those 3,000 then become'our' children just like the 65,000 that are already here.

Fair point.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Nov 17 5.42pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

There are people on here don't want same sex couples to adopt.

Who?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 04 Nov 17 5.52pm

Can't remember. Was on a thread about a kid being killed by one of his 2 dad's.
If I remember rightly the op (not making any names) alluded that it was coz they were gay that the child was killed.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Park Road Flag 04 Nov 17 6.03pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

Yes, I agree. It probably is a coincidence. 80% of countries around the globe are still, thankfully, virgins when it comes any terror attack related to IS/
Al Qaeda and the rest even though nearly all of them have some sort of Muslim presence.

Interesting choice of adverb there kerms. I would have opted for definitely not probably.
But at least we are in agreement.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Nov 17 6.05pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Can't remember. Was on a thread about a kid being killed by one of his 2 dad's.
If I remember rightly the op (not making any names) alluded that it was coz they were gay that the child was killed.

That's not actually what you said. it also has nothing to do with refugees of course.

In the end, this a question of what is best for Britain. The government has a duty to British citizens first. We can argue about what is best, but we can't be lead by emotionalism. I hate children suffering but I see it every day on my TV. It has become commonplace.

I seriously wonder if saving people from famine or war zones will actually result in less suffering or more in the long term. I can ask that question in the cold light of day because I am remote from these people.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Online Flag Croydon 04 Nov 17 6.25pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

Fair point.

Why are you assuming that child refugees go into the care system at all?

There are plenty of UK families who would take in and be responsible for them.

They are wanted.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Nov 17 6.28pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Why are you assuming that child refugees go into the care system at all?

There are plenty of UK families who would take in and be responsible for them.

They are wanted.


There is already a shortage of families for existing kids in care. Why make it worse or adopt refugees at the expense of British kids?
I can't justify that.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 04 Nov 17 6.42pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Why are you assuming that child refugees go into the care system at all?

There are plenty of UK families who would take in and be responsible for them.

They are wanted.

I wasn't, my point is that there 1000s of children here waiting to be adopted....whats your point?

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 04 Nov 17 6.48pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

There are people on here don't want same sex couples to adopt.

False equivalence.
They aren't in a position to decide upon adoption law.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 13 of 19 < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Pathetic