This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Do I need to jamie? You're a moderator and reading the same stuff I am! To Painter's credit, he has not retaliated in kind. This site will descend into chaos if we allow posters to continually abuse others by calling them w@nkers because their views and opinions don't reconcile with their own surely? I generally only respond to moderator alerts. That way its someone being genuinely offended, not by own personal views and bias.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Hoof Hearted 22 Mar 17 11.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I generally only respond to moderator alerts. That way its someone being genuinely offended, not by own personal views and bias. Fair enough. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt as Painter hasn't complained about it.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Anyway... never mind about calling people Scum.... Since when did it become acceptable on here to continually call another poster a W@nker and get away with it? Clearly Pista has been yellow carded before participating in this thread and has called Painted the W word on numerous occasions without rebuke from a moderator. I have been carded for usage of that phrase and kept my head down for a month.... this bloke seems to be able to get away with it.... Oooh calling for a card - must be a cardable offence. Book him ref! (Oh sh1t and me!)
You fed me, you bred me, I'll remember your name. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Hoof Hearted 22 Mar 17 11.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pikester
Oooh calling for a card - must be a cardable offence. Book him ref! (Oh sh1t and me!) Pikey..... This thread is bonkers.... people abusing people for abusing people....
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
hedgehog50 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Well the statement didn't describe him as white scum, straight scum or Christian scum. As such its not discriminatory. He could arguably have claimed that it was racist, sexist, religious sectarianism etc, but he'd need to demonstrate that was the case. His options would thus be slander or libel should he seek redress. Bunny La Roche herself can be racist when it suits her. She was a leading light in the International Socialist Network [splinter group from the Socialist Workers Party - oh how the comrades do fall out]. However, the ISN itself almost was immediately riven by dissent. Much of this centred on a row about a sexual practise known as 'Race Play', in which partners of different ethnicity ignore social conventions and - basically - call the black one the 'n word' while having sexual relations. You would have thought that life doesn't really get more racist if not white supremacist than that. The main proponent of this rather bizarre, counter-revolutionary activity was Richard Seymour, the 'leader' of ISN and a close ally of Bunny LaRoche. Bunny has stood by her man - one wonders what he called her if they had any close encounters.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This thread has gone better than I expected. I'm looking forward to the fighting following the weekend report
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle
This thread has gone better than I expected. I'm looking forward to the fighting following the weekend report ...from your hospital bed. Best of British S_E. ....For Harry, England and Saint George. "we'll meet again..."
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Bunny La Roche herself can be racist when it suits her. She was a leading light in the International Socialist Network [splinter group from the Socialist Workers Party - oh how the comrades do fall out]. However, the ISN itself almost was immediately riven by dissent. Much of this centred on a row about a sexual practise known as 'Race Play', in which partners of different ethnicity ignore social conventions and - basically - call the black one the 'n word' while having sexual relations. You would have thought that life doesn't really get more racist if not white supremacist than that. The main proponent of this rather bizarre, counter-revolutionary activity was Richard Seymour, the 'leader' of ISN and a close ally of Bunny LaRoche. Bunny has stood by her man - one wonders what he called her if they had any close encounters. Burning crosses on peoples lawns? What people do in private isn't affected by such laws, and if its by consent, then there is no actus rae, no matter how bizarre it may seem.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Pikester
Oooh calling for a card - must be a cardable offence. Book him ref! (Oh sh1t and me!) Off off off off off....
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
hedgehog50 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
What people do in private isn't affected by such laws, and if its by consent, then there is no actus rae, no matter how bizarre it may seem. Why bring Islamic extremism into this? Edited by hedgehog50 (22 Mar 2017 1.05pm)
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
woooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaah This thread has gone way off topic... maybe HOL'ers could post pictures of the crappiest hotels they have ever stayed in instead. Much more interesting and to the point.
Glad All Over |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Why bring Islamic extremism into this? Edited by hedgehog50 (22 Mar 2017 1.05pm) Not really, Actus Reus is a central concept in western law. It's a bit like applying common sense in law, you'd like it. Actus Reus and Mens Rae are both required for a criminal offence, otherwise there is no offence.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.