This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
hedgehog50 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Lots of 'progressives' within Labour know that to change society you have to bring its current model down.....I don't think they are all that worried about debt...because secretly in their minds all that will be wiped or become unimportant within a new order. For a lot of them it's about 'feelings' and 'justice' before any practical elements of capitalism. Most of us were left wingers when we were young and didn't really understand capitalism and socialism nor how to compare to other systems. Plenty of people grow out of being left wing once they start paying any significant taxes as adults.....Many never do and unsurprisingly their political position doesn't change. In my travels in life I met a few left wing minded people with high minded ideals for others but who also put a lot of effort into paying as little tax as possible. They may not like to reflect upon it...but for many of them it isn't about rationality but rather self interest....Or...if they aren't at the party then let the party burn.....A kind of resentment born of envy.....In some respects a justified resentment but that's how it seems to me. I think a lot of it is them simply ignoring history. There have been attempts to create societies without capitalism driving the economy, with no huge disparities in wealth, the holy grail of 'equality' more or less achieved, the state ensuring full employment, housing and health care. All of these implementations of what the left want ended in failure, and while they were in being were characterised by the people they were supposedly championing making every effort to flee the countries to get to capitalist countries. Along with of course total repression of the sorts of freedoms the left enjoy in the societies they hate so much.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
I think a lot of it is them simply ignoring history. There have been attempts to create societies without capitalism driving the economy, with no huge disparities in wealth, the holy grail of 'equality' more or less achieved, the state ensuring full employment, housing and health care. All of these implementations of what the left want ended in failure, and while they were in being were characterised by the people they were supposedly championing making every effort to flee the countries to get to capitalist countries. Along with of course total repression of the sorts of freedoms the left enjoy in the societies they hate so much. I don't think that you can have a society with limited resources, which doesn't require some kind of capitalism. Socialism works better as a critique of the problems of capitalism, as presenting a means of regulating against those problems, than as a means of creating a better society. Changing an economic model won't create a better society, just a different one. We've seen that when trying to introduce democracy to a country without the progress of change that led to the rise of democratic systems. And of course changing an economic model doesn't reflect in a change in people to accept it either.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Lots of 'progressives' within Labour know that to change society you have to bring its current model down.....I don't think they are all that worried about debt...because secretly in their minds all that will be wiped or become unimportant within a new order. For a lot of them it's about 'feelings' and 'justice' before any practical elements of capitalism. Most of us were left wingers when we were young and didn't really understand capitalism and socialism nor how to compare to other systems. Plenty of people grow out of being left wing once they start paying any significant taxes as adults.....Many never do and unsurprisingly their political position doesn't change. In my travels in life I met a few left wing minded people with high minded ideals for others but who also put a lot of effort into paying as little tax as possible. They may not like to reflect upon it...but for many of them it isn't about rationality but rather self interest....Or...if they aren't at the party then let the party burn.....A kind of resentment born of envy.....In some respects a justified resentment but that's how it seems to me.
Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 5.02pm) This is very true Stirling,I live in a nice village in north Bedfordshire with lots of quite high priced houses and some local authority housing.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No you can't. It would be highly unscientific to do so because there are far too many unknown factors. Have you head of econometrics?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
hedgehog50 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I don't think that you can have a society with limited resources, which doesn't require some kind of capitalism. Socialism works better as a critique of the problems of capitalism, as presenting a means of regulating against those problems, than as a means of creating a better society. Changing an economic model won't create a better society, just a different one. We've seen that when trying to introduce democracy to a country without the progress of change that led to the rise of democratic systems. And of course changing an economic model doesn't reflect in a change in people to accept it either. The societies I described implemented what many on the left here call for, cradle to grave state support in terms of jobs, housing, education, health care etc (albeit many got to the grave bit a lot quicker than they expected to). So we have the economic and social policies that the left call for seen in practice - and seen to fail. Why can't the left see this?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
pefwin ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by elgrande
Damn right should be a lynching.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Have you head of econometrics? Have you heard of pseudoscience?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I don't think that you can have a society with limited resources, which doesn't require some kind of capitalism. Socialism works better as a critique of the problems of capitalism, as presenting a means of regulating against those problems, than as a means of creating a better society. Changing an economic model won't create a better society, just a different one. We've seen that when trying to introduce democracy to a country without the progress of change that led to the rise of democratic systems. And of course changing an economic model doesn't reflect in a change in people to accept it either. This is how I like to think of it as well....the principle of socialism in the sense of trying to move towards a fairer society....It being used as a check upon the worst excesses of capitalism....In think in part that's where a lot of the west is. Of course the argument about what a 'fairer' society looks like is a different debate but I think the idea that socialism is best when it modifies capitalism is a good one....Just as long as capitalism is the system driving the car....Socialism can hold the map....But never look to take over. Capitalism and Socialism can be compared to the Sun....Insomuch as capitalism is the nuclear process pushing the expansion preventing collaspe while socialism works like gravity containing the expansion and pushing back. Find a happy medium and you get the best of both....let one dominate too much and inevitably it all goes Pete Tong. Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 6.47pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
nickgusset ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
This is how I like to think of it as well....the principle of socialism in the sense of trying to move towards a fairer society....It being used as a check upon the worst excesses of capitalism....In think in part that's where a lot of the west is. Of course the argument about what a 'fairer' society looks like is a different debate but I think the idea that socialism is best when it modifies capitalism is a good one....Just as long as capitalism is the system driving the car....Socialism can hold the map....But never look to take over. Capitalism and Socialism can be compared to the Sun....Insomuch as capitalism is the nuclear process pushing the expansion preventing collaspe while socialism works like gravity containing the expansion and pushing back. Find a happy medium and you get the best of both....let one dominate too much and inevitably it all goes Pete Tong. Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 6.47pm) Yer right. But the pendulum has swung too far towards f*** the poor to help the rich.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Yer right. But the pendulum has swung too far towards f*** the poor to help the rich. You can't help the poor without incentivizing the rich. The idea that you can make the wealthy pay up is the lie that socialism sells to the poor. Your belief system has a far worst affect upon the poor than the pure capitalist. Your intentions are better....if we ignore the reality of self interest....your intentions are better than the capitalist but the ultimate affect is far worse. Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 8.00pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Have you heard of pseudoscience? I'll take that response as a no. I can assure you that econometrics is no pseudoscience and employs mathematical rigour at its heart.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
I'll take that response as a no. I can assure you that econometrics is no pseudoscience and employs mathematical rigour at its heart. Econometrics was the absolute bane of my life at Uni.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.