You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer
November 13 2026 7.45am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Sir Keir Starmer


Page 22 of 39 < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >
Matov Flag 19 Apr 21 8.36pm

Originally posted by Tom-the-eagle

It’s funny, I’m generally, (although not exclusively) Right leaning, however I like the fact he doesn’t constantly attack the government. To me it comes across quite classy.

Whilst not my cup of tea, I think he’s fairly credible.

Edited by Tom-the-eagle (19 Apr 2021 7.27pm)

Problem for Starmer is that given the scale of the national crisis, it leaves little room for traditional style opposition so he is playing it pretty much right in terms of generally not appearing too critical.

But he is not credible but for me that reflects a wider problem for Labour as a whole. Since 2015 they have lost Scotland and now have lost a huge swathe of seats in their traditional heartlands.

Brexit has potentially destroyed them as a functioning party with Starmer and his disastrous charge for a second referendum at the very heart of that. Even since 2016 the vast majority of the activists on the left have been slagging off the very people they need to vote for them. They simply do not have the collective intellectual bandwidth to comprehend how out of touch they are.

Ever since the 2015 election Labour have been on their knees with only the Corbyn led 2017 surge by way of halting that. Brexit, European Elections, local elections and then the 2019 GE have been disaster after disaster.

What can Labour offer anybody now? Its membership and activist base are fundamentally lunatics with all this trans BS and desire for open borders (lets not forget that Labours official policy in 2019 was not only to protect freedom of movement but widen it).

They are utterly f***ed. And with boundary changes due to come into effect before 2024, then it moves into the realms of asking what is the point of them anymore?

And outside of Starmer who is there? Andy Burnham is the only possible leader I can see having even a chance of turning the tide and he is not even in the PLP. Labour will not achieve a working majority in this decade and if they don't watch it, they might even cease to exist.

Identity Dogma has destroyed them and yet still they cheer it on.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

jeeagles Flag 19 Apr 21 8.45pm

Originally posted by cryrst

So take brexit out of it and what should he oppose or propose?
Are there Any changes that could be made atm which would make it better for the majority of uk citizens. Thats the numbers game of politics.

Most opposition leaders keep a low profile until a couple of years before an election. Cameron and Millerband both had slow starts.

In fairness to him, its difficult to judge his effectiveness, and he's had to pick up a s***show.

It must be difficult to come up with a policy, when half the party seems solely motivated by running round shouting Tory Scum at the majority of the electorate.

 

Matov Flag 19 Apr 21 8.51pm

Originally posted by jeeagles


It must be difficult to come up with a policy, when half the party seems solely motivated by running round shouting Tory Scum at the majority of the electorate.


The Left are trapped in a purity spiral and they love it. I genuinely believe that many of them are happier not being in Government but believing themselves to hold the moral high-ground. Losing elections is always the fault of the electorate rather than them.

You just have to see their reaction to a statement such as 'British jobs for British workers'. They simply cannot bring themselves to even say it, let alone promote such a notion.


 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

timmyb Flag Banstead 19 Apr 21 9.06pm

Originally posted by Matov


The Left are trapped in a purity spiral and they love it. I genuinely believe that many of them are happier not being in Government but believing themselves to hold the moral high-ground. Losing elections is always the fault of the electorate rather than them.

You just have to see their reaction to a statement such as 'British jobs for British workers'. They simply cannot bring themselves to even say it, let alone promote such a notion.


It was Gordon Brown who actually coined this at one point, wasn't it?

 

Matov Flag 19 Apr 21 9.38pm

Originally posted by timmyb

It was Gordon Brown who actually coined this at one point, wasn't it?

It was pretty much a staple of old Labour for decades. And yes, Brown did attempt to resurrect it but I believe, and am happy to be corrected on this, it soon faded although I believe even Cameron jumped on the bandwagon, slating him for using it which tells you a lot about modern Conservatism.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 2.35am

Love the Starmer, full steam ahead

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Jacey Flag 20 Apr 21 10.02am

Originally posted by HKOwen

Love the Starmer, full steam ahead

With Starmer backed by shadow chancellor,that dreary, dreadful,dopey Annelise Dodds,should keep Boris in charge for many,many years.

Edited by Jacey (20 Apr 2021 10.14am)

 

Matov Flag 20 Apr 21 10.18am

Originally posted by Jacey

With Starmer backed by shadow chancellor,that dreadful,dopey Annelise, should keep Boris in charge for many,many years.


And that is the deeper structural issue for Labour. Who else is there to lead it at the moment?

Every one of its MP's are so wedded to lunacies such as identity politics and/or Remaining in the EU and/or being closely associated with the Corbyn project that they are, by and large, utterly toxic non-entities. I cannot think of a single, credible, sitting Labour MP who you can look at and think they would be a better option than Starmer.

Out of his rivals for the leadership, the only one that I ever rated was Lisa Nandy and even then, she has not set the world alight since Starmer won but at least she saw the iceberg Labour was sailing into, guided by one Sir Kier Starmer, prior to December 2019. Deserves a modicum of respect for that.

But otherwise?

Andy Burnham is literally the only Labour public figure I can think of who might be able to achieve something.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 11.50am

Add in the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Nandy Pandy and the anti semites still hanging around like Burgon and Long-Bailey and they are fooked. Most constituencies still with a Labour MP would vote in a dog turd if you put a red rosette on it.........come to think of it


Originally posted by Jacey

With Starmer backed by shadow chancellor,that dreary, dreadful,dopey Annelise Dodds,should keep Boris in charge for many,many years.

Edited by Jacey (20 Apr 2021 10.14am)

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 11.52am

Burnham is another who is all hindsight .
Let's see some McCluskey comments from Labour

Originally posted by Matov


And that is the deeper structural issue for Labour. Who else is there to lead it at the moment?

Every one of its MP's are so wedded to lunacies such as identity politics and/or Remaining in the EU and/or being closely associated with the Corbyn project that they are, by and large, utterly toxic non-entities. I cannot think of a single, credible, sitting Labour MP who you can look at and think they would be a better option than Starmer.

Out of his rivals for the leadership, the only one that I ever rated was Lisa Nandy and even then, she has not set the world alight since Starmer won but at least she saw the iceberg Labour was sailing into, guided by one Sir Kier Starmer, prior to December 2019. Deserves a modicum of respect for that.

But otherwise?

Andy Burnham is literally the only Labour public figure I can think of who might be able to achieve something.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

silvertop Flag Portishead 20 Apr 21 4.42pm

Originally posted by Matov


And that is the deeper structural issue for Labour. Who else is there to lead it at the moment?

Every one of its MP's are so wedded to lunacies such as identity politics and/or Remaining in the EU and/or being closely associated with the Corbyn project that they are, by and large, utterly toxic non-entities. I cannot think of a single, credible, sitting Labour MP who you can look at and think they would be a better option than Starmer.

Out of his rivals for the leadership, the only one that I ever rated was Lisa Nandy and even then, she has not set the world alight since Starmer won but at least she saw the iceberg Labour was sailing into, guided by one Sir Kier Starmer, prior to December 2019. Deserves a modicum of respect for that.

But otherwise?

Andy Burnham is literally the only Labour public figure I can think of who might be able to achieve something.

Dan Jarvis? I'd vote for him and I never vote Labour.

BTW, the pub landlord was of the Raven. Lovely boozer. Sadly, suspect he is a Corbynista.

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 20 Apr 21 4.49pm

Originally posted by Matov

Problem for Starmer is that given the scale of the national crisis, it leaves little room for traditional style opposition so he is playing it pretty much right in terms of generally not appearing too critical.

But he is not credible but for me that reflects a wider problem for Labour as a whole. Since 2015 they have lost Scotland and now have lost a huge swathe of seats in their traditional heartlands.

Brexit has potentially destroyed them as a functioning party with Starmer and his disastrous charge for a second referendum at the very heart of that. Even since 2016 the vast majority of the activists on the left have been slagging off the very people they need to vote for them. They simply do not have the collective intellectual bandwidth to comprehend how out of touch they are.

Ever since the 2015 election Labour have been on their knees with only the Corbyn led 2017 surge by way of halting that. Brexit, European Elections, local elections and then the 2019 GE have been disaster after disaster.

What can Labour offer anybody now? Its membership and activist base are fundamentally lunatics with all this trans BS and desire for open borders (lets not forget that Labours official policy in 2019 was not only to protect freedom of movement but widen it).

They are utterly f***ed. And with boundary changes due to come into effect before 2024, then it moves into the realms of asking what is the point of them anymore?

And outside of Starmer who is there? Andy Burnham is the only possible leader I can see having even a chance of turning the tide and he is not even in the PLP. Labour will not achieve a working majority in this decade and if they don't watch it, they might even cease to exist.

Identity Dogma has destroyed them and yet still they cheer it on.

Good post. And for those on the right (i.e. most posters on this site) do not cheer this possibility unless you believe in autocratic rule. A government without effective opposition lacks the checks and balances to govern in any semblance of a democratic way.

However, fear not. Even where opposition is rubbish, our system is such that all governments, no matter how entrenched, eventually tear themselves apart with power chasing, sleaze and endemic corruption.

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 20 Apr 21 4.51pm

Originally posted by HKOwen

Add in the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Nandy Pandy and the anti semites still hanging around like Burgon and Long-Bailey and they are fooked. Most constituencies still with a Labour MP would vote in a dog turd if you put a red rosette on it.........come to think of it


Last election proved otherwise

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 20 Apr 21 4.52pm

Originally posted by silvertop

Last election proved otherwise

And you can say the same for the blue side especially rural middle England.

 

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 11.35pm

I agree the voting polarisation of the country into urban and rural is clear.

That does not explain the Red Wall collapse which was issue driven not historical voting pattern.

The argument would be Labour can no longer expect " the workers " to blindly vote for a party which does not reflect their values and aspirations.

"Traditional " Labour were not interested in a Corbyn led government that ignored their desire for Brexit and basically disrespected them as stupid racists, and seem equally unimpressed by Starmer so far.


All of this is subjective as these opinions are all subjective.


Originally posted by silvertop

And you can say the same for the blue side especially rural middle England.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 11.37pm

" Still " obviously means now, not at the last election.

Originally posted by silvertop

Last election proved otherwise

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 11.40pm

Agree, and I hope they continue on the same self destructive path.

Starmer going to Bath of all places was a good example of his out of touchness ( is that a word )

Originally posted by Matov

Problem for Starmer is that given the scale of the national crisis, it leaves little room for traditional style opposition so he is playing it pretty much right in terms of generally not appearing too critical.

But he is not credible but for me that reflects a wider problem for Labour as a whole. Since 2015 they have lost Scotland and now have lost a huge swathe of seats in their traditional heartlands.

Brexit has potentially destroyed them as a functioning party with Starmer and his disastrous charge for a second referendum at the very heart of that. Even since 2016 the vast majority of the activists on the left have been slagging off the very people they need to vote for them. They simply do not have the collective intellectual bandwidth to comprehend how out of touch they are.

Ever since the 2015 election Labour have been on their knees with only the Corbyn led 2017 surge by way of halting that. Brexit, European Elections, local elections and then the 2019 GE have been disaster after disaster.

What can Labour offer anybody now? Its membership and activist base are fundamentally lunatics with all this trans BS and desire for open borders (lets not forget that Labours official policy in 2019 was not only to protect freedom of movement but widen it).

They are utterly f***ed. And with boundary changes due to come into effect before 2024, then it moves into the realms of asking what is the point of them anymore?

And outside of Starmer who is there? Andy Burnham is the only possible leader I can see having even a chance of turning the tide and he is not even in the PLP. Labour will not achieve a working majority in this decade and if they don't watch it, they might even cease to exist.

Identity Dogma has destroyed them and yet still they cheer it on.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 21 Apr 21 9.51am

Perhaps we are witnessing the death of the traditional parties. It seems a lot about Social Media these days. Labour just seem disconnected from their original base. I used to be one, but would never have voted for Corbyn's Labour. The last I liked was John Smith. Starmer is the safe choice, probably has a chance when people are bored with the Tories. Nothing will change until politics is completely overhauled. I can't help but think our current system, in plenty of Western democracies, is not fit for purpose. I presume new parties will emerge, parties that will be more relevant to modern life.

 


Red and Blue Army!

silvertop Flag Portishead 21 Apr 21 11.25am

Originally posted by HKOwen

Agree, and I hope they continue on the same self destructive path.

Starmer going to Bath of all places was a good example of his out of touchness ( is that a word )

That's true. Bath swerves from Tory to Lib Dem every election. Labour who? Fight the battles you can win mate.

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 21 Apr 21 11.35am

Originally posted by silvertop

That's true. Bath swerves from Tory to Lib Dem every election. Labour who? Fight the battles you can win mate.

The Lib Dems gained the seat from the Conservatives in 2017 and held on to it in 2019.
Us Conservatives held the seat from the 1930s until 1992. Chris Patten who had been MP for several years lost his seat to the Lib Dem candidate in the 1992 General Election.


Edited by Willo (21 Apr 2021 11.40am)

 

Page 22 of 39 < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer