But you voted for remain and continued mass immigration to the UK?

Building all those new houses, hospitals, schools, roads, etc to cater for this influx of people and their offspring .... won't that affect climate change, the environment and wildlife then?

-.-'

Yes because our contribution to all of those is so massive.

Are you referring to the Eagles end of season clear-out??????

Regards

We are the proverbial culture in the Petrie dish using up its broth. We will die in our own s*** if we don't act decisively.
That said, the big players need to cut pollution and it's use of world resources if we have any chance. Britain is a speck.
Population is the biggest factor,locally and globally.

I believe it is 11% of all land is considered to be built upon, or 3% if you strip out gardens and parks within those areas.

But there is no question that environmental concerns were a legitimate reason to consider voting Remain. As Hrolf suggested the UK contribution to climate change is probably limited, but the EU as a combined bloc influenced by green policies could have had more impact (and indeed had greater negotiating impact in trying to encourage other territories to follow suit).

Plus you are assuming that if that "uncontrolled immigration" didn't come here then those people would simply not exist if you think not letting them into the UK stops environment damage? They still exist. They still do 'environmental damage' whichever country they live in.

"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show

I have to question your pollution around Heathrow is higher because of immigration remark.
1. Do all immigrants charter their own flights or come on flights that are already scheduled and coming here anyway.
2. Using your logic, we should stop everyone coming here because of how they get here. Also don't those pesky tourists take up valuable resources?
Ridiculous Hoof, even for yeu.

On immigration... THE pesky ONS are at it again. [Link]

Your remarks just go to show you are uncomfortable discussing anything to do with mathematics and logic....

Point 1 - Airlines schedule flights according to demand... they don't run them for the fun of it. Because of the higher and rising immigration experienced in these last 5 decades the Airlines have increased their flights to meet the demand... that is why Heathrow want another runway.

Point 2 - You are being silly and reactive... point 1 above explains my logic perfectly with regard to immigrants. Tourists are another matter and the amount of unnecessary flying that a lot of people do these days having numerous overseas holidays does concern me yes... and our planet suffers from all the pollution as a result obviously.

Please don't smugly dismiss my arguments when you don't understand them... my mathematical ability and logic is far superior to your own.... I have tried to get your brain to understand pensions in the past but you struggle with the concept.

Stick to simple things that you understand.

As I said earlier your feeble brain is not capable of making the leap from the concept of supply and demand.

Get a grown up to explain it you with mini eggs or apples.

You're starting to get irritating again and we are at the stage where I prefer to debate with others that don't employ your tactics and can accept at least some of what they read without resorting to repetition and other dodgy tricks.

I'm off limits to you again I'm afraid before I end up spending hours going round in circles.

You spoil it for everyone.

Edited by Hoof Hearted (14 Apr 2017 10.57am)