Akshata Murty tax affairs
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Nicholas91  The Democratic Republic of Kent 12 Apr 22 3.07pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Slag is funny? I'd like to weigh in here. Yes.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
BlueJay  UK 12 Apr 22 3.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
I'd like to weigh in here. Yes. It's important to diversify in business. There's a lot of money in smelting.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Mapletree  Croydon 12 Apr 22 3.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
I'd like to weigh in here. Yes. In that context no it isn't. Hard to see any time when it's OK to use the word other than in a coal mining sense It's simple sexism and feckin childish in the extreme
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 12 Apr 22 4.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
In that context no it isn't. Hard to see any time when it's OK to use the word other than in a coal mining sense It's simple sexism and feckin childish in the extreme It's not the structural content of the joke itself it's often the reaction it can illicit, for which you have played a perfect part there Maple, kudos. Try not to imagine a slack jawed, yokel's guffaw of the statement itself but the impact on someone who takes themselves so seriously they have lost all sense of humour in any guise, to the extent they do not even realise they are a mere puppet on a string for others with a far more palpable grip on reality's existence. And as for context, this is a football forum, not The Hague, the context is most certainly apt for a childish chuckle. You only demean yourself by elevating it to a level at which it is to be taken so seriously and literally. I'd also add, according to a source of mine, that she is in fact a 'slag', cos he heard she was bunking off school once because she was gonna go down the wimbley and get off with Luke Griffiths, only she never because he's been trying to grow a moustache but it just looks like pubes, so she got off with Luke Torbet instead, only don't tell Bethany that because she's fancied Luke Torbet ever since she flashed her fanny at him during Home Ec'.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 12 Apr 22 5.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
It's not the structural content of the joke itself it's often the reaction it can illicit, for which you have played a perfect part there Maple, kudos. Try not to imagine a slack jawed, yokel's guffaw of the statement itself but the impact on someone who takes themselves so seriously they have lost all sense of humour in any guise, to the extent they do not even realise they are a mere puppet on a string for others with a far more palpable grip on reality's existence. And as for context, this is a football forum, not The Hague, the context is most certainly apt for a childish chuckle. You only demean yourself by elevating it to a level at which it is to be taken so seriously and literally. I'd also add, according to a source of mine, that she is in fact a 'slag', cos he heard she was bunking off school once because she was gonna go down the wimbley and get off with Luke Griffiths, only she never because he's been trying to grow a moustache but it just looks like pubes, so she got off with Luke Torbet instead, only don't tell Bethany that because she's fancied Luke Torbet ever since she flashed her fanny at him during Home Ec'. Do you know Jimenez? He is not known for humour of any form, let alone clever wit based upon irony with a 'palpable grip'. He just thinks she's a slag, maybe she wouldn't snog him behind the bike sheds once.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 12 Apr 22 6.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Do you know Jimenez? He is not known for humour of any form, let alone clever wit based upon irony with a 'palpable grip'. He just thinks she's a slag, maybe she wouldn't snog him behind the bike sheds once. I do not no. And if what you are saying is indeed true, I like to think I've at the very least provided some levity on the thread, I do like to from time to time but would be aghast if I had accidentally, genuinely riled someone to any serious extent in meaning to do so. Cheer up all, we're gonna win 2-1 on Saturday
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BlueJay UK 12 Apr 22 6.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This slag issue appears to be somewhat controversial. Please let Akshata Murty both smelt and conduct her unethical financial affairs in peace. Respect her privacy, her dignity, and her slagging practices.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 13 Apr 22 12.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Your perpetual outrage at a joke about an actors wife's hair (for which a comedian was physically assaulted), makes me question whether you're the best person to talk about the importance of law over emotion. So suddenly only the law matters? A brand new belief system every thread. People taking a view here 'are' considering the ethics of it, not solely which legal loopholes or path that's been forged for the rich by the rich has been used. They're hardly calling for anyone's arrest and you might well know that politicians behaviour (and those influencing them or benefiting from their association) is routinely not aligned with the interests of the tax payer. That's certainly something of relevance. People can decide for themselves how they feel about this and indeed their government. There isn't one way to look at it that's for 'idiots' and one for others; clearly it has split opinion and that's fine. Edited by BlueJay (12 Apr 2022 12.53pm) I wasn't outraged at the joke, let alone "perpetual outrage". I was more questioning the fact that people were outraged at the act of defence of a spouse. You know, like you are outraged by his violence. But this has nothing to do with this thread. It's whataboutery. Again. You constantly divert from the topic. If you post anything valid, I'll reply, otherwise, don't bother. Idiot.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BlueJay UK 13 Apr 22 12.52am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
I wasn't outraged at the joke, let alone "perpetual outrage". I was more questioning the fact that people were outraged at the act of defence of a spouse. You know, like you are outraged by his violence. But this has nothing to do with this thread. It's whataboutery. Again. You constantly divert from the topic. If you post anything valid, I'll reply, otherwise, don't bother. Idiot. Keep your hair on, Timothy. Edited by BlueJay (13 Apr 2022 1.55am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 13 Apr 22 12.53am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Ethics do come into it. He part runs the country. People are taking it up with parliament. If you hadn’t noticed, the government keep an eye on their popularity and it seems Sunak won’t ever be PM now. That good enough for you? Or did you expect 400 independent MP’s or a new party to get elected for the first time for a century within a couple of years? Edited by Rudi Hedman (12 Apr 2022 6.13am) I see where you are coming from, and understand the 'popularity' angle, but what has happened here is not illegal. I get that it appears unethical, but if the system allows it, get the system changed, don't hate on the people who use the system.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 13 Apr 22 12.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Keep your hair on, Timothy. Get yours cut. Idiot.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BlueJay UK 13 Apr 22 12.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
I see where you are coming from, and understand the 'popularity' angle, but what has happened here is not illegal. I get that it appears unethical, but if the system allows it, get the system changed, don't hate on the people who use the system. Now why didn't we think of that before. Silly us.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.