You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
June 13 2024 6.32pm

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 335 of 2586 < 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 >

Topic Locked

View NickinOX's Profile NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 04 Jul 16 7.44pm Send a Private Message to NickinOX Add NickinOX as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

My points stand. Being disenfranchised is an accurate reflection and is not grammatically or logically incorrect.

Your link is from 28 June. The data has been superseded, see above.

I didn't say it was grammatically incorrect. I simply pointed out that what you said did not match what you were claiming.

As for the survey, it is only one of a number and just because it is a couple of days more recent does not guarantee it is more accurate. It also seems (at the moment), to be the only one claiming that. Of course, that may change.

This survey reflects far more of the commentary in the press, but I would not take it as being any more definitive in isolation than the LSE one you cite:

[Link]


Edited by NickinOX (04 Jul 2016 8.02pm)

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 04 Jul 16 8.12pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

You're missing the point completely - if someone acts like a spoilt brat, feel free to tell them or take the piss - the difference is assuming everybody else within that demographic thinks and acts the same, as you and others have done many times on this thread - and it was those same voices posting about how unfair it is to label all leavers racists - it's exactly the same principle.

Have we? If you can prove we have then fair enough, but I think I may have called the whingers, whiners, sulkers and complainers because that is what they're doing. I don't think I have criticised and labelled the whole demographic in that way. Well not intentionally anyway. Maybe things like the 'sulking youngsters' may have been used but that's specifically sulking youngsters, not all the young.

Maybe I should label them the 'young and educated sulking and whingeing youngsters.' Maybe that'll be more specific.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 04 Jul 16 8.20pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by NickinOX

I didn't say it was grammatically incorrect. I simply pointed out that what you said did not match what you were claiming.

As for the survey, it is only one of a number and just because it is a couple of days more recent does not guarantee it is more accurate. It also seems (at the moment), to be the only one claiming that. Of course, that may change.

This survey reflects far more of the commentary in the press, but I would not take it as being any more definitive in isolation than the LSE one you cite:

[Link]


Edited by NickinOX (04 Jul 2016 8.02pm)

I must be missing something

I don't see any empirical data on turnout patterns by age. All I see is that overall where there were higher numbers of older people the turnout was higher. On its own that means nothing. It is linked to geography not to the demographic. So it isn't on a par with the LSE survey as you imply.

To be clear, you don't have to be engaged to become disengaged. You don't have to have been enchanted to be disenchanted. You don't have to have been illusioned to be disillusioned. You don't have to have been interested to be disinterested. I think my point is obvious on disenfranchisement.


Edited by Mapletree (04 Jul 2016 8.21pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View NickinOX's Profile NickinOX Flag Sailing country. 04 Jul 16 8.50pm Send a Private Message to NickinOX Add NickinOX as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

I must be missing something

I don't see any empirical data on turnout patterns by age. All I see is that overall where there were higher numbers of older people the turnout was higher. On its own that means nothing. It is linked to geography not to the demographic. So it isn't on a par with the LSE survey as you imply.

To be clear, you don't have to be engaged to become disengaged. You don't have to have been enchanted to be disenchanted. You don't have to have been illusioned to be disillusioned. You don't have to have been interested to be disinterested. I think my point is obvious on disenfranchisement.


Edited by Mapletree (04 Jul 2016 8.21pm)

I think you are missing something.

Clearly, I need to quote your own words back to you again: "16 and 17 year olds are bitter at being disenfranchised." i.e. They had the franchise, then it was removed and they are bitter about it. I don't disagree that someone can be disenfranchised without having ever had the vote, but that is not what you wrote.

You are right, there is no empirical data. I never claimed there was. In fact, despite your attempt at a straw man argument, I pointed out the surveys provided no more than pieces of information that were to be treated with scepticism in isolation. The two links I provided merely show some information about Brexit voters, and some journalists' interpretation of the information. Nothing more.

 


If you come to a fork in the road, take it.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 04 Jul 16 8.58pm

You can join the army at 16 but not have a say in how the country is governed! Ridiculous.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 04 Jul 16 9.04pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Disenfranchised my Ass. The Only thing kids at that age should be disenfranchised about is what to wear at the weekend & whether they are going to get their leg over.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 04 Jul 16 9.05pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by NickinOX

I think you are missing something.

Clearly, I need to quote your own words back to you again: "16 and 17 year olds are bitter at being disenfranchised." i.e. They had the franchise, then it was removed and they are bitter about it. I don't disagree that someone can be disenfranchised without having ever had the vote, but that is not what you wrote.

You are right, there is no empirical data. I never claimed there was. In fact, despite your attempt at a straw man argument, I pointed out the surveys provided no more than pieces of information that were to be treated with scepticism in isolation. The two links I provided merely show some information about Brexit voters, and some journalists' interpretation of the information. Nothing more.

Sadly you don't understand the definition of the word. You don't have to have been enfranchised to become disenfranchised, merely to feel it. I tried to explain but am now disillusioned and disinterested.

Regarding voting patterns, you can't treat each source equally. Only one is based on proper analysis. You imply each source should be treated as valid and equal, not true.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 04 Jul 16 9.07pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

You can join the army at 16 but not have a say in how the country is governed! Ridiculous.

Only as a junior soldier,can not do active service.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 04 Jul 16 9.08pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

You can join the army at 16 but not have a say in how the country is governed! Ridiculous.

And do you really think sixteen year olds have enough about them to vote .

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 04 Jul 16 9.09pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

Disenfranchised my Ass. The Only thing kids at that age should be disenfranchised about is what to wear at the weekend & whether they are going to get their leg over.

Do you know, I used to wonder why we got so few new posters and so few from our younger supporters. Of course, the reason must be they are lazy, feckless and have no interest in Palace, local affairs or current affairs. Or, just maybe, they don't feel especially welcomed or valued.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 04 Jul 16 9.09pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Sadly you don't understand the definition of the word. You don't have to have been enfranchised to become disenfranchised, merely to feel it. I tried to explain but am now disillusioned and disinterested.

Regarding voting patterns, you can't treat each source equally. Only one is based on proper analysis. You imply each source should be treated as valid and equal, not true.

This song sums up the last 12 hours...

[Link]

You are both right regarding disenfranchisement. All about context and semantics innit!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 04 Jul 16 9.10pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

And do you really think sixteen year olds have enough about them to vote .

Absobloominglutely.

Put my daughter in a room with my mother and see who wins the debates. And my mother is a denizen of a certain national political party, attending conferences n everything.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 335 of 2586 < 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic