Google filters its results ideologically.

Outside of progressive western institutions you will find the majority of the world thinks what you are saying here is insane.

If you even go back twenty years, those same institutions wouldn't agree with you. They have radically changed and that's not science, it's the ideology of those employed. What you claim is very very recent and is political. Lot of them also say race isn't real either, despite the mountain of evidence for it....just go into a sickle cell unit.

Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Aug 2024 5.41pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

She has a biological unfair advantage. The fact she might be a crap boxer is secondary.

If she wasn't eligible for one competition, then ask yourself why she was for the Olympics.

Let me answer for you. It is about loony identity politics trumping common sense. It is hiding behind technicalities.

What I wonder will you say if a female boxer is killed or seriously injured by a transgender or someone with similar advantages?
How will your little bubble of ideological self righteous clap trap help their family?

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (02 Aug 2024 5.45pm)

Dr Tom Sawyer - was he a Fin?

Red and Blue Army!

Lots of Olympians have biological advantages - that’s generally what makes them so impressive. What we determine as unfair within that is an interesting talking point.

As I’ve already said, there are reasonable conversations to be had around the likes of Semenya and Khalife’s participation in sports, but this bulls*** about her being a man is just objectively nonsense. Being trans is illegal in Algeria for starters… the idea that they would enter a trans athlete is absurd.

Many sports don’t allow trans women to participate - I have never for a second said I would support trans women competing in women’s sport. My point is simply that this isn’t one of those cases - this is not someone dominating a sport, nor seemingly causing any more injury than any other boxer.

No, don't do that.

You stated that men being born with XY Chromosomes and women XX was 'factually untrue'.

Those were your words.

Now you want to base the opposite on a condition that effects 1 in an 100,000 females and in most cases isn't even reported.

We all see what is happening here and I know a bloke's frame when I see it.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

You can't possibly mean China . . .

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Of course it is factually untrue to say that, if we acknowledge there are exceptions - the fact that those exceptions are rare doesn’t change that.

Loads of women have masculine frames - the idea that you just get to decide someone is transsexual because of how they look is laughable. As is the idea of a conservative Islamic nation like Algeria knowingly entering a trans athlete to represent them. Unless we’re suggesting she’s even fooled them for her whole career?

Who spoke about trans? I didn't....however, if you want to go down the line that this isn't being manipulated then....are you interested in this bridge I'd like to sell you?

Only progressives can twist themselves into a position where a bloke gets to beat up a woman and they say nothing to see here.

It's really not that complicated. If someone is born with XY and has grown with the resultant male hormones at levels outside the scope of the normal female range then they can't box.

The vast majority of humans understand that.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)