This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Edited by bexleydave (22 Jun 2018 6.18am)
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
|
Interesting article in a paper / blog that I've never heard of where they claim that the delay in issuing the accounts was put down to changes in the way its accountants wanted to show internal, inter-company loans. If true I'm guessing that the auditors got their own way otherwise they wouldn't have signed off the accounts but I'm interested to know what version one was. I believe that there was a mistake in the analysis in the bit covering Parish's salary where they state:- The accounts do not reveal the name of the club’s highest paid director – it is assumed to be Parish – but it does show that they were paid £2,150,000, which is the fourth highest director remuneration in English football. Only Tottenham, Arsenal and Manchester United pay any of their directors more. Palace’s unnamed director also qualified for a contractual bonus in this financial year, though this amount was waived and reinvested in the club. I haven't rechecked the accounts but I'm sure that the £2.15m was the total fees / salary voted to Parish and I'm sure that this excessive amount which was subsequently ploughed back into the club was down to an accounting exercise rather than a lining of the back pocket. The article is here [Link]
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Interesting article in a paper / blog that I've never heard of where they claim that the delay in issuing the accounts was put down to changes in the way its accountants wanted to show internal, inter-company loans. If true I'm guessing that the auditors got their own way otherwise they wouldn't have signed off the accounts but I'm interested to know what version one was. I believe that there was a mistake in the analysis in the bit covering Parish's salary where they state:- The accounts do not reveal the name of the club’s highest paid director – it is assumed to be Parish – but it does show that they were paid £2,150,000, which is the fourth highest director remuneration in English football. Only Tottenham, Arsenal and Manchester United pay any of their directors more. Palace’s unnamed director also qualified for a contractual bonus in this financial year, though this amount was waived and reinvested in the club. I haven't rechecked the accounts but I'm sure that the £2.15m was the total fees / salary voted to Parish and I'm sure that this excessive amount which was subsequently ploughed back into the club was down to an accounting exercise rather than a lining of the back pocket. The article is here [Link]
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
|
Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig
My view is that the issue was due diligence that the 3m retained deposit was a genuine third-party transaction but -- i suspect like inside croydon -- i have no inside track on that. it's just the most likely scenario my small brain can think of. I'm not so sure as that is the sort of thing that is normally sorted out with a meeting lasting no more than one hour. The two options for treatment are 1) taking it into income which increases profits and 2) putting it in creditors as an item that is possibly to be paid back, which wouldn't affect profits. Without any inside knowledge whatsoever I do think that intercompany transactions are more likely to be at the root of the delay otherwise why have such a convoluted shareholding structure
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I'm not so sure as that is the sort of thing that is normally sorted out with a meeting lasting no more than one hour. The two options for treatment are 1) taking it into income which increases profits and 2) putting it in creditors as an item that is possibly to be paid back, which wouldn't affect profits. Without any inside knowledge whatsoever I do think that intercompany transactions are more likely to be at the root of the delay otherwise why have such a convoluted shareholding structure fair dues
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
|
Shall we just all agree that we haven’t got a scooby what happened.
|
|
|
CPFC2010 have just two days left to file the 2018 accounts otherwise it all kicks off once again
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Here we go again. It's a sad state of affairs that a company like Palace can't fulfil it's statutory duties to file their accounts on time when larger and more complicated companies can manage it They're currently with a 3* Michelin chef, before being passed on to a fully qualified masseuse
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
|
Originally posted by robdave2k
Due to the size of the company they have to go in by post, so it’s possible they have been received For example last year’s were received by Companies House on15/6, but not put on the register until the 19/6. And just after the company got a warning it would be struck off, the company dissolved and Wilf and co belong to the crown.
|
|
|
Originally posted by bexleydave
They're currently with a 3* Michelin chef, before being passed on to a fully qualified masseuse Then the accounts will be shredded and sent to David Hockney, who will construct the most fanciful of paper mache sculptures.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
Then the accounts will be shredded and sent to David Hockney, who will construct the most fanciful of paper mache sculptures.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
|
does recidivism matter with this sort of thing?
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
|
Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig
does recidivism matter with this sort of thing? it looks like it
|
|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
Then the accounts will be shredded and sent to David Hockney, who will construct the most fanciful of paper mache sculptures. Hmmmm, a Banksy/Hockney collaboration - could be interesting
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
|
Originally posted by becky
Hmmmm, a Banksy/Hockney collaboration - could be interesting It's going to be called "A Bigger Shred".
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
And just after the company got a warning it would be struck off, the company dissolved and Wilf and co belong to the crown. There was sold all chance of them being struck off. Any creditor could have objected, Parish, other clubs, HMRC etc
|
|
|
Originally posted by robdave2k
Any creditor could have objected, Parish, other clubs, HMRC etc I spot a sense of humour bypass. You wouldn't happen to be a Chartered Accountant by any chance
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.