This is what tires me. I already said I don't call anyone interested in changing anything 'outraged idiots'. This is you twisting text. Just stop it. I said go and change it if you are outraged.

This woman has not broken any laws.
Many might not like the law but it is what it is.
Let's have a list of everyone who enjoys this benefit and I have no doubt that the Left will be surprised who is on that list.
It is a s*** law that needs changing and maybe the tax office might be better employed doing that than starting an investigation into my Stepson who earns probably £15k/year and is scrupulously honest about it.
Politicians are generally corrupt and out for themselves and their officials are generally plain useless!

"Any remittance that she pays is likely more than the average outraged idiot pays."

Here you called tax payers who question the ethics of the issues at hand idiots

The wording is there. I haven't mentioned taxpayers. You have.

"If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed."

Here you call those who would like to change things outraged idiots

If they were assembled outside Parliament protesting I wouldn't be calling them outraged idiots. But they're not. They're outraged here, which is not going to change a thing.

"Life's not fair, but neither are humans. .. Start a movement. Get all your toddler mates to help."

As above, essentially.

You post this quote, but have nothing to say. Why bother? Stop waving flags. Do something if you are so incensed by it.

"I didn't "call anyone interested in changing anything 'outraged idiots'". I advised the idiots to change the things they are outraged about. "

I've leave others to try to get to the bottom of what this means

If you cant't understand this, then I have attributed more intelligence to you than you merit. Would you like me to explain these simple words?

"I have noticed, as you have seen by my 'sig', these indiscresions before. You have no idea what I have done to get some of these stupid laws changed. But you might also notice that my methods are not for everyone."

You've gone from being angry at, and repeatedly insulted people on account of taking issue with ethics and wanting to make change (even if law wasn't broken), to, on account of me pointing out your signature about being 'dragged down by lawmakers' acknowledging yourself that it's perfectly fine to take issue with ('stupid') laws . Aka considering ethics, not only law. You stances habitually contradict what you've previously said, even in the same conversation. Perplexing. Last post on this as it's like arguing with a mean spirited random answer generator and going nowhere I'm afraid.

Edited by BlueJay (15 Apr 2022 1.41am)

The attempt to dial it down after spending the thread calling people outraged idiots and toddlers. Yes, you were a real picture of calm just 'not seeing it from others point of view'. Okay fine. Let's go with that. Good enough?

Okay idiot .

So you asked me to point out where you've been angry (i've already done that on this page). Your new stance is to say that calling someone an idiot doesn't mean you're angry, yet when I then do so with a smile you are clearly offended and call me 'stupid'. How wise. Go to bed.

I commented on the state of our politics landscape and 'us and them' nature of the system and problems with that. If anyone found themselves disturbed or angered by that then I'm sorry about that. You are looking to kind of get one over in some weird way. You look to who has contributed and what they've said and form your view around being contrary to that rather than any actual held belief. Perhaps you should lend time to considering what in your life results in you needing to do something like that, rather than finger wagging at someone you'll never know.

Edited by BlueJay (16 Apr 2022 2.20am)