This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Why do you keep insisting on referring to him by his full name as it seems rather childish to me. Is Boris Johnson any worse than Diane Julie Abbott (see how silly it looks) Diane Abbott lied when she said that Labour had only lost 50 seats Diane Abbott lied when she claimed it would cost £300,000 to hire the 10,000 new bobbies during an interview with LBC. Diane Abbott lied about knife deaths in Scotland during 2017, when she claimed there was none. Nothing she says can be trusted at all. Labour tend to keep loose cannons like Abbott hidden away during election time. As nonsense just comes out of her mouth.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Come off it. The Boris is a liar ploy in the wider context of politics is utterly feeble. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 Nov 2019 3.36pm) So by the same logic, countering with '[INSERT ANY POLITICIAN HERE] is a liar so there' is just as feeble, if not more so. That is my point. It's a pointless discussion no matter who you aim the target at
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
So by the same logic, countering with '[INSERT ANY POLITICIAN HERE] is a liar so there' is just as feeble, if not more so. That is my point. It's a pointless discussion no matter who you aim the target at A pointless discussion which 'Bill' should not have started. Why you are trying to score points off of it, heaven knows.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Bill E Pilgrim
To be fair the Tories have been in power for most of those two generations. But they are able to reinvent themselves each time they swop leader and blame problems caused by their failures on some scapegoat or other. Nothing he says can be trusted at all. And won London twice.
|
|
| Deleted11 13 Nov 19 6.00pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
And won London twice. Not to pick on you, but, this is the problem right? We seem to view politics as a match of football, where we support a team no matter what. Boris did win London twice, but what did he actually do? Not just him, I'm not sure I can actually name a thing of note any London Mayor has done. This is why I try not to read newspapers and watch things like Question Time, because there's never any in depth discussion on the matters and because papers like The Sun were Labour through and through and now they're full on Conservative. The Mirror is the reverse. How can you honestly switch your views so drastically? I've seen a better attempt in forums like this one, although not always successfully, to try and discuss issues.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Jway89
Not to pick on you, but, this is the problem right? We seem to view politics as a match of football, where we support a team no matter what. Boris did win London twice, but what did he actually do? Not just him, I'm not sure I can actually name a thing of note any London Mayor has done. This is why I try not to read newspapers and watch things like Question Time, because there's never any in depth discussion on the matters and because papers like The Sun were Labour through and through and now they're full on Conservative. The Mirror is the reverse. How can you honestly switch your views so drastically? I've seen a better attempt in forums like this one, although not always successfully, to try and discuss issues. Can't believe I'm supporting that filthy rag but switching allegiance could be viewed in a positive light if they shift to reflect changing values of the 2 main parties.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Jway89
Not to pick on you, but, this is the problem right? We seem to view politics as a match of football, where we support a team no matter what. Boris did win London twice, but what did he actually do? Not just him, I'm not sure I can actually name a thing of note any London Mayor has done. This is why I try not to read newspapers and watch things like Question Time, because there's never any in depth discussion on the matters and because papers like The Sun were Labour through and through and now they're full on Conservative. The Mirror is the reverse. How can you honestly switch your views so drastically? I've seen a better attempt in forums like this one, although not always successfully, to try and discuss issues. Actually the Sun was always a Tory rag. Tony Blair spent a lot of time smoozing Murdoch and was very happy when he switched to supporting New Labour. I guess the Sun has gone back to its natural roots. Daily Mirror has never changed solid Labour all the way. Why did the Sun change, self interest Murdoch could see that Blair was going to win and he always wants to be on the winning side.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Jway89
Not to pick on you, but, this is the problem right? We seem to view politics as a match of football, where we support a team no matter what. Boris did win London twice, but what did he actually do? Not just him, I'm not sure I can actually name a thing of note any London Mayor has done. This is why I try not to read newspapers and watch things like Question Time, because there's never any in depth discussion on the matters and because papers like The Sun were Labour through and through and now they're full on Conservative. The Mirror is the reverse. How can you honestly switch your views so drastically? I've seen a better attempt in forums like this one, although not always successfully, to try and discuss issues. Boris 2 - Ken Livingstone 0.
|
|
|
We need to vote this council out.
|
|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
We need to vote this council out. 40,000 new council tax receipts gosh I wonder which way the council will vote.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
Boris 2 - Ken Livingstone 0. "...because there's never any in depth discussion on the matters" Jway98 1 Chris 123 0
|
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Actually the Sun was always a Tory rag. Tony Blair spent a lot of time smoozing Murdoch and was very happy when he switched to supporting New Labour. I guess the Sun has gone back to its natural roots. Daily Mirror has never changed solid Labour all the way. Why did the Sun change, self interest Murdoch could see that Blair was going to win and he always wants to be on the winning side. The Sun was previously the Daily Herald when it was a paper that gave the working class a voice in the media.
|
|
| Deleted11 13 Nov 19 10.30pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bill E Pilgrim
"...because there's never any in depth discussion on the matters" Jway98 1 Chris 123 0 I did say they weren't always successful
|
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
And won London twice. And wasted £940m on mayoral 'vanity projects' Garden Bridge £52m Three of these were a total failure at a cost of more than £57.5m: the Garden Bridge; the purchase of water cannon; and the Thames estuary airport. Five others: the new Routemaster bus; hire bikes; the Emirates Air Line cable car; the conversion of the Olympic stadium and the ArcelorMittal Orbit helter-skelter, all went ahead at a combined cost of more than £900m. But they all turned out to be far more expensive than promised - just as BREXIT will damage us more than he says.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Bill E Pilgrim
The Sun was previously the Daily Herald when it was a paper that gave the working class a voice in the media. Judge.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Judge. There is also a link between the ages of starting work - my day used to be 15/16, now minimum 18 and if you go to uni 21/22 so later starting to pay tax/NIC
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| W12 14 Nov 19 6.40am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Judge. Everyone will be negatively affected by the next Labour government whether it is Corbyn or whoever. It would be nothing like what happened in the 70’s and Blair has laid the groundwork for this. It would entirely destroy our country if that hasn’t already happened anyway. Take a walk down the Uxbridge road and it looks like it’s too late to avoid this.
|
|
|
Originally posted by becky
There is also a link between the ages of starting work - my day used to be 15/16, now minimum 18 and if you go to uni 21/22 so later starting to pay tax/NIC Well said Becky, start work at 15 retire at 65 and die at 70, that was how the state pension was planned. Today people live longer and in retirement are entitled to benefits in addition to the state pension. In short we are all costing the taxpayer more money. As Tux is fond of saying it's a Ponzi scheme.
One more point |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.