This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
When people say "we don't want the BBC to follow a subscription model because the content is so good we'd hate to see it falter" they are only destroying their own argument. If the content is good a subscription model would succeed. If the content is bad it wouldn't be missed if it didn't succeed. It isn’t, and never has been, the argument.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
No you can't. People pay for them voluntarily as opposed to under threat of prosecution. You pay to watch live TV. Avoid that and you can avoid the licence fee. Up to you. I think you would be much poorer but you can do it. The BBC will continue. It will be paid for by us in some way. Better not via taxation, which allows political pressure to be mounted.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No they aren’t. They are very much more than that. They are the window that the world views us through and a much envied source of truthful and objective reporting. We would be much diminished as a country if the BBC was reduced to the level you, and others, seem to regard them. You actually seriously believe that don't you? You seriously must live in some cloud cuckoo land if that's the case, i pity you. Still, at least you're down somewhere far away not to bother us.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It isn’t, and never has been, the argument. No, I am saying people have made that argument. It is, and has been, the argument. Edited by Part Time James (12 Jul 2023 8.16pm) Edited by Part Time James (12 Jul 2023 8.17pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
The issues didn’t stop him working right up until last week. Neither did they stop him partying at a recent award ceremony. Complete coward by getting his wife to make the statement, she should be working on taking him for all she can get. This is the full statement from his wife. Are you suggesting she is lying? I didn’t know he has a history of depression. Did you?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You pay to watch live TV. Avoid that and you can avoid the licence fee. Up to you. I think you would be much poorer but you can do it. The BBC will continue. It will be paid for by us in some way. Better not via taxation, which allows political pressure to be mounted. Poorer for not spending Christmas night watching EastEnders, Strictly Come Dancing and a 50 year old episode of Dad's Army? I think I'll cope.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
No, I am saying people have made that argument. It, it, and, has, been, the, argument. Anyone who does is misrepresenting the actual reasoning.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t know, anymore than anyone does, on who knew what and when. There has been loads of speculation and I don’t doubt people must have realised later that the behaviour they recall now seems dodgy. I never met Savile but I bought a house from somebody who knew him well and whose daughter spent a lot of time in Stoke Mandeville Hospital. The stories she told me then now seem very creepy but at the time he was a national hero, raising funds for the hospital, working as a porter and getting us all to clunk-click. He duped everyone. I am much less informed about Hall but unless someone had made a complaint about Savile what were the BBC supposed to do back then? Today it would be different. A few people knew.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Anyone who does is misrepresenting the actual reasoning. Right, but it was them that I was referring to rather than your good self. Up until recently I hadn't heard of you.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This is the full statement from his wife. Are you suggesting she is lying? I didn’t know he has a history of depression. Did you? Do you know she isn’t?
|
|
|
'It's all gone quiet, over there'. The Sun (yuk) says it has no plans to publish further allegations about Huw Edwards and will co-operate with BBC investigation.
|
|
|
Paedos and perverts aren't mentally normal. The reason no more is published is police investigation. Again, more subterfuge.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by eagleman13
You actually seriously believe that don't you? You seriously must live in some cloud cuckoo land if that's the case, i pity you. Still, at least you're down somewhere far away not to bother us. I live in the real world. One I have travelled in a great deal. I know how our BBC is regarded elsewhere. In only in little pockets of the biased right do they think as you seem to. The BBC is one of our greatest achievements and probably our biggest asset. Those who seek its destruction should read Simon Jordan’s book. At least as far as the cover.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Do you know she isn’t? No, but until there is evidence to the contrary I assume she is telling the truth. No doubt there will be some corroboration or it would have been a stupid thing to say.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
The issues didn’t stop him working right up until last week. Neither did they stop him partying at a recent award ceremony. Complete coward by getting his wife to make the statement, she should be working on taking him for all she can get. God you are sad The Sun knew this but still chose to use him as a sacrificial lamb to get at the BBC, which it hates.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Did you read the whole of that link? It exonerates the BBC as a whole whilst saying a few people had noticed behaviour that ought to have been reported. That it wasn’t isn’t the fault of the BBC and, in my opinion, not really the fault of the people either. Those were different days and judging yesterday by today’s standards via hindsight might make the self righteous feel vindicated but isn’t actually very helpful. Looking back on what I was told at the time if I heard anything similar today I would definitely report it. Back then I thought this lady is an adult, they are her daughters so none of my business and if I had gone to the police they would have either laughed it off or arrested me for defaming a national treasure. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (12 Jul 2023 10.25pm) As long as the children involved take comfort from this conspiracy of silence.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.