You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
May 29 2024 3.03am

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 31 of 414 < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 >

 

View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 26 Aug 20 6.01pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

I think the only time I watch the BBC is MOTD and if I had to I would pay for that program. My opposition to the licence fee is a perfectly valid position shared by a growing number of people.

At the moment the percentage of non payers is going up 1% pa at last count is was 7% at some point like the poll tax you hit the tipping point when people who are not as concerned as you and me think hang on why should I pay if my neighbours don't.

By the way the licence fee is a regressive tax that hurts the poor.

I made the point about ITV it also applies to the other mainstream channels I find they are all pretty awful it's not just the BBC however I don't have to pay not to watch them.

Yes it could come out of general taxation but much simpler to free the BBC from it public service obligations and allow it to become whatever it wants to.

Sorry I spoke.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 26 Aug 20 6.04pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Sorry I spoke.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 26 Aug 20 6.44pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Surely even raving looney-leftie luvvies are now finding the output of the BBC to be cringeworthy ?

woke, PC, revisionist historians and commie bandwagon jumpers.

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CrazyBadger's Profile CrazyBadger Flag Ware 27 Aug 20 11.20am Send a Private Message to CrazyBadger Add CrazyBadger as a friend

Originally posted by JRW2

So also said Lord Grade (former BBC Chairman) this morning, adding that the BBC's journalists were out of touch and its decision on the Proms was idiotic.

I have little doubt that the songs will be reinstated next year, but I have considerable doubt at to whether they would have been reinstated in the absence of the recent uproar.

Again, someone's opinion who most likely wasn't involved with the details of that decision. He may have been the head of the Beeb some 15 years ago, doesn't mean he knows whats going on now.

I haven't seen any evidence that this decision was based on the recent blm/Slave issues, someone has put 2 and 2 together and gotten 5. They've said it out load and it's been run with.

People are so quick to jump on anything that allows them to be outraged, and vent their spleen without any form of evidence except other peoples assumptions.

 


"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eaglecoops's Profile Eaglecoops Flag CR3 27 Aug 20 11.37am Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by CrazyBadger

Again, someone's opinion who most likely wasn't involved with the details of that decision. He may have been the head of the Beeb some 15 years ago, doesn't mean he knows whats going on now.

I haven't seen any evidence that this decision was based on the recent blm/Slave issues, someone has put 2 and 2 together and gotten 5. They've said it out load and it's been run with.

People are so quick to jump on anything that allows them to be outraged, and vent their spleen without any form of evidence except other peoples assumptions.

Apart from the interview which established that it had been discussed in relation to BLM etc but he refused to say the reason for pulling the singing was that, falling back on a convenient script that it wouldn't be the same without the audience. Well, the whole Proms is not going to be the same without the audience but they haven't cancelled it.

Jerusalem and the national anthem are both to be sung. Now if there was no singing throughout the Proms then I would accept their decision, however seeing as there are soloists and the BBC chorus there I don't think that will be the case.

This is clearly a case of 2+2 equalling 4.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 27 Aug 20 11.44am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by CrazyBadger

Again, someone's opinion who most likely wasn't involved with the details of that decision. He may have been the head of the Beeb some 15 years ago, doesn't mean he knows whats going on now.

I haven't seen any evidence that this decision was based on the recent blm/Slave issues, someone has put 2 and 2 together and gotten 5. They've said it out load and it's been run with.

People are so quick to jump on anything that allows them to be outraged, and vent their spleen without any form of evidence except other peoples assumptions.

Really?

"If dropping racist propaganda from taxpayer-funded TV is controversial, then there is no hope for the serious work that needs to be done to address racism’’ - Black Studies Professor
@kehinde_andrews
quoted by
@AP
in
@washingtonpost

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CrazyBadger's Profile CrazyBadger Flag Ware 27 Aug 20 11.50am Send a Private Message to CrazyBadger Add CrazyBadger as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

Apart from the interview which established that it had been discussed in relation to BLM etc but he refused to say the reason for pulling the singing was that, falling back on a convenient script that it wouldn't be the same without the audience. Well, the whole Proms is not going to be the same without the audience but they haven't cancelled it.

Jerusalem and the national anthem are both to be sung. Now if there was no singing throughout the Proms then I would accept their decision, however seeing as there are soloists and the BBC chorus there I don't think that will be the case.

This is clearly a case of 2+2 equalling 4.

I'm not aware of this interview. Who was it with?

I understand that other songs are sung, and it is strange that they have chosen to sing some and not others. But people are leaping to accuse them of something, and others are taking those accusations as fact.

 


"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CrazyBadger's Profile CrazyBadger Flag Ware 27 Aug 20 11.57am Send a Private Message to CrazyBadger Add CrazyBadger as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Really?

"If dropping racist propaganda from taxpayer-funded TV is controversial, then there is no hope for the serious work that needs to be done to address racism’’ - Black Studies Professor
@kehinde_andrews
quoted by
@AP
in
@washingtonpost


It's not a racism row! someone has brought the racism issue into it.
Whether Land of Hope and Glory is racist propaganda is not the argument here....

If they hadn't made this decision to drop the Songs (which they have explained their reasons for - and are not race related) then they would have sung the songs at the proms, and there would be no uproar*.

*whether this is correct or not is a whole different argument.

 


"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 27 Aug 20 12.43pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Really?

"If dropping racist propaganda from taxpayer-funded TV is controversial, then there is no hope for the serious work that needs to be done to address racism’’ - Black Studies Professor
@kehinde_andrews
quoted by
@AP
in
@washingtonpost

Proud British songs are ‘racist propaganda’?

Kehinde Andrews intentions are very clear. Stir it up and/or try to remove any British identity he can manage to get away with.

You take any notice of that racist and divisive Kehinde Andrews idiot making money lecturing and indoctrinating impressionable youngsters with £9,000 student fees wasted on a nothing degree? I’ve seen him on BBC1’s The Big Questions too many times and he’s actually spitting across the floor in debates. He’s an appalling person who’s unfortunately been psychologically scarred by his experiences of the NF etc in the 1980’s. He’s so appalling I doubt he experienced anything bad himself and he’s lying after finding a niche of being Birmingham and England’s top race obsessed f***wit.

I’ve seen him on GMTV clips this week as I don’t watch the s*** outrage stirring programme having to be corrected and reigned in on his Britain hating rants. The best one was him deploring WWII bomber command because of the German civilian casualties. He had to be reminded if it wasn’t for lots of WWII he wouldn’t be here or even alive. t***s like this given a platform is very irresponsible and just stoking fires, which is exactly what this bitter and hate filled man has polluting his brain.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (27 Aug 2020 12.46pm)

Edited by Rudi Hedman (27 Aug 2020 12.47pm)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 27 Aug 20 12.46pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by CrazyBadger


It's not a racism row! someone has brought the racism issue into it.
Whether Land of Hope and Glory is racist propaganda is not the argument here....

If they hadn't made this decision to drop the Songs (which they have explained their reasons for - and are not race related) then they would have sung the songs at the proms, and there would be no uproar*.

*whether this is correct or not is a whole different argument.

Kehinde Andrews is obsessed with race tension and depends on it. Without it he’s irrelevant. He’s irrelevant anyway but s*** tv producers invite him on or know his hatred will get viewers and it doesn’t need that many impressionable or direction seeking youngsters to enroll on a Black Studies course for £9,000 a year to make it worthwhile.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CrazyBadger's Profile CrazyBadger Flag Ware 27 Aug 20 1.17pm Send a Private Message to CrazyBadger Add CrazyBadger as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Kehinde Andrews is obsessed with race tension and depends on it. Without it he’s irrelevant. He’s irrelevant anyway but s*** tv producers invite him on or know his hatred will get viewers and it doesn’t need that many impressionable or direction seeking youngsters to enroll on a Black Studies course for £9,000 a year to make it worthwhile.

sounds Like he's one of the people I was talking about earlier... eager to jump on anything that that may outrage.

 


"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 27 Aug 20 1.23pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by CrazyBadger

sounds Like he's one of the people I was talking about earlier... eager to jump on anything that that may outrage.

Check his Twitter feed.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 31 of 414 < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)