This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
I would also recommend Kershaw. I would, too. See? Agreement is possible, Rumpole.
|
|
| legaleagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
I would, too. See? Agreement is possible, Rumpole. Course it is Funty.
|
|
| legaleagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Diane Abbot, shadow Home Secretary (don't laugh) said regarding the IRA in the 1980s, "a defeat for the British state would be a great liberation". She wouldn't be Home Secretary in a million years IMHO.Many of the good quality ones who resigned would be back in. The best 80's or 90's political quote might be Maggie,the spiritual godmother of the blessed TM and most of the rest of the cabinet,who told Pinochet (mass murdering scum who led a military coup against a democratically elected government): "I'm also very much aware that it is you who brought democracy to Chile..."
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
She wouldn't be Home Secretary in a million years IMHO.Many of the good quality ones who resigned would be back in. The best 80's or 90's political quote might be Maggie,the spiritual godmother of the blessed TM and most of the rest of the cabinet,who told Pinochet (mass murdering scum who led a military coup against a democratically elected government): "I'm also very much aware that it is you who brought democracy to Chile..."
The full quote is: Edited by hedgehog50 (02 Jun 2017 7.22pm)
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Crying foul again? Becoming a bit of a habit. Typical socialist. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (02 Jun 2017 5.47pm) Yawn.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Yawn. Are you tired? All this defending the indefensible wearing you out?
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Are you tired? All this defending the indefensible wearing you out? No, your s***e put downs are droll.
|
|
| legaleagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
The full quote is: ...................................................
The current cabinet are Maggie'spiritual and ideological successors. The Provos would arguably never have arisen had N Ireland not been allowed by us to be like a Northern Mississippi for nearly half a century.Complete balls ups with the civil rights movement (non violent)then led to support growing for the Provos. People like Corbyn who suggested in the 80's we should talk with the Provos were called terrorist sympathisers but were later proved right.Its what Maggie's government started doing through back channels and then the deal was done by the Blair government and,guess what we have peace now benefiting all there...its called "dispute resolution" If you (which you may do) know anything about the 20th century "end of the British empire" it was characterised by people who were characterised as terrorists or terrorist sympathisers (Kenyatta,Makarios) and then after we (as we frequently did) sat down and did the deal,we hailed them as statesman... Ireland was/is a classic colonial situation..which in no way excuses the dodgy excesses of the Provos and the Protestant paramilitaries. Just an opinion. Edited by legaleagle (02 Jun 2017 7.43pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
No, your s***e put downs are droll. Do you know what that means?
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Do you know what that means? I do you old whimsy.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Do you know what that means? 8/11 with BetFred that he doesn't.
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Originally posted by hedgehog50
The full quote is: ...................................................
The current cabinet are Maggie'spiritual and ideological successors. The Provos would arguably never have arisen had N Ireland not been allowed by us to be like a Northern Mississippi for nearly half a century.Complete balls ups with the civil rights movement (non violent)then led to support growing for the Provos. People like Corbyn who suggested in the 80's we should talk with the Provos were called terrorist sympathisers but were later proved right.Its what Maggie's government started doing through back channels and then the deal was done by the Blair government and,guess what we have peace now benefiting all there...its called "dispute resolution" If you (which you may do) know anything about the 20th century "end of the British empire" it was characterised by people who were characterised as terrorists or terrorist sympathisers (Kenyatta,Makarios) and then after we (as we frequently did) sat down and did the deal,we hailed them as statesman... Ireland was/is a classic colonial situation..which in no way excuses the dodgy excesses of the Provos and the Protestant paramilitaries. Just an opinion. Edited by legaleagle (02 Jun 2017 7.43pm) In what way are the current cabinet are Maggie'spiritual and ideological successors? Just because they are Tories? Does that make Corbyn, Blair's spiritual and ideological successor, or perhaps Ramsey MacDonald? Certainly Thatcher's friendliness towards Pinochet does her no credit. But I don't remember him blowing men, women and children to pieces on mainland Britian, and of course his body count is tiny compared to the communists that Corbyn's campaign leader, Andrew Murray praised while a member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, he only left it in December 2016. Corbyn did not just suggest talking to the Provos, he actively showed support for them, as did the shadow Chancellor and shadow Home Secretary - all in a manner similar to the ways you complain about Thatcher. Edited by hedgehog50 (02 Jun 2017 7.59pm)
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| legaleagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
In what way are the current cabinet are Maggie'spiritual and ideological successors? Just because they are Tories? Does that make Corbyn, Blair's spiritual and ideological successor, or perhaps Ramsey MacDonald? Certainly Thatcher's friendliness towards Pinochet does her no credit. But of course his body count is tiny compared to the communists that Corbyn's campaign leader, Andrew Murray praised while a member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, he only left it in December 2016. Corbyn did not just suggest talking to the Provos, he actively showed support for them, as did the shadow Chancellor and shadow Home Secretary - all in a manner similar in the ways you complain about Thatcher. Mr Hedgehog, Your "Pinochet" point doesn't actually answer my point. And you don't apply the same standards to Maggie as you do to Labour politicians.By the way,Maggie also provided military training to the Khmer Rouge. If you disagree that the PM and much of the cabinet are spiritual and ideological successors of Maggie (as opposed to say MacMillan and that Corbyn's is plainly not Ramsey McDonald's) ..I'm not sure I can help you further. Edited by legaleagle (02 Jun 2017 8.06pm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
The full quote is: Edited by hedgehog50 (02 Jun 2017 7.22pm) No Pinochet was a terrorist who came to power backed by the CIA overthrowing the democratically elected government of Allende. He called a referendum in 1988 to confirm his powers but was defeated and had no option but to let the democratic process be restored. IMO you do have to talk to terrorists where there is no prospect of peace and there's no doubt Thatcher knew all about Pinochet and was quite happy to sit down with him likewise Tony Blair with the IRA. To call them your friends however can't see why Thatcher went that far at arms length would have been more appropriate.
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Mr Hedgehog, Your "Pinochet" point doesn't actually answer my point. And you don't apply the same standards to Maggie as you do to Labour politicians.By the way,Maggie also provided military training to the Khmer Rouge. If you disagree that the PM and much of the cabinet are spiritual and ideological successors of Maggie (as opposed to say MacMillan and that Corbyn's is plainly not Ramsey McDonald's) ..I'm not sure I can help you further. Edited by legaleagle (02 Jun 2017 8.06pm) Your point? You disapprove of Thatcher being friendly to Pinochet, and as I said, so do I. Yet you have no problem with Corbyn, McDonnell and Abbot being friendly with IRA murderers. Why don't you apply the same standards to Labour leaders as you do to Thatcher. Is there evidence that Thatcher trained the Khmer Rouge - I do remember many on the left at the time voicing support for them. As for Ramsay MacDonald, if Corbyn came to power, he might well have to reverse all his policies, as MacDonald did, as reality starts to exert itself.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Meanwhile, the underfunded, cash-strapped NHS seeks to recruit more essential staff. Do they have to know first aid?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Do they have to know first aid? There's a whole load of 'diversity' and 'patient experience' drones employed by the NHS. On higher salaries than staff nurses or junior doctors. Everyone talks about 'money for the NHS' without looking into how the money's spent. It is an appallingly badly run organisation.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
There's a whole load of 'diversity' and 'patient experience' drones employed by the NHS. On higher salaries than staff nurses or junior doctors. Everyone talks about 'money for the NHS' without looking into how the money's spent. It is an appallingly badly run organisation. Totally agree. The waste is scandalous.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.