Akshata Murty tax affairs

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 15 of 23 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

BlueJay UK 16 Apr 22 2.54am
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 I haven't changed my 'stance' on this. You just try to imply that when you realise you are spouting bollox. The idiot jibe was at you, as you were the 'outraged'. You really are stupid. Vast numbers of people in fact. I quoted your posts. You can always reference back to that or your actual posts if you have no memory of what you said (which seems to be a recurrent theme). I'm not opening this thread anymore. This pointless back and forth isn't adding anything, so I'll opt out. Edited by BlueJay (16 Apr 2022 10.54am)
Alert a moderator to this post

BlueJay

UK 16 Apr 22 2.54am

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

I haven't changed my 'stance' on this. You just try to imply that when you realise you are spouting bollox.

The idiot jibe was at you, as you were the 'outraged'. You really are stupid.

Vast numbers of people in fact. I quoted your posts. You can always reference back to that or your actual posts if you have no memory of what you said (which seems to be a recurrent theme).

I'm not opening this thread anymore. This pointless back and forth isn't adding anything, so I'll opt out.

Edited by BlueJay (16 Apr 2022 10.54am)

Alert a moderator to this post

HKOwen Hong Kong 16 Apr 22 11.48am
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Pal, I asked a question about how much she paid, you thought that wasn't enough, which in itself is probably true, but she is not doing illegal things. She pays more to the taxman than you. I then said, if you're outraged by it, do something other than whinge. Get it changed. No anger here, just despair at the hopelessness of the younger generation, and you it seems, who are enraged by so much, but feel that if they launch a few outraged posts on social media, all will be well. It's you wagging a finger at Ms Murthy. I haven't changed my 'stance' on this. Or any other topic you slurred me on. You just try to imply that when you realise you are spouting bollox. The idiot jibe was at you, as you were the 'outraged'. You really are stupid. Edit: This as close as I get to an angry post. Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (16 Apr 2022 2.46am) It's clearly annoying you that your posts are systematically picked apart by toddlers and idiots Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.
Alert a moderator to this post

HKOwen

Hong Kong 16 Apr 22 11.48am

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Pal, I asked a question about how much she paid, you thought that wasn't enough, which in itself is probably true, but she is not doing illegal things. She pays more to the taxman than you. I then said, if you're outraged by it, do something other than whinge. Get it changed. No anger here, just despair at the hopelessness of the younger generation, and you it seems, who are enraged by so much, but feel that if they launch a few outraged posts on social media, all will be well. It's you wagging a finger at Ms Murthy.

I haven't changed my 'stance' on this. Or any other topic you slurred me on. You just try to imply that when you realise you are spouting bollox.

The idiot jibe was at you, as you were the 'outraged'. You really are stupid.

Edit: This as close as I get to an angry post.

Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (16 Apr 2022 2.46am)

It's clearly annoying you that your posts are systematically picked apart by toddlers and idiots

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman Caterham 16 Apr 22 3.20pm
Originally posted by HKOwen It's clearly annoying you that your posts are systematically picked apart by toddlers and idiots He says if you’re unhappy about something then change it. But he also calls people outraged idiots if they go and protest. Further he conveniently ignores the fact it’s been a two party political system for a century. Making it easy for the government and the establishment by seeing it this way clearly doesn’t help. COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 16 Apr 22 3.20pm

Originally posted by HKOwen

It's clearly annoying you that your posts are systematically picked apart by toddlers and idiots

He says if you’re unhappy about something then change it. But he also calls people outraged idiots if they go and protest. Further he conveniently ignores the fact it’s been a two party political system for a century. Making it easy for the government and the establishment by seeing it this way clearly doesn’t help.

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 16 Apr 22 4.37pm
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman He says if you’re unhappy about something then change it. But he also calls people outraged idiots if they go and protest. Further he conveniently ignores the fact it’s been a two party political system for a century. Making it easy for the government and the establishment by seeing it this way clearly doesn’t help. But he's correct that she paid more tax in the UK than any of us though. It's either about pound notes or %. Can't mix the two.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 16 Apr 22 4.37pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

But he's correct that she paid more tax in the UK than any of us though.
It's either about pound notes or %. Can't mix the two.

Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree Croydon 16 Apr 22 4.54pm
Originally posted by The Dolphin This woman has not broken any laws. Many might not like the law but it is what it is. Let's have a list of everyone who enjoys this benefit and I have no doubt that the Left will be surprised who is on that list. It is a s*** law that needs changing and maybe the tax office might be better employed doing that than starting an investigation into my Stepson who earns probably £15k/year and is scrupulously honest about it. Politicians are generally corrupt and out for themselves and their officials are generally plain useless! Let me state this again The tax issue is not solely about Akshata Murthy. On the contrary. The family has been paying tax on Sunak's income so that they have money to spend in the UK but not paying any tax at all in the UK, and quite likely almost nothing worldwide, on Murthy's income. So this approach results in the guy that sets the rules gaining an enormous financial benefit from not addressing their weaknesses, forget that it's through his wife it goes into their joint pockets It is surely why people are annoyed, it is a clear conflict of interest. Yet when it was pointed out Sunak himself seemed incandescently angry.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 16 Apr 22 4.54pm

Originally posted by The Dolphin

This woman has not broken any laws.
Many might not like the law but it is what it is.
Let's have a list of everyone who enjoys this benefit and I have no doubt that the Left will be surprised who is on that list.
It is a s*** law that needs changing and maybe the tax office might be better employed doing that than starting an investigation into my Stepson who earns probably £15k/year and is scrupulously honest about it.
Politicians are generally corrupt and out for themselves and their officials are generally plain useless!

Let me state this again

The tax issue is not solely about Akshata Murthy. On the contrary. The family has been paying tax on Sunak's income so that they have money to spend in the UK but not paying any tax at all in the UK, and quite likely almost nothing worldwide, on Murthy's income.

So this approach results in the guy that sets the rules gaining an enormous financial benefit from not addressing their weaknesses, forget that it's through his wife it goes into their joint pockets

It is surely why people are annoyed, it is a clear conflict of interest. Yet when it was pointed out Sunak himself seemed incandescently angry.

Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree Croydon 16 Apr 22 4.56pm
Originally posted by cryrst But he's correct that she paid more tax in the UK than any of us though. It's either about pound notes or %. Can't mix the two. Can you please explain this She doesn't pay income tax or NIC in the UK. The money she spends is Sunak's so e.g. VAT is coming from his funds not hers. She has committed to voluntarily pay income tax in two years time, let's see whether that does happen.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 16 Apr 22 4.56pm

Originally posted by cryrst

But he's correct that she paid more tax in the UK than any of us though.
It's either about pound notes or %. Can't mix the two.

Can you please explain this

She doesn't pay income tax or NIC in the UK. The money she spends is Sunak's so e.g. VAT is coming from his funds not hers. She has committed to voluntarily pay income tax in two years time, let's see whether that does happen.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 16 Apr 22 6.15pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Can you please explain this She doesn't pay income tax or NIC in the UK. The money she spends is Sunak's so e.g. VAT is coming from his funds not hers. She has committed to voluntarily pay income tax in two years time, let's see whether that does happen. I read somewhere that she paid 30k tax in the UK last year. A tiny % of her dough but more than most did. If that is the case then she's contributed.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 16 Apr 22 6.15pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Can you please explain this

I read somewhere that she paid 30k tax in the UK last year.
A tiny % of her dough but more than most did.
If that is the case then she's contributed.

Alert a moderator to this post

becky over the moon 16 Apr 22 6.58pm
Originally posted by cryrst I read somewhere that she paid 30k tax in the UK last year. A tiny % of her dough but more than most did. If that is the case then she's contributed. Yes she would have paid that.....as this article from Reuters explains: [Link] A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 16 Apr 22 6.58pm

Originally posted by cryrst

I read somewhere that she paid 30k tax in the UK last year.
A tiny % of her dough but more than most did.
If that is the case then she's contributed.

Yes she would have paid that.....as this article from Reuters explains:

[Link]

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Mapletree Croydon 16 Apr 22 7.28pm
Originally posted by cryrst I read somewhere that she paid 30k tax in the UK last year. A tiny % of her dough but more than most did. If that is the case then she's contributed. Well, you pay an annual charge of £30,000 if you’ve been here for at least 7 of the previous 9 tax years. She may have done that. But don’t forget she pays no NIC.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 16 Apr 22 7.28pm

Originally posted by cryrst

I read somewhere that she paid 30k tax in the UK last year.
A tiny % of her dough but more than most did.
If that is the case then she's contributed.

Well, you pay an annual charge of £30,000 if you’ve been here for at least 7 of the previous 9 tax years. She may have done that. But don’t forget she pays no NIC.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 16 Apr 22 7.44pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Well, you pay an annual charge of £30,000 if you’ve been here for at least 7 of the previous 9 tax years. She may have done that. But don’t forget she pays no NIC. So it's considered explained then ? Did you pay 30k tax last year?
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 16 Apr 22 7.44pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Well, you pay an annual charge of £30,000 if you’ve been here for at least 7 of the previous 9 tax years. She may have done that. But don’t forget she pays no NIC.

So it's considered explained then ?
Did you pay 30k tax last year?

Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree Croydon 16 Apr 22 11.28pm
Originally posted by cryrst So it's considered explained then ? Did you pay 30k tax last year? Yup. Remember income tax is supposed to be a progressive tax As NIC isn’t paid on the majority of the Sunak family income, coincidentally the increase just effected barely impacts on the Chancellor. What a happy coincidence. Edited by Mapletree (16 Apr 2022 11.31pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 16 Apr 22 11.28pm

Originally posted by cryrst

So it's considered explained then ?
Did you pay 30k tax last year?

Yup.

Remember income tax is supposed to be a progressive tax

As NIC isn’t paid on the majority of the Sunak family income, coincidentally the increase just effected barely impacts on the Chancellor. What a happy coincidence.

Edited by Mapletree (16 Apr 2022 11.31pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 17 Apr 22 12.15am
Originally posted by Mapletree Yup. Remember income tax is supposed to be a progressive tax As NIC isn’t paid on the majority of the Sunak family income, coincidentally the increase just effected barely impacts on the Chancellor. What a happy coincidence. Edited by Mapletree (16 Apr 2022 11.31pm) Is the main objection that she’s rich or that she’s married to a Tory?
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

17 Apr 22 12.15am

Originally posted by Mapletree

Yup.

Remember income tax is supposed to be a progressive tax

As NIC isn’t paid on the majority of the Sunak family income, coincidentally the increase just effected barely impacts on the Chancellor. What a happy coincidence.

Edited by Mapletree (16 Apr 2022 11.31pm)

Is the main objection that she’s rich or that she’s married to a Tory?

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 15 of 23 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Akshata Murty tax affairs

Site Map

Sponsors