This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Old BMJ article from 2021 Data indicate that neutralising antibodies last for several months in patients with covid-19 but gently fall in number over time. One study, published in the journal Immunity, of 5882 people who had recovered from covid-19 infection, found that antibodies were still present in their blood five to seven months after illness. This was true for mild and severe cases, though people with severe disease ended up with more antibodies overall. All of the vaccines approved so far produce strong antibody responses. The study group for the Moderna vaccine reported in April that participants in an ongoing clinical trial had high levels of antibodies six months after their second dose. A study in the Lancet found that the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine induced high antibodies with “minimal waning” for three months after a single dose. Natural immunity appears slightly better than from the vaccines but there was some debate it may be more specific to the strain and give less broad based coverage. It'll be interesting to see what they think currently.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
Natural Selection surely? Darwin would be proud.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It'll be interesting to see what they think currently. The Lancet, March 2022 Foremost, the scientific evidence must be considered. Specific to SARS-CoV-2, some results suggest that vaccine-induced immunity is more effective,3 other results suggest that natural immunity is more effective,4 and some findings estimate both options as roughly equal.5 All evidence appears to support that prior immunity helps reduce frequency of severe outcomes and prevents future infections. The scientific evidence thus supports an advantage for some level of protection beyond unvaccinated and uninfected, but further study is needed.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
The Lancet, March 2022 Foremost, the scientific evidence must be considered. Specific to SARS-CoV-2, some results suggest that vaccine-induced immunity is more effective,3 other results suggest that natural immunity is more effective,4 and some findings estimate both options as roughly equal.5 All evidence appears to support that prior immunity helps reduce frequency of severe outcomes and prevents future infections. The scientific evidence thus supports an advantage for some level of protection beyond unvaccinated and uninfected, but further study is needed. Not that piece is really saying much.....but the Lancet published the letter that denied any chance of Covid being from the Wuhan lab. Personally I'm more trusting of the BMJ. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Jul 2022 6.59pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Would absolutely love it is trump got back in. The world fell apart since the election was stolen by the evil democrats.
|
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
its amazing how the Media kiss ass to Biden, and treat Trump like a criminal. The Trump visit has gotten so little publicity....its almost like a conspiracy. and as for Biden ? what a muppet Quite possibly because he has been indicted so many times he is one? Or certainly treated with a huge dose of suspicion.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Would absolutely love it is trump got back in. The world fell apart since the election was stolen by the evil democrats. Is that a joke? Surely no-body actually believes that clap-trap anymore?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Is that a joke? Surely no-body actually believes that clap-trap anymore? And if they do ?
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
And if they do ? It's further evidence of the way some people are prepared to believe without evidence because of a lack of trust in traditional sources of information.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It's further evidence of the way some people are prepared to believe without evidence because of a lack of trust in traditional sources of information. Pot Kettle etc.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Pot Kettle etc. That's a very odd comment. I do tend to trust traditional, edited, regulated and overseen sources rather than the wild west lawlessness of social media and unrestricted internet sources.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I think it is you who is doing the misreading! Go back to the original comment, and you will very clearly see that your interpretation is wrong, and mine correct. My assertions are therefore valid. Something, if you have the experience you claim, you will understand even better than I do. This constant targetting of a man who suffered such huge family traumas and then from addition and mental health issues, just to sling mud at his father is despicable. The Trump sons don't have any of that in their background, just privilege. An apology would be nice, but somehow I doubt whether one will be forthcoming. We'll see. Not having to read your idiotic posts would be even nicer. I think that perhaps we have made a collective mistake by responding to your provocations for a little too long.
|
|
|
I tend to not like listening to racist liars!
|
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
Trump will be on GB News......interviewed by Nigel Farage at 7pm. in other words, imminently. Or catch up on their media player. I simply could not miss the interview with Donald Trump. It was exceedingly enjoyable. I do not have a proclivity to contribute to the 'News & Politics'
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.