There is still an option for the UK to stay in and negotiate its concerns, it may be a better time than when Cameron tried it.

Article 50 would have to be cancelled, the EU cannot stop this.

That would keep the UK at the top table, undeservedly so and importantly with its veto intact.

Then off to the Brussels boozer with all our old mates.

And endless jokes about Spurs....

It would have happened already if Johnson and his ERG mob hadn't kept voting against the deal his own party had got.

Yes but the problem is the 16.1 million 'losers' who voted Remain. Did you think they would roll over so easily. The discussions, negotiations, debate, bickering in Parliament has been pretty representative of the vote. I don't believe anyone truely knew what we were voting for otherwise we wouldn't be in such a mess.

We will most likely have another delay. Then leave. With a deal. That no one really wants. Everyone will still be complaining. A few people will get richer and a few people will get poorer.

As you keep telling everyone ad nausea he's doesn't have to do what 'we' want...they do what they think is best for the country (and themselves). You cant have it BOTH ways!

Edited by Lyons550 (04 Oct 2019 3.28pm)

The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

As they say "where there's a will there's a way" and that is the problem as neither the EU nor the remainers in parliament have the will to let this country carry out the will of the majority and between them they have brought the UK to where it is today

Because it clearly wasn’t Brexit

And so this thread, like Parliament, goes around in circles.

No it isn't. It consists of you, I and everybody else.

The only place it is judged is in Parliament by their duly elected representatives.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I wondered who would make the "whatabout" response.

No it didn't but that's because it wasn't trying to analyse the "remain" campaign, which was weak and often playing catch up. Trying to counter the kind of wild claims made by the "leave" campaign produced some equally wild responses. None were what were needed. Whether they balanced each other is a matter of opinion but as this was no way to try to take such a serious decision the point that the referendum was a total failure is well made.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Of course. He is as entitled as any other MP to decide what he believes is best.

But he cannot act alone, or in concert with a few others.

It's the collective will of Parliament as a whole which counts.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Tommy robinson!